单选题 When the summer sun shines down on the "dreaming spires" and elegant architecture of top universities Oxford and Cambridge, it's almost possible to forget they are more than just picturesque tourist magnets.
Alumni from the two ancient seats of learning still dominate Britain's cultural and political establishments, making up more than 80 percent of the judiciary, nearly half of top journalists, and 34 percent of senior government ministers.
That preeminence of "Oxbridge" graduates is widely accepted. But the thorny issue of the disproportionate representation on campus of students from advantaged backgrounds has again been stirring, prompting calls to ensure that Britain's leading universities reach out to a far broader range of top-notch students.
A leading education think tank has called on Oxford and Cambridge to emulate the Ivy League's recruitment of poorer students, while the government has thrown its weight behind new targets that will promote changes it says are overdue,
It has urged universities to take pupils' school and family backgrounds into account, and to set targets for the recruitment of more young people from underprivileged backgrounds.
The government also signaled interest in a future system where grades alone will also not be enough to win places at leading universities.
Fifty-seven percent of Oxbridge students come from government-funded state schools, even though they educate 90 percent of Britons. Privately run fee-charging independent schools make up the remaining bulk of Oxbridge's intake, despite educating just 7 percent of the population.
"There is no evidence that Oxford and Cambridge are socially discriminatory when it comes to admissions, " says Bahram Bekhradnia, director of the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI), who says their social profiles are largely the result of their demand for high grades and the performance Of pupils attending the different types of schools,
In response, Oxbridge highlights its scrupulously meritocratic approach to admissions, and suggests that the real problem lies with the inequities of the secondary school system.
The idea of targets for students from particular backgrounds also meets with opposition, even among students who have made it to Oxbridge from state schools.
Benjamin Storrs, a graduate of a comprehensive (state) school in Manchester, said he detected no sense of elitism after arriving at Oxford to study PPE (Philosophy, Politics, and Economics).
Mr. Storrs is providing home tutoring to pupils from Oxford city schools as part of a student-run charity aimed at children from refugee families and those seeking asylum.
Such work means the "enduring need" to demystify Oxford is heading in the right direction, according to Jonny Medland, the student union's access officer, who works alongside university officials to ensure prospective students receive information and support.
Oxford University alone spent ~ 2.8 million on outreach activities in 2008-2009, in addition to providing almost £ 5 million a year for bursarics.
Cambridge provides similar amounts, while both institutions have teamed up for initiatives such as open days for students from a variety of backgrounds at venues like the London stadium of the Premier League soccer team Arsenal. At these, academics and students attempt to debunk whatever myths may hold back some kids from applying.
But more must be done, according to the government, which is growing impatient with the selection of students on exam results alone.
"We hope that all universities will consider incorporating contextual data into their admissions processes better to assess the aptitude and potential of those from disadvantaged backgrounds, "said by Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, as he launched a new 10-year strategy for higher education in Parliament.
Responding, the Conservative opposition warned the government against engaging in "crudc class warfare, " while teachers from private schools also spoke out against the prospect of state intervention to force universities to accept more pupils from poorer backgrounds.
The nub of the problem, say many, is woefully declining educational standards at government-run schools.
Further complicating the picture are the record increases in students winning high grades and the rise in applications to Britain's top two universities, leading Oxford to introduce more prc-interview aptitude tests for applicants.
Without them, it would be impossible to differentiate potential interviewees between "the very best and the very good, " it says.
Although the conference argues the tests are not ones of knowledge or prior learning, their use has reportedly led to a rise of a"prep industry'providing private tutors who help teenagers negotiate the admissions process.
Both Oxford and Cambridge also insist the tests have little in common with older entrance exams that were scrapped in the past decade under pressure from state schools, which alleged they discriminated in favor of private-sector pupils.
Yet suggestions that entrance tests put applicants from state schools at a disadvantage were rejected by William Smith, a former state school pupil studying modern languages at Cambridge.
单选题 The author talks about the scenery and achievements of Oxford and Cambridge to
  • A. attract more tourists.
  • B. tell us the attraction of the universities.
  • C. ask people to pay more attention to their recruitment.
