问答题 There are more rich people than ever before, including some 7 million millionaires, and over 400 billionaires. From sipping champagne to taking trips into space, they are getting plenty of pleasure — though as our survey of the new rich shows, these rich should have worries, too, not least about the damaging effect their wealth may have on their children. 61)As for the poor, the gap between them and the rich is rising, even in the industrialized countries where for much of the 20th century the gap bad narrowed. In America, between 1979 and 1997 the average income of the richest fifth of the population jumped from nine times the income of the poorest fifth to around 15 times. In 1999 , British income inequality reached its widest level in 40 years.
However, the first question to ask about inequality is this: if the have-nots are angry about it, are they right to be?
62) In societies where advancement is on merit and seemingly open to everyone, regardless of class, race, religion or sex, unequal outcomes ought not to be a cause for concern. No one thinks it outrageous that Tiger Woods is the best golfer in the world and rich to boot; we all had the chance to do what he did, but he had the skill and personality. Nor should it be thought outrageous that Bill Gates has made so much money. 63)But where opportunities are not genuinely equal, governments must do what they can to make them so, chiefly by improving public education and ensuring it is open to all.
64) There is, though, a second way in which anger about inequality could be justified even if opportunities were equal and education were both universal and universally good. It is when power, even power initially gained in a meritocratic way, is abused to raise prices or exclude competitors. That, in a previous backlash, is what gave rise to antitrust laws in America and elsewhere, as government sought to restrain monopolies and cartels.
Helping the poor, the truly poor, is a much worthier goal than merely narrowing inequalities. If the rich get poorer thanks to high taxation, some people may feel pleased but few are better off. If the poor get richer, however, the whole country will benefit. 65)Focusing resources and policy on poverty would be worthwhile simply on humanitarian grounds. But also, the disadvantages of growing up in extreme poverty pose a challenge to a belief in equality of opportunity. And helping the underclass rejoin society is in the interests of all

【正确答案】对于穷人来说,即便是在一些发达的工业化国家中,他们和富人之间的差距也正在拉大。在这些国家中,这种差距本来在20世纪的大部分时间里是缩小的。
本题句子结构不是很复杂,主干是the gap is rising,而as for…和between them and the rich是两个介词结构,even in...是句子的地点状语,其中含有一个定语从句where for much…had narrowed修饰the industrialized countries。考生应注意的是在翻译时语序要进行适当调整,采取拆译法。
【答案解析】
【正确答案】升迁依据的是人的才华,而不论其所处的阶层、种族、宗教信仰和性别如何,似乎人人都有机会——在这样的社会里,不应担心会出现不平等的现象。
在句子结构上,In societies…or sex是整个句子的地点状语,其中又含有一个where引导的定语从句修饰societies,而regardless of…or sex是一个介词结构作这一定语从句中的状语;句子主干是unequal outcomes…for concern。考生应注意:一是语序的问题,由于状语中含有定语从句,因此宜用拆译法对语序进行适当的调整;二是词汇方面,on merit指“依据(…的优秀)品质或长处”,a cause for concern本义指“关注的原因”,但在这里宜转译成谓语“担心(出现)”。
【答案解析】
【正确答案】但如果机会并不是真正平等,政府则必须竭尽所能来保证机会均等,主要途径就是改进公共教育并确保人人有机会接受这种教育。
本题句子结构并不复杂。where…是句子的状语从句,chiefly by…则是介词结构状语,句子主干中还包含一个what引导的简单宾语从句作do的宾语。词汇方面,考生主要是理解主干中的so指代的是前文中的(are)genuinely equal。翻译时,状语从句实际上指的是一种假设的情况,因此宜译成条件句;而后半部分的介词结构表达的是方式或途径,应用增词法将句意予以疏通。
【答案解析】
【正确答案】然而,即使机会是均等的,教育也得到了普及,而且质量普遍很好,人们仍有别的理由对不平等现象感到愤慨。
在结构上,There is a second way是句子主干;in which…be justified是way的定语从句,介词in提到了从句连接词which前;even if...是句子的条件状语从句,其中含有两个并列句。词汇方面,a second way本义为“第二种方式”,但在本句中应译为“另一种理由,仍有可能”,因为其后的justified指的是“有正当理由”;universal在用于教育时,多译为“普及”。
【答案解析】
【正确答案】即便是仅仅基于人道主义考虑,将资源和政策集中于解决贫困问题上也是非常值得的。
本题在语法上主要注意分词主语和would所使用的虚拟语气这一现象。focus…on…指“将…集中于…上”;on humanitarian grounds指“基于人道主义原因”。注意在翻译时应适当地增词将句意疏通。
【答案解析】