阅读理解 China plans to spend billions of dollars in the next few years to develop media and entertainment companies that it hopes can compete with global giants like the News Corporation and Time Warner.
An ambitious plan, set forth in guidelines last week by China's State Council, envisions the creation of entertainment, news and culture companies with a market orientation and with less government backing. China, in short, would like to consolidate its industry into companies resembling Bloomberg, Time Warner and Viacom, analysts say.
"There appears to be a feeling at the highest levels of government that they need a media machine commensurate to the rising status and power of China," says Jim Laurie, a former ABC News correspondent who teaches at Hong Kong University and recently met with Chinese state broadcasting executives.
Beijing hopes the moves will even improve the nation's image overseas—part of a longstanding effort to use "soft power," rather than military might to win friends abroad.
Along the way, Beijing will allow private and foreign companies to invest in everything from music, film and television to theater, dance and opera productions—though largely through state-owned companies.
The News Corporation, Viacom and other Western media giants have for years been frustrated by their inability to win approval to produce films and television programs aimed at Chinese consumers; often, they have operated with Chinese joint venture partners and run into delays or political barriers. Several American companies said they were studying the new Chinese rules and declined to comment further on them.
In its announcement last week, Beijing said that state-owned groups would be reorganized to allow outside financing so that they could "live on their own rather than being attached to government departments as parasites."
The companies will gain greater freedom to finance and produce a wider range of entertainment and cultural content for distribution inside the country, and even for export.
Though China has not provided a detailed plan yet, one exception is likely to be news programming, which falls under the control of the government. China has also been upgrading its state-run news media, with an eye on foreign language publications, wire services and television programs to reach readers and viewers overseas.
Among the first companies to benefit from the new government policy will be Shanghai Media Group, one of the country's biggest state-run news and media conglomerates. In August, the government gave the company approval to reorganize its operations and to issue stock to the public.
The government policy bank will become a partner with S.M.G. on a separate $735 million private equity fund. That fund, China Media Capital, will invest in media and entertainment properties and is headed by Mr. Li, the chairman of S.M.G.
单选题 21.Chinese media industry was characterized by______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】属事实细节题。从文章第二段可以看出,中国的媒体娱乐行业受政府控制的成分较大,并不是完全以市场为导向的,故选项B符合题意。据此也可推断选项A与原文相背离,故选项A错误。选项C只是利用原文关键词进行无关干扰,故选项C错误。外国企业到中国进行投资时采取的是中西合资的形式,这是外企的特点,并非中国媒体行业的特点,故选项D错误。
单选题 22.What is the essential objective in China's move to loosen its control over media?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】属信息推断题。文章在第一段就提出了中国放松对媒体和娱乐行业控制的目的,就是想同世界媒体巨头形成竞争,这也就是说中国不仅想成为经济大国,也想成为媒体巨头,故选项A正确。其他选项虽然符合文意,但是并不是中国放松对媒体和娱乐行业监控的最为核心的目的。
单选题 23.What Chinese government is trying to achieve shows that______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】属事实细节题。选项A和选项B在文中并没有提及,故不可选。选项C与原文思想相悖,并不是国外媒体巨头长期的努力赢得了中国政府的信任,从而决定给他们进入中国市场的机会,而是因为中国想改变其国家形象、发展本土媒体行业,从而成为媒体大国,故选项C错误。选项D符合题意,为正确答案。
单选题 24.Which of the following facts is true according to the text?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】属事实细节题。根据文章第七段第一句话,我们能够推测选项A正确。选项B同原文表述相悖,原文在第九段称中国的新闻业还处在国家的严格监控之下,故选项B错误。选项C过于绝对,且新闻业还是受政府监管的,故选项C错误。选项D望文生义,虽然外国媒体巨头没能在中国独自制作电影、音乐等媒体产品,但是还是通过中西合资的方式进入了中国市场,故选项D错误。
单选题 25.Which of the following is not true in S.M.G case?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】属事实细节题。SMG公司在过去就是股份有限公司,故选项C不合文意。根据文章第十段的描述我们能够看出选项A、B、D符合文意。故本题正确答案为C。