单选题
4

In 1993, a mall security camera captured a shaky image of two 10-year-old boys lead ing a much smaller boy out of a Liverpool, England, shopping center. The boys lured James Bulger away from his mother, who was shopping, and led him on a long walk across town. The excursion ended at a railroad track. There, inexplicably, the older boys tortured the toddler, kicking him, smearing paint on his face and pummeling him to death with bricks before leaving him on the track to be dismembered by a train. The boys, Jon Venables and Robert Thompson, then went off to watch cartoon.
Today the boys are 18-year-old men, and after spending eight years in juvenile facili ties, they have been deemed fit for release--probably this spring. The dilemma now con fronting the English justice system is how to reintegrate the notorious duo into a society that remains horrified by their crimes and skeptical about their rehabilitation. Last week Judge Elizabeth Butler-Sloss decided the young men were in so much danger that they nee ded an unprecedented shield to protect them upon release. For the rest of their lives, Ven ables and Thompson will have a right to anonymity. All English media outlets are banned from publishing any information about their whereabouts or the new identities the govern ment will help them establish. Photos of the two or even details about their current looks are also prohibited.
In the U. S. , which is harder on juvenile criminals than England, such a ruling seems inconceivable. "We're clearly the most punitive in the industrialized world," says Lau rence Steinberg, a Temple University professor who studies juvenile justice. Over the past decade, the trend in the U. S. has been to allow publication of ever more information about underage offenders. U. S. courts also give more weight to press freedom than English courts, which, for example, ban all video cameras.
But even for Britain, the order is extraordinary. The victim's family is enraged, as are the ever-eager British tabloids. "What right have they got to be given special protection as adults. " asks Bulger's mother Denise Fergus. Newspaper editorials have insisted that citi zens have a right to know if Venables or Thompson move in next door. Says Conservative Member of Parliament Humfrey Malins: "It almost leaves you with the feeling that the nastier the crime, the greater the chance for a passport to a completely new life. /

单选题 What occurred as told at the beginning of the passage?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 根据第一段的内容可知,两个十岁的男孩谋杀了一个两岁的小男孩,因此D项为正确答案。
单选题 According to the passage, Jon Venables and Robert Thompson______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本题可依据“after spending eight years in juvenile facilities”,从中可知A项 “他们一直被当作少年犯”是正确答案。
单选题 The British justice system is afraid that the two young men would______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 从第二段的内容可知,英国司法面临的困境是如何将两个臭名远扬的渣滓重新融人社会……法官裁决,由于两个年轻人在释放后处于非常危险的境地,他们需要得到前所未有的保护。因此B项“释放后为社会所抛弃”是正确答案。
单选题 According to the British courts, after their return to society, the two adults will be______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 从第二段的内容可知,所有英国媒体将被禁止发布有关他们下落或政府给他们建立新身份的任何信息。他们的照片或有关他们的现在的长相也将被禁止出示。因此C项“被防止认出是杀人犯”是正确答案。
单选题 From the passage we can infer that a U. S. counterpart of Venables or Thompson would______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 从第二段的内容可知,在美国,对少年犯比英国更加严厉,这样的做法是难以想象的。过去的几十年里,美国的趋势是允许公开关于未成年犯罪的信息。美国比英国更重视新闻自由。因此D项“毫无疑问,在美国会受到广泛的公众注意”是正确答案。
单选题 As regards the mentioned justice ruling, the last paragraph mainly tells that______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本题可依据最后一段首句“But even for Britain,the order is extraordinary. (即使在英国,这种命令也是超乎寻常的。)”之后说了人们对判决的争议。因此A项“由于没有先例,所以很有争议”是正确答案。