单选题 Sky-high gasoline prices aren"t just raising the cost of Eugene Marino"s 120-mile (193-kilometer) round-trip to his job in the Washington area. They"re reducing his wealth, too.
House prices in his rural subdivision beyond the Blue Ridge Mountains in Charles Town, West Virginia, have plunged as commuting expenses have soared. A four-bedroom home down the street from his is listed for $239,000, after selling new for $360,000 five years ago.
Homeowners in the exurbs aren"t the only ones whose assets have taken a hit because of the surge in energy costs. Companies such as General Motors Corp. are writing off billions of dollars in plants and equipment that are no longer viable in an age of dearer oil. The destruction of wealth and capital will weigh on U.S. growth for years to come.
"Our whole economy reflects the relative costs of energy: the cars we drive, the houses we occupy, the kinds of factories we have and the equipment in them," says Dana Johnson, chief economist at Comerica Bank in Dallas. "I"m expecting relatively large changes in all of these things."
The loss of wealth could be a double whammy for the U.S. economy. In the short run, it depresses demand as homeowners save more and spend less, and companies fire workers. Longer run, it curbs productivity growth, as firms shift their focus from increasing worker efficiency to reducing energy costs.
"At $4 per gallon gas, $125 per barrel oil and $10 per million Btu natural gas, a lot of activity becomes uneconomical," says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody"s Economy.com in West Chester, Pennsylvania.
The lifestyle of the exurban commuter may be one casualty.
Emerging suburbs and exurbs—commuter towns that lie beyond cities and their traditional suburbs—grew about 15 percent from 2000 to 2006, nearly three times as fast as the U.S. population, as Americans moved further out in search of more affordable houses or the bigger ones that are sometimes derided as McMansions.
"It was drive until you qualify for a mortgage," says Robert Lang, director of the Metropolitan Institute at Virginia Tech in Alexandria, Virginia. "You can"t do that anymore. Your cost of transportation will spike too much."
单选题 What change has been brought to Marino"s life?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 前两段以Marino的经历为例说明第3段首句提到的住在远郊的私房业主资产受损严重,因此D正确。原文只是说通勤费增加,但没有提及Marino因此而坐公交车上班,所以A不正确;第2段提到Marino所住的街区的房价暴跌,但这不意味着Marino从富有的住处“搬到”较穷的住处,因此B不正确;C与第2段最后一句的内容刚好相反。
单选题 Because the sharp increase in energy cost, General Motors Corp. has to ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 第3段第2句中的定语从句that are no longer viable表明通用汽车公司难以“养活”一些价值昂贵的工厂和设备,既然不能“养活”,就只好write off,由此我们可以推断write off的意思与“停止使用”最相近,B的cancel就含有“停止”的意思,因此本题应选B。原文中的no longer viable很重要,是推断write off的意思的关键。
单选题 Compared with the present, the loss of wealth will bring about ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 第5段第2句中的depresses demand,spend less等表明需求减少,购买力降低,这些都暗示市场萎缩,由此可见,本题应选A。C、D很具干扰性,C中的productivity和D中的efficiency在第5段第3句提及,要注意的是,it curbs productivity growth表明生产力的发展速度会减缓,这并不意味着生产力会下降,因此C是不正确的;同样道理,即使“公司关注的焦点不再是如何提高员工工作效率”,也不意味着工作效率会降低,D也不正确。
单选题 "Exurbs" most probably refers to ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 原文倒数第2段中的破折号内的内容是exurbs的定义,A是这个内容的近义改写,为本题答案。B最具干扰性,其中的rural一词在第2段第1句提及,关于commute(通勤)的内容在第2段、倒数第2段都有提及,但根据倒数第2段对exurbs的定义可以知道rural和commute都不是exurbs的重点特征。
单选题 According to Robert Lang, driving is considered ______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 最后一段Robert Lang的话暗示通勤者以前觉得从远郊驾车上下班比较经济,而现在油价飚升,驾车上下班的费用太高、不经济了,C中的wasteful意思与“不经济”最相近,因此C为本题答案。