单选题
{{B}}(1){{/B}}
One busy day, I was racing around trying to get too much done, and I exclaimed to my three kids in the car, "We can get both things done and kill two birds with one stone!" My daughter Annie quietly suggested, "You mean feed two birds with one crumb, Mom, don't you?" I stopped short, realizing how steeped my language is in the culture of war. I had used "weapon" language without even knowing it. I was embarrassed and yet felt a grace: if a child can become conscious of using a new language of peace, then there is hope.
Think about the business language: strategies, bullets, high-caliber, power point; about win-lose sports language like "decimate", "attack", "destroy the other team", not to mention the movies and video games that simulate the most gruesome annihilations over and over. The lies of propaganda, one-sided media coverage, the alienation of others (those terrorists, the axis of evil), all part of the "collective psychic numbing" of our times. The biggest lie of all is that nuclear weapons are going to protect us. Nuclear weapons are an assault on our life, our planet, and on the Creator of the universe. It seems to afflict what our people could be as a result of the mess seeming too big to handle for the average person, disconnected and disempowered. When the world food programme for children equals 1/70th of the annual world military expense, we see what a crisis we are in.
Yet it inspired hope with the life examples of Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Nelson Mandela, Mother Teresa, Oscar Romero and others. Each spiritual leader lived the maxim, "no justice, no peace," nonviolently insisting on the truth, speaking truth to power without harming others or stripping their dignity. Imagine if we focused on this commonality, rather than what divides us; imagine if religions and religious leaders promulgated a global culture of peace and tolerance. We do not have to feel overwhelmed; that U. N. structures, NGO documents, UNESCO declarations, peoples' ideas for education exist already, that the internet is a rich source of counterculture information, connectedness and hope. Of what use is a vote or medical care in a war-torn society? A culture of war is like a house of cards; the house can fall and give rise, like the phoenix, to a new culture of peace. There are three fundamental ways to build a culture of peace: understand, participate, communicate. I'll bet our children can think of 50 more, going out and waging peace.
单选题 How does the author feel about the current culture?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 读完了整篇文章,我们发现作者的态度在第1、2段有鲜明的表现。我们能强烈地感受到作者对如今这种战争文化的反感和气愤。因此选项C“义愤填膺的”为正确答案。
单选题 What can we learn from the second paragraph?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 文章中只是提到电影和电子游戏中的暴力镜头,并没有提真实生活中的暴力,故排除A;文中说最大的一个谎言就是核武器是用来保护我们的,故C不对;军费开支巨大与存在军备竞赛并不构成直接的因果关系,D也不对。只有B符合文意。
单选题 By saying "imagine if religions and religious leaders promulgated… tolerance." (Line 5, Para.3) the author means ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 结合上下文我们发现作者在第3段列举了一些著名的人物,他们以非暴力方式争取自由和人权的事迹被人们歌颂。接下来作者感叹“假如……会怎样?”可见作者在呼唤大家向那些人物学习。D是对原文的反向描述。因此正确答案是 D。
单选题 The statement "A culture of war is like a house of cards" (Line 10, last paragraph) implies except______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 我们看它的上下文发现,它后面的一句话跟它联系颇为紧密:它会倒塌然后重生,就像凤凰涅磐变成一个崭新的和平的文明。由卡片搭成的房子肯定是不安全、不可靠、可以被摧毁的;至于它是否会引起战争,答案是肯定的,但不是这句话所表达的意思。因此根据题目要求我们选择C为正确答案。
单选题 From the passage we learn that the author is______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 我们看完了整篇文章感受到的是作者对和平的呼唤、对战争文化的声讨,因此可以确定她一定是爱好和平的人。至于她的职业和宗教信仰我们无法断定。因此选项A为正确答案。