.  Educators are seriously concerned about the high rate of dropouts among the doctor of philosophy candidates and the consequent loss of talent to a nation in need of Ph.D.s. Some have replaced the drop-outs' loss as high as 50 percent. The extent of the loss was, however, largely a matter of expert guessing. Last week a well-rounded study was published. It was based on 22000 questionnaires sent to former graduate students who were enrolled in 24 universities and it seemed to show many past fears to be groundless.
    The dropouts rate was found to be 31 percent, and in most cases the dropouts, while not completing the Ph.D. requirement, went on to productive work. They are not only doing well financially, but, according to the report, are not far below the income levels of those who went on to complete their doctorates.
    Discussing the study last week, Dr. Tucker said the project was initiated because of the concern frequently expressed by graduate faculties and administrators that some of the individuals who dropped out of Ph.D. programs were capable of completing the requirement for the degree. Attrition at the Ph.D. level is also thought to be a waste of precious faculty time and a drain on university resources already being used to capacity. Some people expressed the opinion that the shortage of highly trained specialists and college teachers could be reduced by persuading the dropouts to return to graduate schools to complete the Ph.D..
    "The results of our research," Dr. Tucker concluded, "did not support these opinions."
    1. Lack of motivation was the principal reason for dropping out.
    2. Most dropouts went as far in their doctoral program as was consistent with their levels of ability or their specialties.
    3. Most dropouts are now engaged in work consistent with their education and motivation.
    Nearly 75 percent of the dropouts said there was no academic reason for their decision, but those who mentioned academic reason cited failure to pass the qualifying examination, uncompleted research and failure to pass language exams. Among the single most important personal reasons identified by dropouts for non-completion of their Ph.D.'s program, lack of finances was marked by 19 percent.
    As an indication of how well the dropouts were doing, a chart showed 2% in humanities were receiving $20000 and more annually while none of the Ph.D.'s with that background reached this figure. The Ph.D.'s income in the $7500 to $15000 bracket with 78% at that level against 50% for the dropouts. This may also be an indication of the fact that top salaries in the academic fields, where Ph.D.s tend to rise to the highest salaries, are still lagging behind other fields.
    As to the possibility of getting dropouts back on campus, the outlook was glum. The main condition which would have to prevail for at least 25% of the dropouts who might consider returning to graduate school would be to guarantee that they would retain their present level of income and in some cases their present job.1.  The author states that many educators feel that ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】 本文为议论文,关注的是博士生的高比例辍学问题。有人指出博士生辍学率高是因为辍学从事生产性工作的收入并不低于博士毕业后。而Tucher博士得出结论:让辍学者返回校园的前景并不乐观。
   细节题。题目问的是作者认为许多教育者们认为______。A“许多教育工作者们觉得应采取措施让辍学者回校学习。”与第三段最后一句话内容一致:“Some people expressed the opinion that the shortage of highly trained specialists and college teachers could be reduced by persuading the dropouts to return to graduate schools to complete the Ph.D.”,B“辍学者应回到低质量一点的学校去完成学业”,C“通常有博士学位的人比辍学者具有较好的适应性”,D“高辍学率主要归因于教师们缺乏刺激鼓励。”这三项在文章中均没有提到。故选A。
[参考译文] 教育工作者们非常关注博士生的高辍学率,这对需要博士生的国家来说是一个严重的人才损失。有一些国家的博士辍学率能达到50%。但是,如此高的辍学率很大程度上只是专家的推测。上周发表了一项全面的调查报告,这份报告是基于22000份分发给曾在24所大学就读的博士生的问卷调查。这份调查报告似乎证实了过去的种种担忧是没有依据的。
   辍学率为31%。并且大多数情况下,辍学者尚未完成博士学位的学业,就去从事生产性工作。根据这份报告,他们不仅赚到了钱,而且收入水平并没有比那些完成博士学位的人低多少。
   经过上周对这次调查研究讨论之后,Tucher博士说道,发起这项调查是因为高校的教师和管理者经常关注的一个问题是有一些未完成博士课程的辍学者有能力完成博士学位。博士水平的人员的缩减被认为是对教授宝贵时间的浪费和已经被使用到极限的大学资源的耗尽。有些人建议高级专家和大学教师的短缺可以通过劝说辍学者返回校园完成博士学位来缩减。
   Tucher博士总结道:“但是此项研究结果并不支持这些观点。”
   1.缺乏学习动力是退学的主要原因。
   2.大多数退学者在博士课程上已经达到和他们的能力水平和专业水平相一致的水平。
   3.大多数退学者现在从事的工作和他们所受的教育和动机相一致。
   约75%的退学者说,他们决定退学并不是出于学术的原因。而出于学术原因的退学者提到:难以通过资格考试,难以完成研究,难以通过外语考试。19%的辍学者一致认为不能完成博士课程的最主要的个人原因是缺乏经济来源。
   作为辍学者干得真不错的证明,统计图表明2%的人文学科辍学者年收入为20000多美元,没有一个有同样背景的博士生达到这个数字。7000至15000美元年收入者中,博士生为78%,辍学者仅为50%。这也可能表明这样一个事实:在博士能挣到最高工资的学术领域中,高工资仍然落后于其他领域的工资。
   至于让辍学者重返校园的可能性,其前景不乐观。至少有25%的辍学者可能考虑返回学校就读,条件是保证他们保留现有的收入水平,有些还要保留他们现有的工作。