单选题
When the summer sun shines down on the "dreaming
spires" and elegant architecture of top universities Oxford and Cambridge, it's
almost possible to forget they are more than just picturesque tourist
magnets. Alumni from the two ancient seats of learning still
dominate Britain's cultural and political establishments, making up more than 80
percent of the judiciary, nearly half of top journalists, and 34 percent of
senior government ministers. That preeminence of "Oxbridge"
graduates is widely accepted. But the thorny issue of the disproportionate
representation on campus of students from advantaged backgrounds has again been
stirring, prompting calls to ensure that Britain's leading universities reach
out to a far broader range of top-notch students. A leading
education think tank has called on Oxford and Cambridge to emulate the Ivy
League's recruitment of poorer students, while the government has thrown its
weight behind new targets that will promote changes it says are overdue,
It has urged universities to take pupils' school and family
backgrounds into account, and to set targets for the recruitment of more young
people from underprivileged backgrounds. The government also
signaled interest in a future system where grades alone will also not be enough
to win places at leading universities. Fifty-seven percent of
Oxbridge students come from government-funded state schools, even though they
educate 90 percent of Britons. Privately run fee-charging independent schools
make up the remaining bulk of Oxbridge's intake, despite educating just 7
percent of the population. "There is no evidence that Oxford
and Cambridge are socially discriminatory when it comes to admissions, " says
Bahram Bekhradnia, director of the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI), who
says their social profiles are largely the result of their demand for high
grades and the performance Of pupils attending the different types of schools,
In response, Oxbridge highlights its scrupulously meritocratic
approach to admissions, and suggests that the real problem lies with the
inequities of the secondary school system. The idea of targets
for students from particular backgrounds also meets with opposition, even among
students who have made it to Oxbridge from state schools.
Benjamin Storrs, a graduate of a comprehensive (state) school in Manchester,
said he detected no sense of elitism after arriving at Oxford to study PPE
(Philosophy, Politics, and Economics). Mr. Storrs is providing
home tutoring to pupils from Oxford city schools as part of a student-run
charity aimed at children from refugee families and those seeking
asylum. Such work means the "enduring need" to demystify Oxford
is heading in the right direction, according to Jonny Medland, the student
union's access officer, who works alongside university officials to ensure
prospective students receive information and support. Oxford
University alone spent ~ 2.8 million on outreach activities in 2008-2009, in
addition to providing almost £ 5 million a year for bursarics.
Cambridge provides similar amounts, while both institutions have teamed up for
initiatives such as open days for students from a variety of backgrounds at
venues like the London stadium of the Premier League soccer team Arsenal. At
these, academics and students attempt to debunk whatever myths may hold back
some kids from applying. But more must be done, according to
the government, which is growing impatient with the selection of students on
exam results alone. "We hope that all universities will
consider incorporating contextual data into their admissions processes better to
assess the aptitude and potential of those from disadvantaged backgrounds, "said
by Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, as he launched a new 10-year strategy
for higher education in Parliament. Responding, the
Conservative opposition warned the government against engaging in "crudc class
warfare, " while teachers from private schools also spoke out against the
prospect of state intervention to force universities to accept more pupils from
poorer backgrounds. The nub of the problem, say many, is
woefully declining educational standards at government-run schools.
Further complicating the picture are the record increases in students
winning high grades and the rise in applications to Britain's top two
universities, leading Oxford to introduce more prc-interview aptitude tests for
applicants. Without them, it would be impossible to
differentiate potential interviewees between "the very best and the very good, "
it says. Although the conference argues the tests are not ones
of knowledge or prior learning, their use has reportedly led to a rise of a"prep
industry'providing private tutors who help teenagers negotiate the admissions
process. Both Oxford and Cambridge also insist the tests have
little in common with older entrance exams that were scrapped in the past decade
under pressure from state schools, which alleged they discriminated in favor of
private-sector pupils. Yet suggestions that entrance tests put
applicants from state schools at a disadvantage were rejected by William Smith,
a former state school pupil studying modern languages at Cambridge.
单选题
The author talks about the scenery and achievements of Oxford and
Cambridge to
A. attract more tourists.
B. tell us the attraction of the universities.
C. ask people to pay more attention to their recruitment.
单选题
The Ivy League's recruitment is more proper than Oxford. They recruit
A. more preeminent students.
B. more poorer but clever studcnts.
C. students after figuring out their backgrounds.
D. students according to their grades.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】细节题。由题干中的Ivy League可以将本题定位在文章的第四段:“A leading education think tank has called on Oxford and Cambridge to emulate the Ivy League's recruitment of poorer students”,一个领先的教育智囊团呼吁剑桥和牛津向美国常春藤联盟学习,招收更多的贫困学生。这说明,相比较剑桥和牛津, 常春藤联盟招收了更多的贫困学生。选项[B]是“更多的虽然贫困但却聪明的学生”,在四个选项中,该选项基本符合文意,为正确答案。
[避错] 选项[A]是“更多优秀的学生”,不符合文意,排除;选项[C]是“在查看他们的背景之后录取”,文中找不到相应的依据;选项[D]是“根据学生的分数录取”,文中也没有相应的依据。
单选题
According to Oxford, who should take the responsibility of the
disproportion of admissions?
A. Meritocracy.
B. The government.
C. The secondary school system.
D. The education system.
【正确答案】
C
【答案解析】细节题。由题干可以将本题定位在文章的第九段:“Oxbridge highlights its scrupulously meritocratic approach to admissions, and suggests that the real problem lies with the inequities of the secondary school system”,牛津和剑桥强调真正的问题在于中学学校系统的不平等。选项[C]是“中学教育系统”,符合文意,所以该选项为正确答案。
[避错] 选项[A]“英才教育”,选项[B]“政府”以及选项[D]“教育体系”均不符合文意。
单选题
What has Benjamin Storrs done to help Oxford and Cambridge recruit more
widely?
A. Giving kids some guide to apply for the two universities.
B. Debunking myths that prevent kids from applying.
C. Helping kids collect information about top universities.
D. Teaching kids how to apply for top universities.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】推断题。由题干中的Benjamin Storrs可以将本题定位在文章的第十一到第十四段。第十四段说:“At these, academics and students attempt to debunk whatever myths may hold back some kids from applying.”,通过这些活动,学院和学生试图消除任何可能的神秘性,即那些可能阻止一些孩子申请这两所大学的神秘性。选项[B]是“消除阻止孩子申请这两所大学的神秘性”,符合文意,为正确答案。
[避错] 选项[A]是“指导学生申请这两所大学”,不符合文意;选项[C]是“帮助孩子收集一些名校的信息”,文中找不到相应的依据;选项[D]是“教孩子如何申请名校”,文中也没有相应的依据。
单选题
According to the passage, we can guess that students from private
schools