单选题 The outcry over Internet firms" habit of secretly tracking web surfers" activities has clearly resonated inside the White House. On March 16th the Obama administration announced that it intends to work with Congress to produce a "privacy bill of rights" giving American consumers greater control over how their information is collected and used by digital marketers.
Those who have been lobbying for change agree with, but are unsympathetic to, Internet firms" worries that such a law could damage their advertising-driven business models, which rely on tracking and targeting consumers to maximize revenues. "This is dimming the prospects of Google, Facebook and other digital ad companies," says Jeffrey Chester of the Centre for Digital Democracy.
Quite how dark things get for them will depend on the details of the bill. It will seek to lay down the basic principles of Internet privacy rights, broadly following recommendations published last December by the Department of Commerce. The department"s report said consumers should be told more about why data are being collected about them and how they are used; and it called for stricter limits on what companies can do with information they collect.
Whatever legislation finally emerges is likely to give a broader role to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC, which will almost certainly be charged with deciding how those principles are translated into practice and with policing their implementation. Among other things, the FTC is known to be keen on a formal "do not track" system, which would allow users to block certain sites from monitoring their online activities.
Keen to avoid this, the online-advertising industry has been working overtime to convince policymakers that it can police itself using systems such as icons on web pages that show surfers when they are being tracked. And it is telling anyone who will listen that consumers will suffer if tough do-not-track rules hit ad revenues, forcing web firms to charge for more content.
With Mr Obama throwing his weight behind Internet privacy, this rearguard (无望取胜) action is less likely to be successful. Some ad firms have started talking of creating a do-not-track system of their own that would limit the damage to their digital activities. Microsoft and Mozilla, two tech giants, have recently said they are including do-not-track features in new versions of their respective web browsers.
Although all this may dent their revenues, America"s Internet giants could also benefit from the legislation if it helps them in their dealings with the European Union. The EU"s already fairly strict rules on privacy are being tightened further. The time-consuming and expensive legal hoops the EU makes American Internet firms jump through, to be allowed to handle Europeans" online data, will become more demanding.
If by passing its own online-privacy bill of rights, America can convince the EU to ease this legal burden, then it will be an important win for American companies, says Joel Reidenberg, a professor at Fordham University"s law school. Google, Facebook and others will no doubt be tracking the progress of EU-American talks on this matter very closely.
单选题 Obama administration is going to push a "privacy bill of rights" to ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 选B。推理判断题。第1段第2句指出,奥巴马政府宣布欲同国会合作,出台“一项隐私权利法案”。该法案让美国用户在控制数字营销商如何收集利用自己的信息方面拥有更大的权力。由此可以得知这项法案是为了保护用户信息安全的。B项是对此意的同义转述,故为答案。
单选题 What can we know about the report published last December by the Department of Commerce?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 选B。事实细节题。第3段第3句指出,商务部的报告称,用户理应被告知更多,为何要收集与用户有关的数据,这些数据怎么使用;报告呼吁严格限制哪些公司有权对所搜集的信息进行处理,由此可以看出商务部认为网络用户对自己信息被收集及使用有知情权,故答案为B。
单选题 According to the online-advertising industry, if ad revenues suffered a loss because of the tough rules, ______ would finally pay for the cost.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 选C。事实细节题。第5段最后一句指出,网络广告界在告诉任何愿意倾听的人,倘若严格的“不跟踪”规定影响到广告收入,就会迫使网络公司对更多内容收费的话,那么用户就会受损,由此可知最后承担损失的是用户,故答案为C。
单选题 The phrase "this rearguard action" (line 1, Para. 6) refers to the action that ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 选A。语义理解题。该短语所指内容需要从上一段中寻找。第5段第1句指出,网络广告界一直加班加点想让决策者相信,它能自我监督。这是采取的行动,故答案为A。
注意充分结合上下文来判断。
单选题 According to Joel Reidenberg, American companies can make profit if ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 选B。推理判断题。最后一段第1句指出,福特汉姆大学法学院的Joel Reidenberg教授称,倘若美国能凭借自有网络隐私权利法案来说服欧盟减轻这种法律负担,这对美国公司而言就将是一场重大胜利。而“这里的法律负担”所指需要从上一段中寻找。上一段结尾指出,美国互联网企业若要获准处理欧洲人的网络数据,便得跨过欧盟耗时费钱的重重法律障碍,而这些法规日后将更为苛刻。由此可知,这里的法律负担指获准处理欧洲人的网络数据的法律障碍,故答案为B。
注意充分结合上下文来判断。