单选题 Young drivers who use cell phones at the wheel drive like the elderly — with slower reaction times and an increased risk of accidents — a new study shows. And what's more, hands-free phones are no safer than handheld ones, scientists behind the study say.
"If you put a 20-year-old driver behind the wheel with a cell phone, their reaction times are the same as a 70-year-old driver who is not using a cell phone," said David Strayer, a University of Utah psychology professor and principal author of the study. "For five years or so we've been interested in what happens when someone picks up a cell phone and starts to drive," Strayer said. One thing that appears to happen is that phone-using drivers of all ages have significantly diminished reaction times. They are slower to hit the brakes and more likely to get into accidents.
Subjects took "freeway drives" in a simulator, using a hands-free mobile phone for half of the drive. "We're seeing an 18 to 20 percent slowing of reaction times," Strayer explained. "That means if someone is talking on a phone, it takes them longer to hit the brakes. They are more likely to get into an accident, and if they do get into one, it might be more severe, because they won't be able to decelerate as much. What you've effectively done is made the reactions of a 20-year-old comparable to those of a 70-year-old."
Elderly drivers saw similar declines in reaction times when they took the wheel with phones. In a bit of a surprise, however, their reactions did not deteriorate at a greater rate than those of their younger counterparts. "We see in the lab that older adults tend to have slower reaction times in general and also sometimes have difficulty multitasking relative to maybe a 20-year-old," Strayer said. But in the study the 20 older subjects (average age: 70) suffered no greater impairment than their 20 younger colleagues (average age: 20). Phone users of all ages also took 17 percent longer to return to the speed of traffic after braking. Such sluggish driving can affect the likelihood and severity of rear-end collisions and help to create gridlock, especially when many drivers display such behavior.
Strayer and his group employed only hands-free phones for testing. Some states, including New York and New Jersey, have enacted safety legislation that restricts drivers to hands-free mobile phone use. But many researchers say the taws aren't enough — and may be completely useless. "We have research that concludes that the use of a phone, whether handheld or hands-free, can have the same negative impact," said Rae Tyson, spokesman for the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). In fact, NHTSA studies at the University of Iowa suggested that in some cases, hands-free devices could pose a greater risk, because tasks like dialing can be more difficult and take longer. The University of Utah team's research delivered similar results. "The distinction some laws make between hands-free and regular phones doesn't stand up to scientific scrutiny," Strayer explained. "We've done studies, and other studies in Sweden and Australia have all come to the same conclusion: that it's a very similar signature of impairment."
The distracting effects of cell phones are attributed largely to the conversations themselves, which draw a driver's attention away from the road. The effect is dubbed inattention blindness. "Not to say that dialing isn't a problem, but you can probably develop work-arounds where your hands are off the wheel for a limited amount of time," Strayer said. "Drivers engage in multitasks, like eating a sandwich or tuning the radio, when they perceive a lull in traffic and think it's safer. People are not too bad at judging those lulls if it's a relatively short activity." But the context of phone conversation seems too big a distraction for most motorists. "We used an eye tracker to try to see what they were looking at while talking on the phone," Strayer said. "The measurements show that they simply aren't picking up information that's right in front of them, whether it's as mundane as a street sign or even a person or child on the side of road."
Interestingly subjects in earlier studies displayed no similar distractions when talking to passengers, or listening to the radio or books on tape. The NHTSA believes that driver distractions of all types are a factor in probably 25 to 30 percent of crashes, but more specific data are unavailable. "Our findings and those of others are that driving performance can be compromised by using wireless communication devices," Tyson said. "In general there is certainly the potential for deterioration of driving skills if you are talking and driving at the same time — but nobody knows precisely what the impact of cell phones has been."
单选题 Which of the following is true about the findings of the new study?
  • A. 18 to 20 percent of the phone-using drivers are likely to get into accidents.
  • B. Using hands-free phones while driving can help decrease accidents.
  • C. Using cell phones while driving is very dangerous for young people.
  • D. Young phone-using drivers have slower reaction times than elderly ones.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 事实细节题。首段说的是这项新研究的研究结果,其中包括:开车时使用手机的年轻人像老年人一样反应迟缓、更容易发生事故、免提式手机并不比手提式手机安全。故“开车时使用手机对年轻人来说很危险”正确,选C。B“免提手机有助减少事故”,D“使用手机的年轻司机反应比老年人慢”都和该研究结果矛盾,故皆可排除。由第三段第二句可知“18 to 20 percent”是说实验对象开车时使用手机反应速度变慢的程度,和事故发生的可能无关,故可排除A。
单选题 Which of the following is INCORRECT about the subjects of the new Utah study?
  • A. There were at least 40 subjects who were studied on.
  • B. Half of the subjects used cell phones while the other half didn't.
  • C. The subjects were driving in a simulator instead of in the real roads.
  • D. The subjects used only hands-free cell phones during the study.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 事实细节题。由第四段第四句可知A正确,排除。B选项犯了偷换概念的错误,将原文中一半的车程换成一半的实验对象,故选B。第三段首句说实验对象参与到一套模拟高速公路驾驶的设备中并在一半的车程中都在使用手机,由此可知C正确,可排除。由第五段首句可知D正确,可排除。
单选题 "Gridlock" in the last sentence in Para. Four can be best replaced by
  • A. casualties.
  • B. traffic jam.
  • C. dispute.
  • D. scraping.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 语义理解题。第四段尾句中,gridlock的主语是sluggish driving,剔除不相关的信息,句子为Such sluggish driving... can help create gridlock, especially when many drivers display such behavior。由这句话不难看出gridlock是缓慢的驾驶带来的结果,并且这种现象在司机们都开得很慢时尤为严重,根据常识可猜测gridlock可能是“交通堵塞”的意思,答案选B。A“死亡人数”、C“冲突”、D“刮痕”都不属于驾驶缓慢可能带来的结果,皆可排除。
单选题 Both the Utah team and NHTSA conclude that
  • A. drivers should be restricted to hands-free mobile phones only.
  • B. phone-users need longer time to return to the normal speed after braking.
  • C. hands-free mobile phones are no safer than handheld ones for drivers.
  • D. a 20-year-old phone-using driver is just like a 70-year-old driver.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 推理判断题。由首段尾句可知Utah team认为免提式手机并不比手提式手机安全,而第五段第四句中NHTSA发言人也说他们认为无论使用免提手机还是手提手机一样会在开车时产生不良影响,故C为二者共同的结论。由第五段第二句可知限制司机使用免提手机只是一些安全法案的规定,并不是其中一方的结论,排除A。由第四段倒数第二句和首段首句可以判断B、D都只是Utah team单方面的看法,排除B、D。
单选题 We can infer from the last two paragraphs that
  • A. drivers will have inattention blindness while talking on the phone.
  • B. dialing numbers while driving seems to be harmless to drivers.
  • C. eating a sandwich or tuning the radio while driving is safe to a driver.
  • D. talking on the phone while driving will not affect a driver's driving skills.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 推理判断题。由倒数第二段首句可知司机注意于手机谈话而忽视路况的现象被戏称为“Inattention blindness”,故A正确。由倒数第二段第三句Strayer所说的话可知拨号也是一个问题,只是相较于按电话还可以采取补救措施,故B错。由倒数第二段第四句可知吃三明治或是调收音机是司机认为相对安全时做的事,文章并未提及这样的事是安全的,故排除C。尾段尾处明确提出驾车时打电话必定影响司机的技术,故D错。