复合题

Directions: In this section there are reading passages followed by multiple-choice questions. Read the passages and then mark your answers on your answer sheet.

Passage one

Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.

Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence “suggests a causal link” between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields those having very long wave-lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as “a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. “

The report is no reason to panic — or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.

At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’ s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.

How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such “ionizing” radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.

But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.

The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33- page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having “biased the entire document” toward proving a link. “Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer, ” the Air Force concludes. “It is astonishing that the EPA would approve the release of this report. ” Then Pentagon’ s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane. 

单选题 The main idea of this passage is _______.The main idea of this passage is _______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】文章开篇就提出了问题“电会致癌吗? ” 。 十多年来, 科学家和新闻界人士指出, 研究结果似乎表示电磁场可能增加患白 血病和其他恶性肿瘤的危险性。 目前为止还难以确定电对健康的影响是否是理性的, 因此本文的主要内容是电对癌症影响的不同观点,故D项为正确答案。
单选题 The view-point of the EPA is ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】原文第二段第三句话“The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence “suggests a causallink” between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields those having very long wave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. ” 提到环保署目前的结论是科学证据指出, 极低频电磁场——长波电磁场——和白 血病, 淋巴 瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系, 故A项为正确答案。
单选题 link” between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields those having very long wave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. ” 提到环保署目前的结论是科学证据指出, 极低频电磁场——长波电磁场——和白 血病, 淋巴 瘤及脑癌之间有着难以确定的联系, 故A项为正确答案。Why did the Pentagon and Whir House object to the release of the report? Because ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】现代军事的任何组织都一直依赖于大量应用电子设备, 五角大楼和白 宫所以反对环保署公布报告之理由就在此。 原文第三段第二句“The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. ” 所以说“五角大楼的关注是可以理解的, 故B项为正确答案。
单选题 It can be inferred from physical phenomenon ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】原文第四段第二、 三句“When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. ” 提到, 当电流通过电缆, 产生磁场, 对周围 物体产生力。 许多年来, 科学家把任何有关“这些力可能有害的想法” 置于一边, 主要是因为力非常弱, 故A项为正确答案。
单选题 What do you think ordinary citizens may do after reading the different arguments? ______
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】虽然关于电对人类健康的影响有不同的观点, 但的确有结果表明磁场可能增加患白 血病和其他恶性肿瘤的危险性, 由于电器在人们生活中无处不在, 可以推测出人们可能会谨慎地避免和电器的过多接触, 故C项为正确答案。