单选题 How living creatures evolve has been pretty well understood for the past 150 years. How they came to exist in the first place, though, remains a mystery. Part of the reason for this mystery is that subsequent evolution has done a good job of erasing the evidence. But not a complete one. Some features are shared by all organisms, and may thus go back to the beginning of life. And one of the most bizarre of these features is that a lot of the molecules of which life is made are left-handed.
A left-handed molecule is one that causes polarized light to rotate to the left (i.e., anticlockwise). Most molecules which behave this way have a right-handed equivalent that is, in its arrangement of atoms, their mirror image. Ordinary chemical processes cannot tell the difference between the two forms, so they are usually equally abundant. But the enzymes that govern biochemistry are such precise tools that, often, only one-handedness is acceptable. In the case of amino acids, the subunits of which proteins are made, the acceptable form is the sinister one. Many people feel that understanding why this is so would illuminate the origin of life—and two groups of researchers, pursuing separate lines of enquiry, have come up with what may be the pieces of the jigsaw.
One further puzzle is that the amino acids found in meteorites (which are assumed to be similar to those of the primitive Earth) have been modified by a process called methylation into a form that is biologically useless. Nevertheless, since such methylated amino acids are the starting point, it is where Ronald Breslow and his student Mindy Levine, who work at Columbia University, started.
A couple of years ago they revealed the first piece of the jigsaw when they found that an initial imbalance in favor of left-handed methylated amino acids in a solution can be amplified by repeated evaporation. During evaporation, the left-and right-handed molecules mate up and fall out of solution, leaving a left-handed excess. A mere two cycles of evaporation can push a starting ratio that is just 1% in favor of the left to one that is 90% left-handed.
Now, as Dr. Breslow has revealed to a meeting of the American Chemical Society, in New Orleans, Ms. Levine has discovered a process that favors the production of left-handed biologically active amino acids. The presence of copper in solutions that contain the chemical precursors of amino acids, together with left-handed methylated amino acids to seed the reaction, gives amino-acid formation a sinister bias. When Ms. Levine made an amino acid called phenylalanine this way she got 37% more of the left-handed form than the right-handed. With another, valine, the excess was 23% and with alanine, 20%.
The connection between the two pieces of work is that the left-handed methylated amino acids required to seed the second could have been provided by the evaporative process of the first—if, of course, a slightly biased supply of them had previously existed.
This is where Sandra Pizzarello of Arizona State University comes in. She has shown that the methylated amino acids found in meteorites do, indeed, have a bias of 1% or more in favor of the left-handed, suggesting that methylated amino acids kicking around on the primitive Earth would have shared a similar bias.
The mistake previous researchers made, therefore, was thinking of the methylated amino acids of meteorites as ingredients of life. Actually, if this work is pointing in the right direction, they were merely seeds. Taken together, these results argue that life formed in places with a lot of evaporation going on (suggesting heat) and a significant amount of copper present. This is speculation, of course, but it favors the idea that living things were created in land-locked ponds, rather than at sea, and probably in a volcanic environment. (Volcanic heat would drive the chemical reactions, as well as causing lots of evaporation.) It also suggests that biochemical left-handedness confers no selective advantage. What makes meteoritic amino acids left-handed has yet to be discovered. But it seems just a matter of chance that the living world is sinister.
单选题 What can be inferred from the results of the studies by Ronald Breslow and Mindy Levine?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 第6段第1句提到,第二项研究中的原料……可由第一项研究中的……提供,C是该句的同义表述,为正确选项。A与第4段末句不符;第5段第2句提到溶液中除了铜以外,还包含左旋甲基化氨基酸,故B不符;而D与第6段首句明显不符。
单选题 Sandra Pizzarello suggests that methylated amino acids found in meteorites ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 第7段提到,陨星中发现的甲基化氨基酸存在1%或以上的左旋分子的偏倚,可直接得出答案为B。A的信息点出现在第8段,是此前研究者的错误观点;C不能从文章表述得出;D与第7段最后一句的表述不符,原文是说“可能也享有相似的偏倚”,而D却表示“有一样的偏倚”。
单选题 From the description in the passage, we learn that ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 最后一段提到,生命形成于存在大量蒸发现象和存在大量铜元素的地方,D的表述与原文意思相同,为正确选项。第1段提及进化的证据并未被完全抹掉,A的表述与此不符;B与第2段中在生物化学界占支配地位的酶只接受左旋或右旋其中之一种的表述不符;最后一段提到,如果这项工作指向正确方向,左旋甲基化氨基酸可能是生命的开端,而C的表达过于肯定。