复合题

Could the bad old days of economic decline be about to return? Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March, the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel, up from less than $10 last December. This near-tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock, when prices quadrupled, and 1979-80, when they also almost tripled. Both previous shocks resulted in double-digit inflation and global economic decline. So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time?

The oil price was given another push up this week when Iraq suspended oil exports. Strengthening economic growth, at the same time as winter grips the northern hemisphere, could push the price higher still in the short term.

Yet there are good reasons to expect the economic consequences now to be less severe than in the 1970s. In most countries the cost of crude oil now accounts for a smaller share of the price of petrol than it did in the 1970s. In Europe, taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price, so even quite big changes in the price of crude have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past.

Rich economies are also less dependent on oil than they were, and so less sensitive to swings in the oil price. Energy conservation, a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy-intensive industries have reduced oil consumption. Software, consultancy and mobile telephones use far less oil than steel or car production. For each dollar of GDP (in constant prices) rich economies now use nearly 50% less oil than in 1973. The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that, if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year, compared with $13 in 1998, this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0.25-0.5% of GDP. That is less than one-quarter of the income loss in 1974 or 1980. On the other hand, oil-importing emerging economies—to which heavy industry has shifted—have become more energy-intensive, and so could be more seriously squeezed.

One more reason not to lose sleep over the rise in oil prices is that, unlike the rises in the 1970s, it has not occurred against the background of general commodity-price inflation and global excess demand. A sizable portion of the world is only just emerging from economic decline. The Economist’s commodity price index is broadly unchanging from a year ago. In 1973 commodity prices jumped by 70%, and in 1979 by almost 30%.

单选题 The main reason for the latest rise of oil price is _____.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】根据文章首段第二句“Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March, the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel, up from less than $10 last December”可知, 正是因为石油输出国决定降低供应量, 从而使得油价上涨, 对应答案中的B选项。
单选题 It can be inferred from the text that the retail price of petrol will go up dramatically if _____.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】文章第三段最后一句提到“In Europe, taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price, so even quite big changes in the price of crude have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past”, 由此可推断出, 原油价格的变化对汽油的影响不会很明显, 反而油税的上涨会导致汽油价格的猛涨, 所以正确答案为D选项。
单选题 The estimates in Economic Outlook show that in rich countries _____.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】根据题干关键词“Economic Outlook”定位至文章第四段中部“The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that, if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year, compared with $13 in 1998, this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0.25-0.5% of GDP”, 由此可知, 油价的上涨对GDP的影响微乎其微,所以题目的正确答案为D选项。
单选题 We can draw a conclusion from the text that _____.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】根据文章第三段可知, 油价变化对经济的影响不再像以前那么大了, 而且油税才是影响油价涨跌的重大因素。 第四段进一步解释, 目前, 发达国家对石油的依赖减弱离不开产业机构的调整, 石油储备等原因。而且文章最后一段提到“unlike the rises in the 1970s, it has not occurred against the background of general commodity-price inflation and global excess demand”, 由此可见油价冲击已经不再那么可怕, 对应题目中的A选项。
单选题 From the text we can see that the writer seems _____.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】作者通篇讲述的都在强调民众不必对本次油价的上涨表示过分忧虑, 然后分析为什么过分担忧的原因, 因为不同于20世纪70年代, 这次油价上涨影响力不再像以前那么深刻且广泛, 由此可见, 作者的态度是乐观的。