单选题 Historically, TV"s interest in "green" issues has been limited to the green that spends and makes the world go round. (That, and Martians.) As for environmentalism, TV is where people watch SUV ads on energy-sucking giant screens that are as thirsty as a Bavarian at Oktoberfest.
But with the greening of politics and pop culture—from Al Gore to Leo DiCaprio to Homer and Marge in The Simpsons Movie—TV is jumping on the biodiesel-fueled band-wagon. In November, NBC (plus Bravo, Sci Fi and other sister channels) will run a week of green-themed episodes, from news to sitcoms. CBS has added a "Going Green" segment to The Early Show. And Fox says it will work climate change into the next season of 24. ("Dammit, Chloe, there"s no time! The polar ice cap"s going to melt in 15 minutes!")
On HGTV"s Living with Ed, actor Ed Begley Jr. offers tips for eco-living from his solar-powered house in Studio City, Calif.—see him energy-audit Cheryl Tiegs! —while Sundance airs its documentary block "The Green". MTV will set The Real World: Hollywood in a "green" house. Next year Discovery launches 24-hour eco-lifestyle channel Planet Green, a plan validated this spring when the eco-minded documentary Planet Earth became a huge hit for Discovery. "Green is part of [Discovery"s] heritage," says Planet Green president Eileen O"Neill. "But as pop culture was starting to recognize it, we realized we could do a better job positioning ourselves. "
Clearly this is not all pure altruism. Those popular, energy-stingy compact fluorescent bulbs? NBC"s owner, General Electric, has managed to sell one or two. "When you have them being a market leader and saying this makes good business sense, people listen to that on [the TV] side," says Lauren Zalaznick, Bravo Media president, who is heading NBC"s effort. And green pitches resonate with young and well-heeled viewers (the type who buy Priuses and $2-a-lb. organic apples), two groups the networks are fond of. NBC is confident enough in its green week"s appeal to schedule it in sweeps.
It"s an unlikely marriage of motives. Ad-supported TV is a consumption medium: it persuades you to want and buy stuff. Traditional home shows about renovating and decorating are catnip for retailers like Lowe"s and Home Depot. Of course, there are green alternatives to common purchases: renewable wood, Energy Star appliances, hybrid cars. But sometimes the greener choice is simply not to buy so much junk—not the friendliest sell to advertisers.
The bigger hurdle, though, may be creative. How the NBC shows will work in the messages is still up in the air. (Will the Deal or No Deal babes wear hemp miniskirts? Will the Bionic Woman get wired for solar?) Interviewed after the 24 announcement, executive producer Howard Gordon hedged a bit on Fox"s green promises. "It"ll probably be more in the props. We might see somebody drive a hybrid."
Will it work? Green is a natural fit on cable lifestyle shows or news programs—though enlisting a news division to do advocacy has its own issues. But commanding a sitcom like The Office to work in an earnest environmental theme sounds like the kind of high-handed p.r. directive that might be satirized on, well, The Office. Even Begley—formerly of St. Elsewhere—notes that the movie Chinatown worked because it kept the subplot about the water supply in Los Angeles well in the background: "It"s a story about getting away with murder, and the water story is woven in."
Of course, in an era of rampant product placement, there are worse things than persuading viewers to buy a less wasteful light bulb by hanging one over Jack Bauer as he tortures a terrorist. The greatest challenge—for viewers as well as programmers—is not letting entertainment become a substitute for action; making and watching right-minded shows isn"t enough in itself. The 2007 Emmy Awards, for a start, aims to be carbon neutral, solar power, biodiesel generators, hybrids for the stars, bikes for production assistants—though the Academy cancelled Fox"s idea to change the red carpet, no kidding, to green. The most potent message may be seeing Hollywood walk the walk, in a town in which people prefer to drive.
单选题 Which of the following does NOT serve as the example to support the statement "TV is jumping on the biodiesel-fueled bandwagon" (para. 2)?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 对文章基本内容的理解,主要内容见第二段。文章用比喻的说法介绍电视节目开始搭上了biodiesel-fueled band-wagon,并且举了部分电视台和电视节目的名称。解本题可采用排除法,其他几个电视台及电视节目文章均有提及。
单选题 By stating that "Clearly this is not all pure altruism" (para. 4), the author is ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 根据上下文正确理解句子的意思并对作者的态度作出推断。原句位于第四段,而且显然表达了作者的某种批评意见。选项A把作者的态度说反了,选项C中的negative的概括是可以接受的,但是ironic的说法似乎勉强;选项D的概括不够妥当,均予排除。
单选题 Why does the author mention in paragraph 4 the two groups the networks are fond of?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 对文章中的隐含意思作出推测的能力,具体为解释文章介绍的媒体所喜爱的两个群体的原因。内容见第四和第五段。作者的说明直截了当,点明Ad-supported TV is a consumption medium。因此young and well-heeled viewers这两群人当然是其重点关注的对象。选项B是错解,选项C的表达并不正确,选项D的说明并未讲到点子上,均予排除。
单选题 Which of the following best explains the sentence "It"s an unlikely marriage of motives" (para. 5) ?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 根据上下文正确理解句子意思的能力,主要内容见第五段。作者实际是想说明,电视台和电视节目本身是以消费者为目标的广告宣传机构(媒介),电视媒介要把消费与环保结合起来是不容易的。选项A的表达不准确,选项B说出了电视媒介的一大目标,但对问题句本身并不是全面的说明,选项C的说法过于绝对,不符合实际情况。
单选题 It can be concluded from the passage that "product placement" (para. 8) is a kind of ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 根据上下文正确理解词语的意思。原文在第八段。作者并未直接对product placement进行解释,但是在行文中点出,在电视节目的镜头中出现的某些物品的布置等,其目的是为了进行“下意识”推销。选项A,B,D或是错解或是表达不当,均予排除。