单选题 Admittedly, minor accidents and slip-ups continue to shake public confidence in nuclear power. Given the unquantifiable risks that nuclear power carries, it is only right that the industry be subjected to the test of public opinion and due political process. However, this argues for exceptional alerts, regulatory scrutiny and accountability—and not for bans or shut-downs. Those nuclear operators with a good safety record deserve to have their licenses renewed, so that existing plants may run to the end of their useful lives.
The Bush administration's enthusiastic support goes a lot further than this, however. It also wants to see new plants. Proponents of new nuclear power stations make three arguments in their favor. They will enhance energy security by lessening dependence on fossil fuels; far from being environmentally harmful, they will be beneficial because they will reduce the output of greenhouse gases; and, most crucially, the economics of nuclear power has improved from the days when it was wholly dependent on bail-out (财政支持) and subsidy.
Yet these arguments do not stand up to investigation. The claim that governments should support nuclear power to reduce their vulnerability (弱点) to the OPEC oil cartel (联合企业) is doubly absurd. Little oil is used in power generation: What nuclear power displaces is mostly natural gas and coal, which are not only more plentiful than oil but also geographically better distributed. Security is enhanced not by seeking energy self-sufficiency but through diversification of supplies. Creating lots of fissile material that might be pinched by terrorists is an odd way to look for security anyway.
What about the argument that climate change might be the great savior of nuclear power? Global warming is indeed a risk that should be taken more seriously than the Bush administration has so far done. Nuclear plants do not produce any carbon dioxide, which is the principal greenhouse gas. However, rushing in response to build dozens of new nuclear plants would be both needlessly expensive and environmentally unsound.
It would make far more sense to adopt a carbon tax, which would put clean energy sources such as solar and wind on an equal footing with nuclear, whose waste poses an undeniable (if remote ) environmental threat of its own for aeons to come. Governments should also dismantle (拆除) all subsidies on fossil fuels-especially for coal, the dirtiest of all. They should adopt reforms that send proper price signals to those who use power, and so reduce emissions : global warming certainly provides one argument in favor of nuclear power, but it is not sufficient on its own to justify a nuclear renaissance.

单选题 What's the public's opinion about nuclear industry?
A. People have little confidence in nuclear power for the potential disaster of nuclear accidents.
B. People think it important to exercise strict monitoring and effective management of the existing plants.
C. People believe the best way to avoid nuclear disaster is to shut down all the nuclear power stations.
D. People agree to prohibit the existing nuclear plants from running to the end of their useful lives.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 本题是个建立在细节上的推理题。根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第一段。段中讲,考虑到核能存在难以估量的风险,它应当经受公众意见和适当的政治程序的考验,这才是正确的。但是,这些都是为了格外小心、制定详细的审查规章和责任制度。也就是说,公众认为,只要加强管理、责任到位就可以了。
单选题 The most important reason why the Bush administration support more new nuclear-power plants is that ______.
A. they need little government financial support
B. they will increase energy security
C. they help lessen dependence on fossil fuels
D. they are environmentally friendly
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本题是个细节判断题。根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第二段。第二段提及布什政府支持核能,有很多原因,其中最重要的是,核能不再依赖政府财政支持和补助。
单选题 According to the author, energy security can only be achieved by ______.
A. using less oil in power generation
B. replacing fossil fuels with more nuclear power
C. seeking energy self-sufficiency
D. expanding the sources of power supply
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 本题是个细节判断题。根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第三段。第三段中强调了寻求安全的方式:并不是通过寻求能源自给自足,而是通过供给的多样化。选项D是其同义替换。
单选题 According to the passage, which of the following measures is the least helpful in protecting the environment?
A. Cutting off subsidies on all fossil fuels.
B. Encouraging the use of clean energy sources.
C. Promoting the resurgence of nuclear power.
D. Adopting price reform to reduce emission.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 本题是个建立在细节上的推理题。根据题干,考生可锁定文章的第五段。第五段详细说明了解决这一问题的方法:鼓励使用清洁能源,撤除补助,提供价格信号减少排放。而最没有帮助的做法是,鼓励核能复兴。
单选题 It's implied that ______.
A. nuclear power stations may become the targets of terrorist attack
B. carbon dioxide is the principal source of greenhouse gas
C. the Bush administration doesn't give due weight to environment protection
D. nuclear waste will turn to be an environmental threat in the long-run term
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 本题是个细节判断题。根据题干,可锁定文章的第四段。第四段中讲,保护环境方面,布什政府做得远远不够。