阅读理解 So much data indicate the world's progress towards meeting the Millennium Development Goals(MDGs), a set of targets adopted by world leaders at the UN ten years ago. But the goal-setting exercise has further pitfalls. Too often, the goals are reduced to working out how much money is needed to meet a particular target. Yet the countries that have made most progress in cutting poverty have largely done so not by spending public money, but by encouraging faster economic growth. As Shanta Devarajan, the World Bank's chief economist for Africa, points out, growth does not just make more money available for social spending. It also increases the demand for such things as schooling, and thus helps meet other development goals. Yet the goals, as drawn up, made no mention of economic growth.
Of course growth by itself does not solve all the problems of the poor. It is also clear that while money helps, how it is spent and what it is spent on are enormously important. For instance, campaigners often ask for more to be spent on primary education. But throughout the developing world teachers on the public payroll are often absent from school. Teacher-absenteeism rates are around 20% in rural Kenya, 27% in Uganda and 14% in Ecuador.
In any case, money that is allocated for such services rarely reaches its intended recipients. A study found that 70% of the money allocated for drugs and supplies by the Ugandan government in 2000 was lost; in Ghana, 80% was siphoned off. Money needs to be spent, therefore, not merely on building more schools or hiring more teachers, but on getting them to do what they are paid for, and preventing resources from disappearing somewhere between the central government and their supposed destination.
The good news is that policy experiments carried out by governments, NGOs, academics and international institutions are slowly building up a body of evidence about methods that work. A large-scale evaluation in Andhra Pradesh in southern India has shown, for example, that performance pay for teachers is three times as effective at raising pupil's test scores as the equivalent amount spent on school supplies.
And in Uganda the government, appalled that money meant for schools was not reaching them, took to publicizing how much was being allotted, using radio and newspaper. Money wastage was dramatically reduced. The World Bank hopes to bring such innovations to the notice of other governments during the summit, if it can. For if the drive against poverty is to succeed, it will owe more to such ideas and their wider use than to targets set at UN-sponsored summits.
单选题 11.According to the text, which of the following merits can't we derive from economic growth?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】属事实细节题。选项A和选项B在文章第一段倒数第二句提及,故符合文意;文章第二段第一句谈到光靠经济发展并不能解决贫穷人口的所有问题,所以不能说快速的经济发展就能让穷人脱离贫困,故选项C为正确答案。选项D是对第二段第一句的补充,符合文意。
单选题 12.Teacher-absenteeism is cited as an example______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】属逻辑关系题。作者在第二段提到非洲教师缺勤率较高的例子,旨在说明该段的主题句,即“资金如何花、花在什么地方以及取得什么样的效果的重要性”。随后在第三段进一步又强调,在教育上的投资“不应仅仅是建设更多的学校、雇佣更多的教师,更应该让教师们干好其本职工作”。由此可看出,作者举了这样一个反例来强调资金所带来效用的重要性,故选项C为正确答案。选项B对原文理解有所偏差,教育确实是需要投资的领域,只不过要注意投资的效用。选项A和D与举该例子的目的相差较远,故不可选。
单选题 13.According to the author, we should______when dealing with allocated money.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】属信息推断题。作者在全文的后半部分,用了大部分篇幅强调资金应该放到最需要的地方去,政府应该注意资金的流向,谨防资金从中央政府分配到地方时的有形流失,故选项A为正确答案。其他选项都只是实现千年目标、使用资金的一个方面,且过于武断,故不可选。
单选题 14.On which of the following would the author most probably agree?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】属信息推断题。选项A同第一段倒数第三句的意思不符,故选项A错误。根据原文第一段最后一句话,作者明确表示千年发展目标里没有提及到经济发展指标,故选项C错误。选项D过于绝对化,且在文中并未提及,故错误。作者在文章后半部分列举了很多非洲国家资金流失严重的例子和数据,故选项B最符合题意。
单选题 15.We may infer from the last paragraph that______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】属信息推断题。选项A利用原文关键词进行无关干扰,原文中并没有直接提及世界银行同乌干达政府治理资金流失问题的直接关系,故选项A错误。选项B与原文不符,原文提到在过去乌干达的资金流失问题十分严重,但之后乌干达政府做了很多工作,这一问题得到了改善,故选项B错误。选项C过于绝对,千年目标在扶贫、消除贫困中还是起到了一定的作用的。从最后一段最后一句话中我们能够推测出作者的引申意思,即认为千年发展目标在扶贫工作中起到的作用并不是想象中那么大,反倒不如倡导政府互相借鉴扶贫经验,故选项D为正确答案。