单选题 {{B}}Passage Two{{/B}}
It's becoming something of a joke along the Maine-Canada border. So many busloads of retired people crisscross the line looking for affordable drugs that the roadside stands should advertise, "Lobsters. Blueberries. Lipitor. Coumalin." Except, of course, that such a market in prescription drugs would be illegal.
These senior long-distance shopping strees fall in a legal gray zone. But as long as people cross the border with prescriptions from a physician and have them filled for no more than a three-month supply for personal use, customs and other federal officials leave them alone. The trip might be tiring, but people can save an average of 60 percent on the cost of their prescription drugs. For some, that's the difference between taking the drugs or doing without. "The last bus trip I was on six months ago had 25 seniors," says Chellie Pingree, former Maine state senator and now president of Common Cause. "Those 25 people saved $19.000 on their supplies of drugs." Pingree sponsored Maine RX, which authorizes a discounted price on drugs for Maine residents who lack insurance coverage. The law was challenged by drug companies but recently upheld by the U. S. Supreme Court. It hasn't yet taken effect.
Figuring out ways to spend less on prescription drugs has become a multifaceted national movement of consumers, largely senior citizens. The prescription drug bill in America is $160 billion annually, and people over 65 fill five times as many prescriptions as working Americans on average. "But they do it on health benefits that are half as good and on incomes that are half as large," says Richard Evans, senior analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein, an investment research firm. What's more, seniors account for 20 percent of the voting public.
It's little wonder that the May 19 Supreme Court ruling got the attention of drug manufacturers and politicians across the country. The often-over-looked state of 1.3 million tucked in the northeast corner of the country became David to the pharmaceutical industry's Goliath. The face-off began three years ago when state legislators like Pingree began questioning why Maine's elderly population had to take all those bus trips.
单选题 The elderly Americans cross the Maine-Canada border in order to get drags that are ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】细节题。开篇处便提到,这些老人来来去去是为了寻找他们买得起的药物,因此正确答案应当为C。A选项为“批发出售的药品”,B选项为“非处方药”,选项D为“免税的药品”,均不符合原文,应排除。
单选题 We can learn from the second paragraph that ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】推理判断题。根据文意很容易选出正确选项D:对于有些美国人来说,跨越边境购药是他们能够买得起药品的唯一途径。
单选题 Maine RX mentioned in Paragraph Two is a ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】推理分析题。Maine RX的字面意思是“缅因处方”。考生也许并不直接认识“处方”(RX)这样一个缩写词,但紧接着后文就说:它授权为那些没有医疗保险的缅因州居民提供药品价格的折扣。并且,该段的最后一部分讲道:美国最高法院最近赞成其通过,它尚未开始执行。从这些内容我们可以推断出正确答案为A。
单选题 Most cross-border shoppers are retired people, rather than working Americans, because the former ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】细节题。第3段中提到美国每年在处方药消费方面,65岁以上的人群是仍.在工作者平均消费的5倍。由此不难看出正确答案为B。
单选题 Politicians were interested in the May 19 Supreme Court ruling because ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】细节题。文中第3段的最后一句话提到,老人占了选民人数的20%,因此选项B才是正确答案,他们不能忽视老人手中的选票。
单选题 David and Goliath are names used to describe a situation in which ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】归纳推理加语言知识题。大卫和歌利亚都是《圣经》中的人物:大卫去找歌利亚战斗时还是一个孩子,而歌利亚则是凶恶的巨人。从文章的第2段和第3段不难看出,缅因州所支持的这条法案主要是为处在弱势群体上的老人谋福利,而说到大卫和歌利亚的这一句本身也将缅因州形容为“经常被忽视的”。