单选题 Longevity risk, the chance that people will live longer than expected, is potentially very expensive. Never mind the dramatic impact of a cure for cancer: adding an extra year to the average lifespan increases the world"s pension bill by 4%, or around 1 trillion, according to the IMF.
Firms that have sold annuities are the most obvious victims of living longer, as they keep on writing cheques to oldies they expected would have passed on by now. But the most severe risk lies with defined-benefit pension schemes, in which participants are promised an annual payment throughout their retirement, however long it may last. Globally private defined-benefit schemes already have 23 trillion of liabilities—the amount they owe current and future pensioners. Many are grossly underfunded as it is.
Such statistics are enough to send a pension trustee to an early grave. Yet there is an apparent cure, in the form of "longevity swaps", which pension schemes can use to insure against the risk that their members will live longer than expected. In July, the pension scheme of BT, Britain"s former telecoms monopoly, which is wrestling with a deficit of 7 billion, offloaded the longevity risk on over a quarter of its liabilities to Prudential Financial, an American insurer. BT will pay Prudential a monthly fee and it in turn will pay the extra pension costs if the shuffle boarders in question live longer than forecast.
Such arrangements have become increasingly common, with 2014 already setting a record for liabilities offloaded in Britain, the centre of the market. BT"s deal, which covered pension debt worth 16 billion, was the biggest yet. Most of the 20-odd deals so far have been between big pension schemes and insurers such as Prudential and Swiss Re. The deals should help them hedge a risk they already have through their other businesses, which pay out if clients die unexpectedly early.
But the potential liabilities that need to beneutralised far exceed what insurers might want to take on. So new investors are being sought to take on risks associated with ever-older clients through "longevity" bonds, whereby outsiders take on the unwanted risks.
单选题 What can we learn from the report of IMF?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 细节理解题。根据题干中IMF定位到第一段最后一句。这句的意思是:更别提治愈癌症的巨大冲击:国际货币基金组织报告表明:平均寿命增加一年将会使世界养老金的账单增加4%或是大约1万亿美金。选项A不能从国际货币基金组织的报告中得出,选项B在文中未提及,选项C说长寿给社会带来巨大的负担,和文章一致,是正确的,选项D在文中未提及。因此正确答案是C。
单选题 Which is wrong concerning the defined-benefit pension schemes?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 细节理解题。根据题干中的defined-benefit pension schemes定位到第二段第二、三、四句。意思是:最严峻的风险在于固定型分期给付养老金计划,参与者被承诺在他们退休后一直给予养老金,不论时间多长。全球私人固定型分期给付养老金计划已有高达23万亿的负债,是它们欠当前和将来的养老金领取者的钱,很多都负担不起。从译文我们不难看出只有选项C和文章意思不符。因此正确答案是C。
单选题 What is "longevity swaps"?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 细节理解题。根据题干中的longevity swaps定位到第三段第二句。这句的意思是:表面上还有一种治疗方式即长寿交换,这一养老金计划使得它们不用承担成员寿命超过预期的风险。在接下来的例子中,作者阐明了这种养老金计划的模式:即投保公司每年向保险公司缴纳一定的费用,一旦投保的老年人超过预期寿命,则保险公司向投保公司支付额外费用。选项A是错误的,此类养老金计划并未消除不在预期中的养老金。选项B和文章意思不符,此计划使得公司不再承受成员寿命超过预期的风险而不是成员寿命长的危险。选项C在文中未提及。选项D的意思是此计划将长寿风险转移给保险公司。因此正确答案是D。
单选题 Why does the arrangement of "longevity swaps" become increasingly common?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 细节理解题。根据题干中的arrangement和become increasingly common定位到第四段第一句。题目问的是为何这种安排越来越普遍,在第四段的最后一句说明了原因,最后一句的意思是:这些交易将他们同一些风险隔离开来,这些风险是其它的业务带来的,即客户的过早意外死亡带来的支出。选项A,B,C在文中未提及,选项D和文章意思相符,因此正确答案是D。
单选题 What is the author"s attitude in the text?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 态度判断题。在本文中作者只是客观地阐述长寿风险给社会带来的负担以及对其的一些解决方案,并未透漏出个人的情绪在里面。因而作者的态度应该是中立的。因此正确答案是D。