单选题 Last week 8,400 British students about to enter university received an e-mail from the Student Loans Company (SLC), a government body, reminding them to complete their application forms. It came with an attachment that listed all 8,400 e-mail addresses. The outfit later issued a sheepish apology and promised an "internal investigation". At best, such data breaches make a small dent in a firm"s reputation and the whole thing blows over, as it did SLC"s case; at worst, though, companies lose the trust of their customers and also have to pay large frees. Sony, an ailing Japanese electronics giant, may never quite recover from breach last year, when hackers stole the personal details of over 100m customers.
The explosion of data in recent years was always going to make data breaches more common, as two recent reports make clear. The first is an annual publication commissioned by Symantec, a maker of security software, and carried out by the Ponemon Institute, a data-protection researcher, to look into the cost of data breaches in several countries. Now in its seventh year, the report had some good news for Americans. Calculating the costs of investigations, compensation, customer support and projected loss of revenue, it found that the average cost to a company per breached record declined for the first time since the numbers are tracked. The figure dropped from $214 in 2010 to $194 in 2011, suggesting that companies had become better both at preventing and responding to breaches.
Europeans fared less well. The cost rose from £71 to £79 ($113 to $126) in Britain, from 98 to 122 ($130 to $162) in France and from 138 to 146 in privacy-conscious Germany. In all four countries, around two-thirds of all breaches were the result of technical faults and malicious attacks. But the remaining third was down to negligence. They could, in other words, never have happened.
The second study goes some way to explaining why they did. Iron Mountain, a data-management company, commissioned PricewaterhouseCoopers, a consultancy, to assess the risk of information loss faced by mid-size European companies based on their attitudes to managing data. The report looks at 600 businesses in six European countries across different sectors. It found that businesses tend to regard data protection issues as the responsibility of IT departments. More than haft thought that technology can solve the problem. Only 1% of the businesses surveyed believed it concerned all employees—and thus required a change in behavior.
Both reports conclude that is precisely what is needed. Symantec"s study found a correlation between having a senior executive in charge of information security and lower costs of data breaches. "It has to start at the top," says Marc Duale, Iron Mountain"s head. The best solution need not be the most expensive—employee-awareness programs and staff training can be more effective than pricey IT upgrades. Malicious attacks may be unavoidable but silly mistakes are unforgivable.
单选题 According to Paragraph 1, the Student Loan Company ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】细节事实题
[解析] 文章以英国助学贷款公司最近的一次数据泄露事故开篇。助学贷款公司不小心泄露了8400名贷款学生的邮箱地址。这次事件并没有对助学贷款公司的声誉带来毁灭性的打击,在承诺展开内部调查之后,这一事件很快平息下来。而去年同样经历了数据泄露事故的索尼公司却元气大伤,至今未能恢复。C正确。A错误,第一段中交代了索尼发生泄露事故的原因是因为黑客袭击,但是并没有交代助学贷款公司数据泄露的原因。B错误,作者并没有就两个公司的危机公关能力进行对比。D错误,助学贷款公司的数据泄露丑闻很快平息,并未因此遭受太大的经济损失,而索尼公司则深受其累。
单选题 The first report probes into the problem of data breach by ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】细节事实题
[解析] 文章第二段和第三段具体介绍了第一份调查报告的内容。第二段中明确指出“The fast is an annual publication...to look into the cost of data breaches in several countries”,“第一份年度调查报告调查不同国家为数据泄露所付出的代价”。主要的方法是计算调查费用、善后补偿费用、客户支持上的花费以及对企业造成的潜在收入损失(Calculating the costs of investigations, compensation, customer support and projected loss of revenue)。因此本题的正确答案应该选D。A偷换概念,将公司为数据泄露事故所付出的开销偷换为公司为了防止泄露事故而投入的资金。B张冠李戴,将第二份报告的内容说成是第一份报告的内容。C不是该报告的主要内容。
单选题 Which of the following statements is true according to the first report?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】判断题
[解析] 根据第二段和第三段的内容,美国公司为数据泄露事故付出的平均代价第一次出现了下降,由2010年的$214降到了2011年的$194,这显示出美国公司在数据保护和数据泄露处理上变得更加得心应手。而第三段中列举了几个欧洲国家的数据保护平均花费,全部都出现了不同程度的上涨,这说明这几个国家在数据保护方面不进反退。D正确。A错误,虽然美国在数据泄露上付出的平均代价出现了下降,但是金额却要比欧洲国家高,这说明数据泄露的问题在美国依然很严重。B错误,第三段中作者明确指出,在包括美国在内的四个国家中,大约有三分之一的事故是由于疏忽大意导致的,而并非像B所说的,大部分都是由于不可控因素导致的。C错误,调查的是在泄露事故发生之后公司付出的代价,而非数据发生前公司所投入的防范费用,因此美国和欧洲国家在这方面的开销无从比较。
单选题 According to the second report, the occurrence of those data breach cases which should be avoided is a result of ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】细节事实题
[解析] 第一份报告中指出,许多数据泄露事故并不是因为技术因素导致的,而是疏忽大意导致的,为什么会出现这种现象,第二份报告在某种程度上做出了解释。第二份报告调查了不同公司面临的数据泄露风险。主要的研究方法是对不同公司展开调查,看他们对于数据安全的态度。大多数公司都认为保证数据安全是信息技术部门的任务,只有极少数公司认为信息安全责系每个员工。正是因为公司缺乏信息安全管理理念才导致了许多本来可以避免的信息泄露事故的发生。本题的正确答案应该选D。A利用原文当中的risk of information loss设置干扰。B利用最后一段中的senior executive设置干扰。C与作者观点背道而驰,作者认为信息安全并不仅仅是信息技术部门的责任,而是公司每一个员工的责任。
单选题 From the last paragraph, we know that the best way to improve data protection performance, companies should ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】细节事实题
[解析] 文章最后一段具体指明了公司加强数据保护的方法,最好的方法不是升级信息软件,而是开展员工培训。“The best solution need not be the most expensive—employee-awareness programs and staff training can be more effective than pricey IT upgrades”。A正确,B错误。C是最后一段提到的内容,公司管理层对于信息安全的管理作用非常明显,但是基于题干里的best solution一词,C并非最佳答案。D属于过度引申,提升员工的信息安全意识,并不代表一定要在员工的考核中加入对数据保护方面的表现的考核。