It used to be so straightforward (直接的). A team of researchers working together in the laboratory would submit the results of their research to a journal. A journal editor would then remove the author's names and affiliations(附属机构) from the paper and send it to their peers for review, depending on the comments received, the editor would accept the paper for publication or decline it. Copyright rested with the journal publishers, and researchers seeking knowledge of the results would have to subscribe to the journal. No longer. The Internet—and pressure from funding agencies, who are questioning why commercial publishers are making money from government-funded research by restricting access to it— is making access to scientific results a reality. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has just issued a report describing the far-reaching consequences of this. The report, by John Houghton of Victoria University in Australia and Graham Vickery of the OECD, makes heavy reading for publishers who have, so far, made handsome profits. But it goes further than that. It signals a change in what has, until now, been a key element of scientific endeavor. The value of knowledge and the return on the public investment in research depends, in part, upon wide distribution and ready access. It is big business. In America, the core scientific publishing market is estimated at between $7 billion and $11 billion. The International Association of Scientific Technical and Medical Publisher says that there are more than 2,000 publishers worldwide specializing in these subjects. They publish more than 1.2 million articles each year in some 16,000 journals. This is now changing. According to the OECD report, some 75% of scholarly journals are now online. Entirely new business models are emerging; three main ones were identified by the report's authors. There is the so-called big deal, where institutional subscribers pay for access to a collection of online journal titles through site-licensing agreements. There is open-access publishing, typically supported by asking the author (or his employer) to pay for the paper to be published. Finally, there are open-access archives(档案) , where organizations such as universities or international laboratories support institutional repositories(仓库). Other models exist that are hybrids of these three, such as delayed open-access, where journals allow only subscribers to read a paper for the first six months, before making it freely available to everyone who wishes to see it. All this could change the traditional form of the peer-review process, at least for the publication of papers.
单选题 In the first paragraph, the author discusses_________.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:细节题。第一段是本文的引子,为第二段的论述做铺垫。综合各句子的含义可以看出,第一段主要描述了科研成果发表的传统过程。因此D项“传统的期刊出版过程”为正确答案,traditional和文中的used to相对应。
单选题 Which of the following is true of the OECD report?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:判断题。第二段第三、四句指出,经合组织的报告描述了免费使用科研成果这一做法的深远影响,出版商读了肯定很不舒服,因为他们赚取了丰厚的利润。可见,C项“它让获利的期刊出版商感到不舒服”是正确答案。
单选题 According to the text, online publication is significant in that_________.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:细节题。第二段第三句提到,网络使免费使用科研成果成为现实。在同一段中,作者还批评了杂志社的传统做法,认为它们限制了人们使用科研成果。可见,作者赞同在线出版模式,认为它能使读者以便捷的方式使用科研成果。A项“它提供了使用科研资源的便捷方式”为正确答案。
单选题 With the open-access publishing model, the author of a paper is required to
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:细节题。第四段共介绍了四种网络出版模式,其中第五句提到了“开放存取出版模式”,在这种模式下,作者或其雇主支付论文出版费用。因此A项“支付出版费用”为正确答案。
单选题 Which of the following best summarizes the text?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:主旨题。文章第一段介绍了科研成果发表的传统过程,用于引出第二段以后所介绍的新的网络出版模式。文章主要从“免费使用科研成果”和“网络出版”两个角度分析了学术期刊出版的变化。B项“新的出版模式正在出现”强调了出版方式的变化,是正确选项。