单选题 Robots have been the stuff of science fiction for so long that it is surprisingly hard to see them as the stuff of management fact. It is time for management thinkers to catch up with science-fiction writers. Robots have been doing menial jobs on production lines since the 1960s. The world already has more than 1 million industrial robots. There is now an acceleration in the rates at which they are becoming both cleverer and cheaper: an explosive combination.
Robots are learning to interact with the world around them. Their ability to see things is getting ever closer to that of humans, as is their capacity to ingest information and act on it. Tomorrow"s robots will increasingly take on delicate, complex tasks. And instead of being imprisoned in cages to stop them colliding with people and machines, they will be free to wander.
Until now executives have largely ignored robots, regarding them as an engineering rather than a management problem. This cannot go on: robots are becoming too powerful and ubiquitous . Companies certainly need to rethink their human-resources policies—starting by questioning whether they should have departments devoted to purely human resources.
The first issue is how to manage the robots themselves. An American writer, Isaac Asimov laid down the basic rule in 1942: no robot should harm a human. This rule has been reinforced by recent technological improvements: robots are now much more sensitive to their surroundings and can be instructed to avoid hitting people.
A second question is how to manage the homo side of homo-robo relations. Workers have always worried that new technologies will take away their livelihoods, ever since the original Luddites" fears about mechanised looms. Now, the arrival of increasingly humanoid automatons in workplaces, in an era of high unemployment, is bound to provoke a reaction.
Two principles—don"t let robots hurt or frighten people—are relatively simple. Robot scientists are tackling more complicated problems as robots become more sophisticated. They are keen to avoid hierarchies among rescue-robots (because the loss of the leader would render the rest redundant). They are keen to avoid duplication between robots and their human handlers. This suggests that the world could be on the verge of a great management revolution: making robots behave like humans rather than the 20th century"s preferred option, making humans behave like robots.
单选题 The second sentence implies that management thinkers should ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 推断题
根据题干关键词定位到第一段第二句。文章第一、二句提到“机器人被认为是科幻的事物已经太久了以至于把它们看作管理对象的事实惊人地难,现在管理思想家是赶上科幻作家的脚步的时候了”。浏览全文可知,文章主要讲人与机器人的管理,故C项“考虑更多关于人与机器人的关系”为正确答案。A项“把机器人变成了超级英雄和超级大坏蛋”、B项“给机器人取名字比如终结者”和D项“创造更多拥有超能力的机器人”均属于过度推断,原文未提,故排除。
单选题 Which of the following statements is true about robots?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 细节题
根据题干关键词定位到第二段。此段都在讲机器人的行为,第三句提到“以后的机器人能够逐渐从事精细复杂的工作”,故D项为正确答案。根据末句“代之把它们关进笼子以防与人类和机器对抗,机器人将会自由漫步”可知,A项后半句说法错误。第三句谈到“……它们摄取信息并对其做出反应的能力”,故B项错误。C项原文未提,故排除。
单选题 The word "ubiquitous" (Para. 3) probably means ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 含义题
根据题干关键词定位到文章第三段。ubiquitous意为“无处不在的,普遍存在的”,故B项“普遍的,无处不在的”为正确答案。A项“无数的”只强调了数量,并没有说明普遍性;C项“智能的,聪明的”;D项“复杂的”,均不是该词的正确释义,故排除。
单选题 To deal with the second problem, companies may not ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 推断题
根据题干关键词定位到第五段。根据第一、二句的信息可知“第二个问题是如何处理人与机器人关系中人类一边。工人们总是担心新技术会带走他们的生计……”,故A项“给职员展示坐在他们边上的机器人完全是一位帮手”说法太绝对,否认了机器人也是“威胁”的事实,故为该题的正确答案。B、C、D三项均客观地提到了机器人积极的作用,说法正确,故不选。
单选题 From the passage we can see that the author thinks homo-robo relations ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 推断题
此题实际是考查作者对人与机器人关系的看法。文中提到管理机器人可能会遇到的问题,并指出“随着机器人变得日益选进,机器人科学家们正在处理更复杂的问题”,需要一个重要的管理改革,故作者认为人类和机器人的关系是需要规范的,故D项为正确答案。A项“是侵略性的”、B项“带来担忧”和C项“变得有感情的”均不能准确地表达出二者的关系,故排除。