单选题 As a Canadian immersion teacher, I was enthused to see the letter from John Whelpton about the Canadian immersion experience (South China Morning Post, June 11). 1 would like to take this opportunity to expand upon and challenge some of his views.
I agree that the Canadian immersion and bilingual schools have been successful in producing functionally bilingual students. In the province of Manitoba, there are French, Ukrainian, and German immersion schools; Hebrew bilingual schools; and a school for native Indian students. English immersion programmes are popular for students from the province of Quebec as well as from countries such as Libya and Japan. However, Mr.Whelpton's suggested condition that teachers in these schools must be fully bilingual may be unnecessary. For example, primary teachers can and do function with a smaller vocabulary than secondary teachers.
Secondly, it is doubtful that students will use English because they "understand and accept the objective of making English the language of the classroom", which is a rather sterile motive. One reason that Canadian immersion programmes work is because of the commitment to Whole Language Learning, that is, children learn a language, (first or second,) by using it to transmit or receive meaningful messages that are interesting, real and important.
They want to make their needs and desires known and to understand the world around them. Immersion programmes integrate language and content in an activity-based, child-centred manner so that the child is motivated to use the second language as a tool to transmit and receive messages related to social and academic interests. In addition the second language is modeled throughout the school, is encouraged and rewarded, and thus becomes the language of choice. It is not necessary to "abandon" Cantonese; an immersion programme should provide some daily instruction in the first language.
Mr.Whelpton's third argument that all the students in one class need to be at approximately the same level of English proficiency when they switch to English is unrealistic and unprofitable. How does a teacher group children who have a huge vocabulary but poor grammar skills and others who have correct grammar but a poor vocabulary?
Also, suppose the students have similar language abilities but different learning styles! The odds are that a teacher, at any point in time, will be teaching at a level that is too difficult for one-third, too easy for one-third and appropriate for the final one-third of the students. Hence the concept of co-operative learning, students in heterogeneous groups with a mixture of personalities, talents and weaknesses (a more realistic reflection of life) learn better as they co-operate, instead of compete, and depend on each other for support and information.
This type of learning environment frees the teacher from the traditional lecturing mode in favor of circulating, monitoring and challenging the students to make use of their different experiences to expand their knowledge and skills.
I support immersion programmes not simply so that Hong Kong SAR remains "competitive as an international business centre", but because children who learn a second language partake in an educational experience that expands their horizons in addition to their cognitive, social and affective capabilities; important goals of education indeed.
单选题 How would you describe the author's style of writing?
  • A. In an academic style.
  • B. In a journalistic style.
  • C. In a personal style.
  • D. On the basis of widespread research in the area.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 推理判断题。本题是对作者写作风格的考查。我们从首段可以看出作者以一种闲话家常的方式开篇,因此这是一种个人化的写作风格,故答案为C。A“学术的风格”、B“新闻的风格”与D“在本领域广泛研究的基础上进行的写作”均可排除。
单选题 The author's attitude towards the Canadian immersion programme is
  • A. supportive.
  • B. unenthusiastic.
  • C. critical.
  • D. balanced — prepared to weigh up the pros and cons.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 观点态度题。我们可以从最后一段作者很直观的叙述“I support immersion programmes not simply so that Hong Kong SAR remains...”得知作者对加拿大沉浸式双语教育是认同的,因此A.supportive“赞同的”为答案。B.unenthusiastic“不热心的,不乐观的”,C.critical“批判的”,D.balanced“中立的”均可排除。
单选题 According to the author, the Canadian immersion programme has been a success because
  • A. students accept the objective of making English the language of the classroom.
  • B. students study in classrooms where everybody is at about the same level.
  • C. students can use their first language freely.
  • D. it works towards real life goals.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 事实细节题。本题考查的是加拿大沉浸式双语课程成功的原因。由第三段首句可排除A“学生接受了把英语当成课堂用语的教学目标”。由第五段可知,B“在教室里学习的学生程度相当”并不是沉浸式双语课程所赞同的学习方式,故排除。C“学生可以自由地使用自己的母语”,显而易见,与题干无关。D“加拿大沉浸式双语课程致力于现实生活目标”,结合文章最后一段,我们可以选定答案为D。
单选题 Which of the following will teachers in the Canadian immersion programme NOT do?
  • A. Monitoring students" progress.
  • B. Lecturing constantly to the class.
  • C. Challenging students' ideas.
  • D. Circulating around the classroom.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 事实细节题。根据文章第七段,找到对应原文“...in favor of circulating, monitoring and challenging the students to make use of their different experiences to expand their knowledge and skills”,分别与A、C、D选项当中的关键词Monitoring,challenging,circulating相对应,因此B为答案。
单选题 According to the author, the reality of classroom teaching is more ______ than Mr.Whelpton describes,
  • A. straightforward
  • B. difficult to control
  • C. lively
  • D. complicated
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 推理判断题。本题是对作者和Whelpton两者阐述的课堂教学现实情况进行的比照考查。A.straightforward“直截了当的”;B.difficult to control“难以控制”;C.lively“生动的”;D.complicated“复杂的”。综合全文,作者是对Whelpton的三个主要论点进行扩充和反对,故选D。