单选题 Steve Jobs didn"t think that technology alone could fix what ails American education. It"s worth remembering that in the wake of last week"s coverage of Apple"s new iBooks platform, which the company promises will radically change how students use and experience textbooks. Under Apple"s plan, companies and individuals will be able to self-publish textbooks, ideally creating a wider array of content. Students will be able to download and use these books on their iPad much like they would use a regular textbook.
Let"s slow down. Textbooks or tools that look a lot like textbooks aren"t going anywhere anytime soon. And since high quality educational material isn"t cheap to generate, simply tearing down distribution barriers will only go so far in reducing the costs of producing good content. Lost in the heated claims, however, is a more fundamental question: what have educational technology efforts accomplished to date and what should we expect?
As a field, education is easily seduced by technological promises. Textbooks? Thomas Edison saw movies as way to replace them. These days, conservatives are in love with the idea that technology will not only shrink the number of in-classroom teachers but render the teachers" unions obsolete.
The experience to date is less grandiose and more worrisome considering the billions that have been spent on technology in schools in the past few decades. Interactive whiteboards have been around since the early 1990s and done little to transform how teachers teach, and computers are often unaligned with classroom instruction, even though 90% of classrooms around the country have them.
The reasons for the slow pace of change are as obvious as they are stubborn. Altering classroom and school practice in our wildly decentralized education system is always a slow process. Many teachers are not familiar with technology or how to use it in the classroom, and high-quality training programs—either in schools of education or as part of a teachers" professional development—are rare.
Besides, even a top-shelf product can only augment live teaching. Likewise, technology is bringing back in vogue the idea of the "flipped classroom" with the teacher acting as a "guide on the side" rather than the primary source of instruction. I say back in vogue because, ironically, talk of devaluing the teacher as content provider has been a fixture of progressive education thought for a century. Another variation of the flipped-classroom idea is to use technology to explain concepts at home and use classroom time differently. But much of the online content available today merely replicates the lame instruction already available in too many of our nation"s schools.
American education desperately needs an overhaul that goes far beyond upgrading computers in the classroom. Jobs was right: technology by itself won"t fix what ails our schools. He saw teachers" unions and archaic practices as the big barriers. Perhaps, but I"d argue they are symptoms of our larger inattention to instructional quality. The bells and whistles of technology, for all its promise, are distracting us from this mundane but essential reality.
单选题 The release of Apple"s new iBooks platform is mentioned in the first paragraph to ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】作者意图题
[解析] 第一段中提到了苹果公司最新发布的iBooks平台。苹果公司宣称这一平台能够彻底改变学生使用教科书的体验。作者提到这个例子是为了引出话题,具体话题在第二段中得到陈述。作者认为,苹果公司的这个软件只是人类一直以来尝试使用技术彻底改变教育的野心的一种体现。作者呼吁在人们对技术的一片狂热中,我们应该冷静下来,好好想想,技术究竟能够给教育带来什么?因此,苹果公司的例子只是作者引出自己观点的引子,正确答案应该选C。A选项错误,第一段中提到了斯蒂夫·乔布斯曾经说过:“美国的教育问题不能单单依靠技术革新来解决”。他的观点与作者不谋而合,作者举苹果的例子并不是为了说明乔布斯言行不一。B选项错误,苹果的iBooks系统是技术界的新动向,作者举这个例子,并不是将它作为一个以往的案例印证现在的趋势。D选项错误,作者在第一段提到了苹果宣称该款软件可能带来革命性的意义,但是作者并不相信苹果公司的豪言壮语,也无谓去预测这种新技术可能带来的变化。因为在作者看来,技术无论如何发展,都无法代替教育最本质的东西。
单选题 In this article, the author mainly criticizes ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】中心主旨题
[解析] 作者在第二段最后一句话中,就点明了文章想要讨论的核心内容:“what have educational technology efforts accomplished to date and what should we expect.”教育技术到底取得了哪些成果?我们应该抱有怎样的期待?在第四段中,作者运用实例告诉读者,尽管美国学校在教育方面投入巨资,却没有取得理想效果。第五段作者批判了企图用远程教育技术代替教师在教学中扮演的核心指导地位的“反向理论”,并且在最后一段中呼吁教育界重新定位,将注意力从教育技术转移到教育质量上。A、B和D这三个选项的内容文中都有提及,也都是作者批判的内容。但是这些批判都是为作者最终的观点服务的,“目前来看,技术还没有能够为教育界带来实质性改变,既然收效甚微,那么想用技术替代教师的核心地位就是天方夜谭。”正确答案应该选C。
单选题 Which of the following phrases is closest in meaning to "be unaligned with"?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】词汇题
[解析] 题干中的短语出现在文章的第四段。在这一段中,作者主要讨论了美国在过去的几十年中,虽然投入不少资金更新学校设备,但是却没有能够起到很好的教学效果。例如,90年代引入课堂的交互式电子白板并没有在多大程度上改变教学模式。而互联网也往往unaligned with课堂指导。根据上下文意思判断,这里应该填一个短语表示“不协调的,不一致的,无法融合的”,正确答案为A,be incompatible with表示“与……不兼容”。B选项be unassisted by表示“没有得到……的帮助”。C选项be inseparable from意思是“与……不可分割”。D选项be indispensible for表示“对……不可或缺”。
单选题 Which of the following statements about "flipped classroom" is true?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】判断题
[解析] 文章第五段作者主要讨论了再度风行的“反向课堂”理念的弊端。“反向课堂”理念并不是一个全新的概念,事实上它的核心理念在一个世纪前就已经出现了,故A选项错误。它的理念主要是强调教师在教学中不再是教学指导的实施者,而是成为“guide on the side”,学习辅助向导,因此这一理念彻底颠覆了教师在课堂上扮演的传统角色,D选项正确。现代“反向课堂”的一个变形就是鼓励学生自己在家里用技术掌握概念,而课堂上则完成其他教学活动。可见在“反向课堂”中,教师并不是课后对学生进行辅导,仍然是在课堂上开展活动,只是活动本身和传统的课堂活动不太一样,故B选项错误。C选项利用原文中的lame instruction一词设置干扰,作者在第四段中提到,“反向课堂”效果不佳,原因是目前大多数网络学习都只是走过场,内容不过是教师蹩脚指导的翻版,而不是像C选项所说的效果不佳是因为课堂指导不尽如人意。
单选题 In the author"s opinion, the biggest obstacle to the improvement of American school is ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】作者观点题
[解析] 在本文中,作者用一大半的篇幅论述了教学设备和技术更新并没有带来教育质量提高这一论点。讨论这个问题,作者真正的目的是引导读者重新思考影响教育的核心因素。作者在最后一段直接表明了自己对这个问题的看法。他首尾呼应,在最后一段再次提到了乔布斯的那句话:“技术不能解决教育的全部问题”。乔布斯将美国教育的问题归结于teachers" unions和archaic practices,正是A选项和B选项的内容。但这是乔布斯的观点,作者的观点比他更进一步。作者认为教师联合会碌碌无为、教学方法陈腐,这一切归根结底都源于对教学质量的不重视。因为不重视教学,因此才不去想方设法改善教学方法,因为不重视教学,教师联合会才因此坐以待毙。因此,本题的正确答案应该选C。而D选项是利用文中第五段提到的一个概念decentralized education system设置干扰,作者在第五段中提到“美国教育体系分散化”是为了说明更新设备和技术手段在美国总是收效甚微的原因,和本题并没有直接的关联。