Emotional Intelligence is always thought of as a good thing.We lament a lack ofit and praise an abundance.of course, everyone has it to some degree, but with leaders, it's of ten seen as a pre-requisite—the fairy dust a charismatic leader deploys to get things done with a swish, a sprinkle and a smile.
As a concept, EQ is still relatively new, especially compared with IQ, having been around for only some 30 years.The term was coined by psychologists Peter Salvoey and John Mayer in 1990,who described it as “a form of social intelligence that involves the ability to monitor one's own and others' feelings and emotions, to discriminate among them, and to use this information to guide one 's thinking and action.”
Emotional intelligence has a dark side, one that is talked about less of ten but is equally potent.Like a superhero 's superpower.Jochen Menges, assistant professor of organizational behavior at the University of Cambridge, has looked at the dark tactics of EQ while exploring how leaders exert in-fluence.Those with high levels of EQ are brilliant at managing others' emotions to ensure they achieve their own goal, but sometimes they do so with evil intent.
A good leader will use EQ to win over other to achieve success and harmony, but a bad one will use it to manipulate and make people's lives a misery.Almost everyone can remember a leader who did the latter, of ten with aplomb-the charming sociopath who was super effective and always got their own way but left a trail of human devastation in their wake.
It's not all bad news, however.There is a way to tell the good eggs from the bad apples.It's by looking carefully at what they believe in, their guiding principles.“If we wish to know how someone uses their EQ, we need to measure the value they endorse,” Menges says.
Shared beliefis what anchors a leader in their school and their community and makes others follow them.An ethical leader constantly ask themselves and others: are the right things being done for the right reasons? Geoff Barton, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, once articulated this eloquently: “We have to be able to look ourselves in the eye and think:did we know what was right there?”
We all have choices and some must be made with a heavy heart.Being an ethical leader is tough: the responsibility is great but the rewards can be great still.Stay true to your beliefs and the principles you cherish.Use your superpowers for good, to do the best by those you serve.
According to the passage, an ethical leader should________.
无参考译文
情商总是被认为是一件好事。我们总是因情商不高感到遗憾,且赞扬具有高情商的人。当然,每个人在某种程度上都有这种能力,但它常常被视作成为一位领导人的先决条件——就像一位魅力超凡的领导者所使用的“仙尘”一般,他只需轻轻一挥、洒上几滴、微微一笑就能把事情搞定。
“情商”一词出现时间较短,特别是与智商相比,是一个相对较新的概念,至今才存在了约30年。该词是由心理学家彼得·萨洛韦和约翰,维梅尔于1990年创造的,他们将其描述为“一种社会智力,能够监控并辨别自己和他人的感受和情绪,并使用这些信息来指导自己的思想和行动。”
情商也有它的黑暗面,虽然不常被提及。但就像超级英雄的超能力,情商的黑暗面同样具有强大的影响力。剑桥大学组织行为学助理教授约亨,蒙格斯在探究领导者如何施加影响力的同时,研究了情商的黑暗面策略。情商高的人善于管理他人的情绪,以确保他们达到自己的目标,但有时他们这样做是出于恶意。
一个好的领导者会用情商来赢得他人的好感,从而获得成功和和谐,而一个坏的领导者会用情商来操纵他人.让他人的生活变得痛苦。几乎每个人都能记得一位领导者是如何做到后者的,他往往泰然自若——这位迷人的反社会者效率极高,总是我行我素,但在他们身后留下了人类毁灭的痕迹。
然而,也不全是坏消息。有一种方法可以区分好鸡蛋和坏苹果——仔细观察他们的信念,以及他们思想和行为的指导原则。蒙格斯说:“如果我们想知道一个人如何运用他的情商,我们需要衡量他所认可的价值观。”
拥有共同的信念是一个领导者在学校和社区中的基石,也是其他人追随他的动力。一个有道德的领导者会不断地问自己和他人:是否是为了正确的理由而做正确的事情?学校和学院领袖协会秘书长杰夫·巴顿曾掷地有声地阐述过这一点:“我们必须能够正视自己,并思考我们内心究竟有什么样的信念。”
人人皆有许多选择,有些选择必须带着沉重的心情去做。成为一名有道德的领导者是艰难的:责任重大,但回报丰厚。应当忠于你的信念和你珍视的原则,用你的“超能力”做好事,为你所服务的人把事情做到最好。