问答题
3. In recent years, it is not uncommon that a college degree can not earn a college graduate a decent job while skilled workers from vocational schools are gaining in popularity with employers. The following is an article about this issue. Read it carefully and write an article of NO LESS THAN 300 words, in which you should: 1. summarize the article briefly, and then
2. express your opinion towards whether university education should be vocation-oriented.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks. Write your article on ANSWER SHEET FOUR. I saw an interview with Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz where he announced that the company would pay for most employees to get a degree online from Arizona State University. This seems like a benefit few of the company's employees would need. Aren't most of their
baristas (咖啡师) already people with worthless degrees?
The type I've described as Generation U (unemployed and underemployed). But it seems that Mr. Schultz is just echoing a sentiment that suggests that a college degree is required for most people to have a good career. This starts at the very top in America—the White House's education imperative states that "Earning a post-secondary degree or credential is a prerequisite for 21st century jobs."
But the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) estimates that only 27 percent of jobs in the U.S. economy currently require a college degree. By comparison, the U.S. Census Bureau reports that 47 percent of workers today have an associate degree or higher. But the BLS projects that the proportion of jobs requiring a college degree will barely change—increasing to only 27.1 percent by 2022. Even the most optimistic projection—a study from Georgetown University, projects that at most 35 percent of jobs will require a college degree by 2020.
While we're pushing more people to get college degrees, we're also facing a worsening shortage of skilled workers in many categories that don't require a college degree. In manufacturing, as many as 600,000 U.S. manufacturing jobs remained vacant across the U.S. due to shortages of skilled workers, according to the Manufacturing Institute's most recent "skills gap" report.
This situation exists across all categories of trades. A study by Manpower Group shows that the hardest segment of the workforce for employers to staff with skilled talent are the skilled trades—the welders, electricians, etc. who are so prevalent in manufacturing and construction. The hourly pay for a manufacturing worker is almost $24, compared to about $9 for a barista at Starbucks. Given that spread, one would think more people would seek work in manufacturing than settle for a job making coffee. But we've managed to create a culture where a college degree is supposedly a magical ticket to the good life, while vocational education is something to be sneered at. Consequently we now have the average college grad carrying a debt of almost $30,000 upon graduation and outstanding student loans of over a trillion dollars.
Even among those opting for college about a third pick majors that have very poor job prospects, including social sciences (11 percent), education (6 percent), psychology (7 percent), and visual and performing arts (6 percent). By contrast, only 2.4 percent pick computer science, 5 percent choose engineering, and 1.4 percent graduate with degrees in the physical sciences.
Yet, we do everything possible to encourage people to go to college. The federal Pell Grant program in the U.S. intended to help low and moderate-income students finance college—costs over $35 billion annually, though almost 40 percent of Pell Grant recipients never graduate.
【正确答案】[范文] Vocation-oriented University Education: Big No!
In the article, through various statistics, the author is inclined to make vocation education surpass university education, which to some extent echoes many Chinese people's sentiment that university education should be vocation-oriented. True, at present with the graduating population continuing to grow, it's getting much harder for university graduates to locate a satisfactory job. However, in making university education vocation-oriented, people could be making a huge mistake.
Universities play a more important role than vocation education. University education, along with primary and secondary school educations, should focus on the understanding about oneself. Human beings are not just born to learn how to feed themselves, but for other more important purposes. It is sad that in our world most people are so busy in sustaining a living that they can't fully understand and enjoy this ephemeral life. Our time in college is a crucial moment because it's a gateway into a world full of possibilities and challenges.
Another fact about university education is that although it offers education on job-related skills in certain fields, the one who receives this education doesn't necessarily get a job in the field. There is a very high percentage of people who change their careers in their lifetime, especially in younger years. At that time, their thoughts are immature, and they may have chosen a wrong major in college but they have the time to fix it later on. When university education is solely concerned with one's future jobs, there would be fewer choices in life for the college students because their knowledge is limited in a specific area.
One day there will come a time when human beings have so advanced technologies that they don't have to work to survive. Imagine then what would university education be about? Definitely not about one's future vocation, I'd say. That day may not be today, but the idea does give us a hint of what our university education should really focus on.
【答案解析】 题目给出一篇阅读文章,主要是关于大学文凭与就业及技能型人才匮乏这一现象展开思考。考生在总结文意时须注意不要被文中具体事例或数据所干扰,而应关注其主要思想。综合文意可知,文章作者偏向职业教育。根据题目要求,考生可采取以下的作文布局:
第一段:根据写作要求总结文章内容,随后提出个人观点——大学教育以职业为导向的做法错误至极。
第二段:从正面阐述大学教育比职业教育更重要——大学教育使我们更好地适应这个可能性与挑战并存的世界。
第三段:从反面进行论述——如果大学教育仅仅只是和未来的工作相关,那么我们的人生选择将存在局限。
第四段:展望人类不需要为了生存而工作的未来大学教育的发展方向,重申本文论点——大学教育不应该只关注职业教育。
[参考译文]
大学教育以职业为导向:万万不可!
阅读材料中,通过列举数据,作者倾向于使职业教育超过大学教育,这在一定程度上与许多国人的意见——大学教育应该以职业为导向——有共通之处。诚然,如今随着毕业人数与日俱增,现在的大学毕业生越来越难找到一份满意的工作。然而,如果使大学教育以职业为导向,人们可能会犯下一个大错。
大学扮演着比职业教育更重要的角色。小学教育、中等教育、大学教育,都应该重点关注对人自身的了解。人类生来不仅是为了衣食住行,而还有其他更重要的目的。可悲的是,世界上大多数人都太过于忙于生计,以致全然忘了理解和享受这稍纵即逝的一生。我们的大学时光很重要,因为这段时光是一扇大门,让我们迈入充满可能性与挑战的世界。
关于大学教育的另外一个事实就是:尽管大学教育在某些领域提供了与工作相关的技能教育,但是获得这种教育的学生并不一定就能在这个领域找到一份工作。一生当中人们改变职业的可能性很大,尤其是年轻的时候。这个时候他们的想法是不成熟的,在大学的时候,人们有可能选择了错误的专业,但是随后他们有时间做出改变。如果大学教育仅仅只和未来的工作有关,那么大学生的人生选择会越来越少,因为他们的知识只是局限在某个特定领域。
也许在未来的某一天,人类会发明先进的技术,这样他们就不用为了生存而工作。试想一下,那时的大学教育的内容是什么?要我说的话,肯定不是关于人们以后的职业。那样的日子肯定不是今天就到来,但是这种观点确确实实就大学教育的关注点给了我们提示。