阅读理解
Low-level slash-and-burn farming doesn''t harm rainforest. On the contrary, it helps farmers and improves forest soils. This is the unorthodox view of a German soil scientist who has shown that burnt clearings in the Amazon, dating back more than 1,000 years, helped create patches of rich, fertile soil that farmers still benefit from today.
Most rainforest soils are thin and poor because they lack minerals and because the heat and heavy rainfall destroy most organic matter in the soils within four years of it reaching the forest floor. This means topsoil contains few of the ingredients needed for long-term successful farming.
But Bruno Glaser, a soil scientist of the University of Bayreuth, has studied unexpected patches of fertile soils in the central Amazon. These soils contain lots of organic matter.
Glaser has shown that most of this fertile organic matter comes from "black carbon" -- the organic particles from camp fires and charred (烧成炭的) wood left over from thousands of years of slash-and-burn farming. "The soils, known as Terra Preta, contained up to 70 times more black carbon than the surrounding soils," says Glaser.
Unburnt vegetation rots quickly, but black carbon persists in the soil for many centuries. Radiocarbon dating shows that the charred wood in Terra Preta soils is typically more than 1,000 years old.
"Slash-and-burn farming can be good for soils provided it doesn''t completely burn all the vegetation, and leaves behind charred wood," says Glaser. "It can be better than manure (粪肥). "Burning the forest just once can leave behind enough black carbon to keep the soil fertile for thousands of years. And rainforests easily regrow after small-scale clearing. Contrary to the conventional view that human activities damage the environment, Glaser says: "Black carbon combined with human wastes is responsible for the richness of Terra Preta soils."
Terra Preta soils turn up in large patches all over the Amazon, where they are highly prized by farmers. All the patches fall within 500 square kilometers in the central Amazon. Glaser says the widespread presence of pottery (陶器) confirms the soil''s human origins.
The findings add weight to the theory that large areas of the Amazon have recovered so well from past periods of agricultural use that the regrowth has been mistaken by generations of biologists for "virgin" forest.
During the past decade, researchers have discovered hundreds of large earth works deep in the jungle. They are up to 20 meters high and cover up to a square kilometer. Glaser claims that these earth works, built between AD 400 and 1400, were at the heart of urban civilizations. Now it seems the richness of the Terra Preta soils may explain how such civilizations managed to feed themselves.
单选题
We learn from the passage that the traditional view of slash-and-burn farming is that ________
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】判断推理题。文章第1段前半部分"Low-level slash-and-burn farming doesn''t harm rainforest. On the contrary,it helps farmers and improves forest soils. This is the unorthodox view of a German soil scientist...(低水平的刀耕火种这种耕作方式并不会对雨林造成破坏。相反,它会给农民带来好处,并且提高森林土壤的质量。这是一位德国的土壤学家所提出的不同于正统观点的看法)”。既然“不会对雨林造成破坏”是不同于正统观点的看法,那么正统的观点就是“会对雨林造成破坏”。解答本题的关键是理解unorthodox(非正统的)一词的含义。orthodox a.“正统的,传统的,通常的”;unorthodox是其反义词。所以正确答案为B项
单选题
Most rainforest soils are thin and poor because ________
【正确答案】
C
【答案解析】事实细节题。文章第2段第1句“Most rainforest soils are thin and poor because they lack minerals and because the heat and heavy rainfall destroy most organic matter in the soils within four years of“ reaching the forest floor. (因为雨林土壤缺少矿物质,因为当有机物质到达森林地面之后不到四年,其中大部分就会遭到高温和强降水的破坏,所以,大多数雨林土壤很贫瘠。)”,所以正确答案为C项
单选题
Glaser made his discovery by ________
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】事实细节题。从文章中可以得知,Glazer的discovery是“刀耕火种有利于提高土壤肥力”。根据第3段:“...has studied unexpected patches of fertile soils in the central Amazon(意外地在亚马孙雨林中部地区发现了大片肥沃的土壤,并进行了研究)”他的发现途径是选项A项。
单选题
What does Glaser say about the regrowth of rainforests?
【正确答案】
D
【答案解析】事实细节题。根据题干中的regrowth of rainforests 找到第6段第4句:“And rainforests easily regrow after small-scale clearing. ”很容易选出正确答案D项。
单选题
From the passage it can be inferred that ________
【正确答案】
D
【答案解析】推断题。这种题目只能每个选项都看一遍,一个一个排除。根据对主题的判断,可以把A项和C项排除,因为这两个选项与主题相背,所以错误。选项D项中"the richest in the world"太绝对,文中没有说,也不对。文章最后三段表明,有很多证据包括这种耕作方式都证明在亚马孙存在过城市文明,故选D项