单选题 In recent years there has been much talk of a "renaissance" in American manufacturing. A few things seemed to be on the side of the makers. For instance, until recently the dollar was weak. American wages were stagnant, but those in China were booming. Cheap shale oil and gas gave factories a boost. But as we argued recently, talking of a renaissance is overblown. And new figures, released today, add to the mounting pile of evidence saying that manufacturing growth is starting to slow.
We argued before that although there has been a recovery in American manufacturing in recent years, it is not a sustainable one. Employment in the sector is still lower than before the crash. So is one important measure of output: real value added. In short, America has not got better at producing stuff.
Also, much of the recovery in American manufacturing seems to be based on a cyclical boom in "durable" goods—things that you expect to last a long time, like cars and fridges. During the recession, orders for durable goods plunged. That"s because it is quite easy to put off such purchases. By contrast, it is more difficult to put off purchases of non-durable goods, like medicines, because people tend to consume them more frequently.
After the recession, production of durable goods soared. Cheap credit, for instance, spurred demand for new motors and rapid growth in carmaking. That sector accounted for over a third of the durable growth from 2009 to 2013. Yet a recovery based on a few durables industries is unsustainable. This is because when pent-up demand is satisfied, a few big industries will suffer. Overall output is likely to stall.
New data confirm this prediction. Orders for durable goods fell by 1.4% in February. Motor-vehicle orders fell by 0.5%. It is possible that the recent bad weather has had an effect here. But it may be a sign of something more troubling. As economists at Capital Economics, a consultancy, argue, "The more general malaise started back in the autumn of last year. Indeed, core orders have now fallen in every month since last October."
In recent months, non-durable goods have also fallen quite rapidly. What explains all this? The obvious culprit is the strong dollar, because it makes manufacturing exports (which account for roughly half of America"s total) more expensive. Alternatively, it may be because consumers are starting to pull back on spending. In January, consumer credit grew at the slowest pace in over a year, according to recent data from the Federal Reserve. In recent months consumer confidence has dropped a bit. And companies may not be so confident, either, and are thus not in the mood to add to capital stock, says Steven Ricchiuto of Mizuho Securities, an investment bank. This does not bode well for American manufacturing or, indeed, for economic growth overall.
单选题 What does the author say about the recovery in American manufacturing?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 由题干中的recovery定位到第二段第一句和该段第四句。
推理判断题。定位句指出,美国制造业近年来的复苏是不可持续的,并认为美国的商品制造业并未得到改善。由此可知,作者显然是认为美国制造业的所谓复苏并不是根本的,缺乏有力的支撑,故答案为D。
A“它可能很快会结束”,尽管作者认为复苏是不可持续的,但并没有说它会很快结束,故排除;B“它只是一种假象”,第二段首句已经明确指出,美国制造业近年来有所复苏,这不是假象,故排除;C“它是崩溃之前的反弹”,文中并没有提及这一点,故排除。
单选题 In what sense "durable" goods cannot boost sustainable economic growth?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 由题干中的“durable” goods定位到第三段第一句以及该段第四句。
推理判断题。从定位句可以看出,作者之所以认为基于“耐用品”增长的经济复苏不持久是基于这类商品自身的特点:一是可长时间使用,不用经常购买;二是不是每天都必须使用,故答案为A。
B“它们易于受到银行政策的影响”,文章虽然在末段提到信贷,但并没有说“耐用品”与银行政策有关,故排除;C“它们的订单很容易被取消”,文章第三段第三句提到这类商品的订单容易被推迟,而不是被取消,故排除;D“生产这些商品的产业可持续性较差”,第四段第四句提到,基于几个耐用品行业的恢复是不可持续的,对于产业本身的可持续性,作者并没有提及,故排除。
单选题 How can we understand the remark of economists at Capital Economics?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 根据题干中的Capital Economics定位到第五段后半部分。
推理判断题。定位部分指出,正如咨询机构“资本经济学”的经济学家们所提出的那样,“自从去年秋季开始,更加普遍的不安情绪就出现了。实际上,自从去年十月份开始,核心订单每个月都在下滑。”与本段前几句提到的经济下滑的数据相比,时间上更早一些,故答案为C。
A“耐用品订单的确会受到恶劣天气的影响”,本段第四句确实提到了坏天气,但也只是一种猜测,故排除;B“耐用品订单的减少是疾病传播引起的”,该选项将malaise的意思错误地理解为“疾病”,而在文中是指“心理和局势上的不安”,故B不符合文意,可以排除;D“新数据可能没有解释这些行业的现实”,分析家的话只是在数据的基础上强调经济并非复苏,并没有推翻数据的意思,故排除。
单选题 What can we infer from the last paragraph?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 由题干中的last paragraph定位到文章最后一段末句。
推理判断题。定位句指出,这对于美国制造业,实际上对于整个经济增长而言,都不是个好兆头,其中“这”指作者在本段中所分析到的各个因素,包括美元走强、消费者更加谨慎和企业投资信心不足等。可见,经济增长的条件并不具备,故答案为D。
A“强劲的美元使美国商品变得没有吸引力”,最后一段第三句只是说美元走强让出口变得昂贵,而没有说让产品变得没有吸引力,故排除;B“消费者不愿意为耐用品花更多的钱”,最后一段主要讨论非耐用品,故排除;C“公司不敢接受银行的资本投入”,本段第七句是说公司对投资变得保守,而没有说资本是来自银行的,故可排除。
单选题 What is the authors attitude towards the outlook of American manufacturing?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 由题干中的outlook及文章大致结构可定位到第五段第五句和最后一段最后一句。
观点态度题。从两个定位句可以看出,从对美国制造业无论是耐用品还是非耐用品的分析结果来看,作者都认为目前的态势不容乐观,暗藏危机,前景堪优。可见,作者对制造业的前景比较担忧,故答案为B。
A“很有信心”,从前文分析可以看出,作者对制造业的前景绝非有信心,故排除;C“有些困惑”,作者对制造业的情况态度明确,并不困惑,故排除;D“非常悲观”,作者虽认为前景不乐观,但还是提到了一些利好因素,因此D说法过于绝对,故排除。