单选题 {{B}}第二篇{{/B}}
Not content with its doubtful claim to produce cheap food for our own population, the factory farming industry also argues that "hungry nations are benefiting from advances made by the poultry(家禽) industry". In fact, rather than helping the fight against malnutrition(营养不良) in "hungry nations", the spread of factory farming has, inevitably aggravated the problem.
Large-scale intensive meat and poultry production is a waste of food resources. This is because more protein has to be fed to animals in the form of vegetable matte than can ever be recovered in the form of meat. Much of the food value is lost in the animal' s process of digestion and cell replacement. Neither, in the case of chicken, can one eat feathers, blood, feet or head. In all, only about 44% of the live animal fits to be eaten as meat.
This means one has to feed approximately 9~10 times as much food value to the animal than one can consume from the carcass. As a system for feeding the hungry, the effects can prove disastrous. At times of crisis, grain is the food of life.
Nevertheless, the huge increase in poultry production throughout Asia and Africa continues. Normally British or US firms are involved. For instance, an American based multinational company has this year announced its involvement in projects in several African countries. Britain's largest suppliers of chickens, Ross Breeder, are also involved in projects all over the world.
Because such trade is good for exports, Western governments encourage it. In 1979, a firm in Bangladesh called Phoenix Poultry received a grant to set up a unit of 6,000 chickens and 18,000 laying hens. This almost doubled the number of poultry kept in the country all at once.
But Bangladesh lacks capital, energy and food and has large numbers of unemployed. Such chicken-raising demands capital for building and machinery, extensive use of energy resources for automation, and involves feeding chickens with potential famine- relief protein food. At present, one of Bangladesh' s main imports is food grains, because the country is unable to grow enough food to feed its population. On what then can they possibly feed the chicken?
单选题 In this passage the author argues that______。
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[句义辨析] 原文首段已明确指出In fact,rather than helping the fight against malnutrition in“hungry nations,”the spread Of factory farming has,inevitably aggravated the problem,即工厂农业普及到亚、非国家实际上加剧了营养不良的问题,所以选项C是正确答案。选项D与原文相反,选项A、B与原文不一致,没有足够信息依据。
单选题 According to the author, in factory, vegetable food______。
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[主旨归纳] 原文第二段说明大规模的肉禽生产是浪费粮食资源。因为给动物(禽类)以蔬菜的形式喂进去的蛋白质要比以肉的形式转化出来的蛋白质多。因此,选项D是最接近这层含义的选项,是正确答案。
单选题 Western governments encourage the poultry in Asia because they regard it as au effective way to______。
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[概括大意] 原文第五段首句说明这样的贸易有利于出口,西方政府鼓励它。这里所说的贸易指的是西方的跨国公司向发展中国家普及其工厂农业,这当然有利于它们自己的出口,所以选项A是正确答案。
单选题 It is claimed that the factory farming industry is aimed at______。
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[句意剖析] 注意题干问的是the factory farming industry声称…。原文首段已说明argues that hungry nations are benefiting from advances made by the poultry industry,即它自己鼓吹粮食短缺的发展中国家可以从禽类工业取得的进展中获益,事实—亡,作者认为它不仅没解决营养不良问题,而使问题更加恶化,因此符合题干的选项是B。其他选项与原文不符。
单选题 What the last paragraph tells us is the author's______。
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[主旨归纳] 原文最后一段说明孟加拉国缺少条件也没有必要办厂养鸡,资金的投入、能源的大量消耗、为潜在饥荒备用的蛋、粮食的使用都无助于国家的发展,特别是因为孟加拉国还得进口粮食,那么他们喂鸡的粮食哪里来?由此可见,作者的态度很明了,选项C是正确答案。