  • D. lead to the theme of the passage.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】推断题。由题干可以将本题定位在文章的第一段。在文章的第一段中作着对剑桥和牛津的景色做了描述,而在文章的笫二段,作者又对剑桥和牛津的成就做了说明,最后引出了这两所大学的招生问题。后面的内容与这两段内容上没有直接关系。可以说前两段的存在纯粹是为了引出后面的内容。这两段不过是引子。选项[D]是“为了引出文章的主题”,符合文意。 [避错] 选项[A]是“为了吸引游客”,文中并没有提到;选项[B]是“为了告诉我们这两所大学的吸引人的地方”,文中找不到相应的依据;选项[C]是“为了让人们注意他们的招生问题”,文中也没有相应的依据。
单选题 The Ivy League's recruitment is more proper than Oxford. They recruit
  • A. more preeminent students.
  • B. more poorer but clever studcnts.
  • C. students after figuring out their backgrounds.
  • D. students according to their grades.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】细节题。由题干中的Ivy League可以将本题定位在文章的第四段:“A leading education think tank has called on Oxford and Cambridge to emulate the Ivy League's recruitment of poorer students”,一个领先的教育智囊团呼吁剑桥和牛津向美国常春藤联盟学习,招收更多的贫困学生。这说明,相比较剑桥和牛津, 常春藤联盟招收了更多的贫困学生。选项[B]是“更多的虽然贫困但却聪明的学生”,在四个选项中,该选项基本符合文意,为正确答案。 [避错] 选项[A]是“更多优秀的学生”,不符合文意,排除;选项[C]是“在查看他们的背景之后录取”,文中找不到相应的依据;选项[D]是“根据学生的分数录取”,文中也没有相应的依据。
单选题 According to Oxford, who should take the responsibility of the disproportion of admissions?
  • A. Meritocracy.
  • B. The government.
  • C. The secondary school system.
  • D. The education system.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】细节题。由题干可以将本题定位在文章的第九段:“Oxbridge highlights its scrupulously meritocratic approach to admissions, and suggests that the real problem lies with the inequities of the secondary school system”,牛津和剑桥强调真正的问题在于中学学校系统的不平等。选项[C]是“中学教育系统”,符合文意,所以该选项为正确答案。 [避错] 选项[A]“英才教育”,选项[B]“政府”以及选项[D]“教育体系”均不符合文意。
单选题 What has Benjamin Storrs done to help Oxford and Cambridge recruit more widely?
  • A. Giving kids some guide to apply for the two universities.
  • B. Debunking myths that prevent kids from applying.
  • C. Helping kids collect information about top universities.
  • D. Teaching kids how to apply for top universities.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】推断题。由题干中的Benjamin Storrs可以将本题定位在文章的第十一到第十四段。第十四段说:“At these, academics and students attempt to debunk whatever myths may hold back some kids from applying.”,通过这些活动,学院和学生试图消除任何可能的神秘性,即那些可能阻止一些孩子申请这两所大学的神秘性。选项[B]是“消除阻止孩子申请这两所大学的神秘性”,符合文意,为正确答案。 [避错] 选项[A]是“指导学生申请这两所大学”,不符合文意;选项[C]是“帮助孩子收集一些名校的信息”,文中找不到相应的依据;选项[D]是“教孩子如何申请名校”,文中也没有相应的依据。
单选题 According to the passage, we can guess that students from private schools
  • A. demystify top universities.
  • B. perform better in all aspects.
  • C. make better performance in exams.
  • D. have more education opportunities.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】推断题。文章中先是就剑桥和牛津的招生问题做了说明,说来自贫困家庭的孩子占的比例很小,然后说到很多学生都来自私人学校。由此政府要求剑桥和牛津减少来自私人学校的学生的比例,而这遭到了很多人的不满,包括私人学校的老师等等,从这些可以看出,相对于公立学校的孩子,私立学校的孩子最起码被剑桥和牛津录取的机会要多一些。这也是教育机会的一种。因此选项[D]是“拥有更多的教育机会”,符合文意。 [避错] 选项[A]意思是“对名校没有神秘感”,从文中推理不出这个结论;选项[B]是“在所有方面都表现更好”,文中找不到相应的依据;选项[C]是“在所有考试中表现比公立学校学生好”,文中没有字眼可以推出这个结论。