阅读理解 TEXT C These days lots of young Japanese do omiai, literally, "meet and look." Many of them do so willingly. In today's prosperous and increasingly conservative Japan, the traditional omiai kekkon, or arranged marriage, is thriving. But there is a difference: In the original omiai, the young Japanese couldn't reject the partner chosen by his parents and their middleman. After World War Ⅱ many Japanese abandoned the arranged marriage as part of their rush to adopt the more democratic ways of their American conquerors. The Western ren'ai kekkon, or love marriage became popular; Japanese began picking their own mates by dating and falling in love. But the Western way was often found wanting in an important respect: it didn't necessarily produce a partner of the right economic, social, and educational qualifications. "Today's young people are quite calculating," says Chieko Akiyama, a social commentator. What seems to be happening now is a repetition of a familiar process in the country's history, the "Japanization" of an adopted foreign practice. The Western ideal of marrying for love is accommodated in a new omiai in which both parties are free to reject the match. "Omiai is evolving into a sort of stylized introduction," Mrs. Akiyama says. Many young Japanese now date in their early twenties, but with no thought of marriage. When they reach the age--in the middle twenties for women, the late twenties for men--they increasingly turn to omiai. Some studies suggest that as many as 40% of marriages each year are omiai kekkon. It's hard to be sure, say those who study the matter, because many Japanese couples, when polled, describe their marriage as a love match even if it was arranged. These days, doing omiai often means going to a computer matching service rather than to a nakodo. The nakodo of tradition was an old woman who knew all the kids in the neighbourhood and went around trying to pair them off by speaking to their parents; a successful match would bring her a wedding invitation and a gift of money. But Japanese today find it's less awkward to reject a proposed partner if the nakodo is a computer. Japan has about five hundred computer matching services. Some big companies, including Mitsubishi, run one for their employees. At a typical commercial service, an applicant pays $80 to $125 to have his or her personal data stored in the computer for two years and $200 or so more if a marriage results. The stored information includes some obvious items, like education and hobbies, and some not-so-obvious ones, like whether a person is the oldest child. (First sons, and to some extent first daughters, face an obligation of caring for elderly parents.)
单选题 According to the passage, toady's young Japanese prefer
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】第1段和第2段首句。 [解析] 综合第1段“传统的包办婚娴正大行其道”和第2段首句“但是当今的包办婚娴和以前的包办婚姻有所不同”,可得出当今日本年轻人喜欢新型的包办婚姻。 [点睛] 细节判断题。A和C在第2段提及,但由第2、3段开头的转折词But可知,传统包办婚姻和西方自由恋爱婚姻都有不足之处,不是当今日本年轻人喜欢的。注意解答本题时,要多联系上下文。
单选题 Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】第3段首句。 [解析] 第3段首句说“西方的婚姻模式在一个重要方面有缺陷:恋爱婚姻不一定会产生一个在经济、社会和教育背景方面相匹配的伴侣”,选项A概括了这一层意思,因此选A。 [点睛] 细节判断题。选项B和第3段首句表达的意思相反;虽然原文中提到日本年轻人很精明,但这并不等同于C“计算伴侣的财产”;D和第2段首句意思相反,所以都应排除。
单选题 According to the passage, the figure 40% (Paragraph Five) is uncertain because
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】第5段。 [解析] 第5段最后一句提及“许多日本夫妇在被调查时,即使他们的婚姻是包办婚姻,他们也把它说成是自由恋爱婚姻”,这正是为什么研究者无法确定40%这个数字是否精确的原因。显然这意味着包办婚姻的真实百分比可能更高,选D。 [点睛] 细节判断题。其他三个选项和40%这个数目没有构成直接逻辑关系,都不是正确答案。
单选题 One of the big differences between a traditional nakodo and its contemporary version lies in the way
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】第6段和第7段。 [解析] 本题问传统nakodo(媒人)与当代版(即计算机婚配服务机构)的区别。文中说,传统媒人认识左邻有舍的所有孩子,然后去适当的家庭找孩子的父母提亲;现代计算机婚配服务机构是由年轻人来机构登记资料。可见这两种“媒人”做媒的程序(formality)不同。故选C。 [点睛] 第6段首句说,现代相亲求助于计算机婚配机构,而传统相亲求助于媒人,这与D项对应。但本题问的不是两种相亲(omiai)的区别,而是问两种媒人(nakodo)的区别,注意到这一点,可排除D。另外,说到“拒绝提亲对象”,文中说,媒人是计算机时,拒绝起来不那么尴尬,这也不是两种媒人的区别,而是两种相亲方式的差别。
单选题 What is the purpose of the last paragraph?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】 最后一段。 [解析] 本段只涉及到计算机相亲,提供了这种相亲方式多方面的细节,所以C是正确答案。 [点睛] 段落大意概括题。最后一段完全没有提到传统相亲方式,所以A和B可以同时排除。D“综述全文中心思想并作结沦”,湿然不适用于此。