单选题
Whenever I hear a weather report declaring it's the hottest June l0 on record or whatever, I can't take it too seriously, because "ever" really means "as long as the records go back", which is only as far as the late 1800s. Scientists have other ways of measuring temperatures before that, though--not for individual dates, but they can ten the average temperature of a given year by such proxy measurements as growth marks in corals, deposits in ocean and lake sediments, and cores drilled into glacial ice. They can even use drawings of glaciers as there were hundreds of years ago compared with today.
And in the most comprehensive compilation of such data to date, says a new report from the National Research Council, it looks pretty certain that the last few decades have been hotter than any comparable period in the last 400 years. That's a blow to those who claim the current warm spell is just part of the natural up and down of average temperatures--a frequent assertion of the global--warming-doubters crowd.
The report was triggered by doubts about past-climate claims made last year by climatologist Michael Mann, of the University of Virginia (he's the creator of the "hockey stick" graph A1 Gore used in "An Inconvenient Truth" to dramatize the rise in carbon dioxide in recent years). Mann claimed that the recent warming was unprecedented in the past thousand years--that led Congress to order up an assessment by the prestigious Research Council. Their conclusion was that a thousand years was reasonable, but not overwhelmingly supported by the data. But the past 400 was--so resoundingly that it fully supports the claim that today's temperatures ale unnaturally warm, just as global warming theory has been predicting for a hundred years. And if there's any doubt about whether these proxy measurements are really legitimate, the NRC scientists compared them with actual temperature data from the most recent century, when real thermometers were in widespread use. The match was more or less right on.
In the past nearly two decades since TIME first put global warming on the cover, then, the argument against it has gone from "it isn't happening" to "it's happening, but it's natural", to "it's mostly natural"--and now, it seems, that assertion too is going to have to drop away. Indeed. Rep. Sherwood Boehert, the New York Republican who chairs the House Science Committee and who asked for the report declared that it did nothing to support the notion of a controversy over global warming science--a controversy that opponents keep insisting is alive. Whether President Bush will finally take serious action to deal with the warming, however, is a much less settled question.
单选题 What does this passage mainly deal with?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本题属主旨题,问“短文的主要内容是什么”。第二段中作者提到“…it looks pretty certain that the last few decades have been hotter than any comparable period in the last 400 years.”,即过去十几年达到了近四百年的最高温度。第三段中也说到“Their conclusion was that a thousand years was reasonable,but not overwhelmingly supported by the data.But the past 400 was so resoundingly that it fully supports the claim that today's temperatures are unnaturally warm,…”,即数据不能充分说明地球的气温在过去一千年内一直上升,但能证明过去四百年中地球温度不合自然规律地在变暖。因此,短文的主题为A“地球变暖的趋势”正确。
单选题 What is "proxy measurement" in Paragraph 1 likely to refer to?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 本题考查通过上下文猜词意的能力,问“第一段中的‘proxy measurement’指的是什么”。通过前半句“Scientists have other ways of measuring temperatures before that,though—not for individual dates, but they can tell the average temperature of a given year by such proxy measurements…”,可知科学家虽不能测出地球历史上每一天的准确温度,但能够通过“某种测量方式”推测出它的年平均温度,由此我们可以猜到这种方式是一种间接测量,以获得一个均值。后半句以及接下来的一句解释了这究竟是一种怎样的间接测量方式:“…/as growth marks in corals,deposits in ocean and lake sediments,and cores drilled into glacial ice.They can even use drawings of glaciers as there were hundreds of years ago compared with today.”,即测量珊瑚的生长标记,海洋的沉淀物,湖泊沉积物,冰川核,还可以对比冰川几百年前和现在的形状图。也就是说通过测量地球在过去遗留下来的东西,来获得地球温度的间接数据。因此,D“利用以前留下的线索”正确。
单选题 What does the report from NRC indicate?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 本题属细节题,问“国家研究委员会的那份报告说明了什么”。短文在第三段中提到“Their conclusion was that a thousand years was reasonable,but not overwhelmingly supported by the data.”,说的是国家研究委员会对Mann的研究进行了评估,认为Mann的说法有道理,但他的数据也不能完全证明这一说法的可靠性。也就是说,国家研究委员会对Mann的研究既有赞同部分,又怀疑其对一千年界定的准确性。因此,B“国家研究委员会对Mann的研究有所怀疑”正确。
单选题 Which statement is NOT true concerning the controversy about global warming?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 本题属细节题,问“关于全球变暖的争论,以下哪项不正确”。短文在第四段中提到“…it did nothing to support the notion of a controversy over global warming science—a controversy that opponents keep insisting is a live.”,也就是说,国家研究委员会的这项新报告并没有支持在全球变暖这一问题中争执的任一方,而这一争论还将继续下去。因此,“认为全球变暖怀疑论者以失败告终”是不正确的,故D正确。
单选题 What is the author's attitude towards global warming theory?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 本题问作者对全球变暖理论的态度。短文的第四段提到“…the argument against it has gone from‘it isn't happening’to‘it's happening,but it's natural,’to‘it's mostly natural’—and now, it seems that assertion too is going to have to drop away.”此句为作者对全球变暖怀疑论的评价:全球变暖怀疑论者从一开始认为“全球变暖不可能发生”,到认为“全球变暖正在发生,但它仍属自然现象”,到后来再认为它“可能是自然现象”,作者指出认为全球变暖“可能是自然现象”,这一说法还将发生改变,也就意味着怀疑论者可能最终还是会相信全球变暖是人为因素造成的这一事实。这也就暗示了作者是全球变暖理论的支持者,认为全球变暖不是自然现象。因此C“支持”为正确选项。