阅读理解 Research on friendship has established a number of facts, some interesting, even useful. Did you know that the average student has 5~6 friends, or that a friend who was previously an enemy is liked more than one who has always been on the right side? Would you believe that physically attractive individuals are preferred as friends to those less comely, and is it fair that physically attractive defendants are less likely to be found guilty in court? Unfortunately, such titbits don''t tell us much more about the nature or the purpose of friendship. In fact, studies of friendship seem to implicate more complex factors. For example, one function friendship seems to fulfill is that supports the image we have of ourselves, and confirms the value of the attitudes we hold. Certainly we appear to project ourselves onto our friends; several studies have shown that we judge them to be more like us than they (objectively) are. This suggests that we ought to choose friends who are similar to us rather than those who would be complementary. In our experiment, some developing friendships were monitored amongst first-year students living in the same hostel. It was found that similarity of attitudes (towards politics, religion and ethics, pastimes and aesthetics) was a good predictor of what friendships would be established by the end of four months, though it has less to do with initial alliances not surprisingly, since attitudes may not be obvious on first inspection. There have also been studies of pairings, both voluntary (married couples) and forced (student roommates), to see which remained together and which split up. Again, the evidence seems to favor similarity rather than complementarity as an omen of successful relationship, though there is a complication: where marriage is concerned, once the field is narrowed down to potential mates who come from similar backgrounds and share a broad range of attitudes and values, a degree of complementarity Seems to become desirable. When a couple are not just similar but almost identical, something else seems to be needed. Similarity can breed contempt it; it has also been found that when we find others obnoxious, we dislike them more if they are like us than when they are dissimilar. The difficulty of linking friendship with similarity of personality probably reflects the complexity of our personalities: we have many facets and therefore require a disparate group of friends to support us. This of course can explain why we may have two close friends who have little in common, and indeed dislike each other. By and large, though, it looks as though we would do well to choose friends(and spouses) who resemble us. If this were not so, computer dating agencies would have gone out of business years ago.
单选题 Research on friendship has demonstrated that______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】事实细节题。[C]项是对第一段第三句中“人们更想和长相漂亮的人交朋友”(physically attractive individuals are preferred as friends to those less comely)的同义转述。第一段第二句,平均每个学生有5至 6个朋友(the average student has 5~6 friends),讲的是平均数目,而不是每个学生都有5至6个朋友,[A]项不正确。[B]项中always(总是)表述过于绝对。[D]项是对原文“化敌为友,友谊更亲密”(a friend who was previously an enemy is liked more)的误解,不是指第一印象不好。
单选题 Studies of friendships have indicated that. in seeking friends we______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】事实细节题。[C]项是对第二段第三句we judge them to be more like us than they(objectively)are的同义转述。[A]和[B]在原文中没有提到。文中指出,观点相近的人更容易成为朋友.但不等于我们会强求别人与我们持相近的观点,[D]项不符事实。
单选题 The experiment conducted on students living in a hostel suggested that______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】事实细节题。题干的出处在第二段最后一句,观点的相似性预示着友谊能够在四个月快要结束时建立起来(similarity of attitudes was a good predictor of what friendships would be established by the end of four months),由 predictor 一词可排除[A]项。最初的联合影响不大,因为一开始人们的观点并不明显,由此可排除[D]项,[B]项符合原文内容。[C]属于主观臆断,原文没有提到学生一发现观点不同就分开。
单选题 Studies of marriage relationships indicate that______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】推理判断题。第三段中指出,相似性在成功的婚姻关系中起着重要的作用,但完全雷同则会带来问题,[D]项的表述准确全面。[A]项与原文相反。婚姻关系与普通朋友关系有所不同,[B]项不正确。背景相同的人成为配偶只是文章提到的一个例子,并不是指要将配偶的选择限定为背景相同的人,[C]项没有完全理解原文。
单选题 Which of the following best illustrates the major view of the passage?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】主旨大意题。对友谊的研究表明,相似性对友谊的影响至关重要,[A]项“物以类聚,人以群分”最为符合。[B]项与原文意思相反。[C]项表示“英雄所见略同”,偏离文章的友谊主题。[D]项表述“患难见真情”,在原文中没有提到。