.  Monkeys and chimpanzees, although they are weaker and less fierce than many other animals, possess brains which are far along the evolutionary road as any creature other than man. Birds can perform marvels of aerobatics, they can catch insects on the wing with unparalleled skill, navigate in a remarkable manner half round the world and back—but they can cannot think and reason. In technical terms it can be said that they are lacking in insight. The abilities which they do possess are built-in instincts derived from their genetic inheritance. Monkeys, on the other hand, can reason. They can easily remember a lighted door indicating the presence of food. They can remember what kind of food they are looking for. A monkey set the problem of reaching a banana, say, hung high up in its cage, can work out a system for getting it even if it involves piling up boxes to stand on and then knocking down the banana with a stick. A charming story is told about the psychologist Wolfgang Kobler, who had provided various boxes and other apparatuses by which he proposed to test a chimpanzee's ability to think out a method of reaching a fruit hung nine feet in the air. The animal looked about it and sized up the problem. Then it took Kobler by the hand, led him to a position immediately under the banana, jumped upon to his shoulder and reached it down from there.
    But evolution, although it has brought monkeys to a remarkable degree of cleverness, has stopped short at a crucial ability, the possession of which places man at a clearly superior level. Their minds cannot cope with abstract ideas. For example, an ape can be taught to fill a can with water from a barrel and take the can of water to put out a fire so that it can reach into a box and get food. But if the whole set-up is arranged on a raft the animal will continue to draw its water only from the barrel. It cannot grasp that any water, taken more, conveniently, say, from the pond on which the raft is floating, will putout the fire just as well. The abstract idea that water puts out fire is beyond it. The abstract idea that water puts out fire is beyond it.1.  Birds owe their remarkable abilities to ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】 本文讨论的是人类和动物在大脑进化上的区别,动物缺乏洞察力,不能理性思考。虽然黑猩猩能够学会做一系列的行为,但也不能理解抽象的概念。
   推断题。题目问的是鸟类卓越的飞行技能是因为什么。定位到第一段第二句,鸟类之所以有卓越的飞行技能主要归功于其导航能力,因为“...they can navigate in a remarkable manner half round the world and back...”如果没有这种卓越的导航能力,即使飞半个地球,也绝不可能飞回原地。故选D。
[参考译文] 猴子和猩猩,虽然他们比许多其他动物更虚弱更不具有攻击性,却拥有除了人类以外,比任何动物都进化得更好的大脑。鸟可以执行神奇的飞行特技,他们能用无与伦比的技术翅膀捕捉昆虫,并以惊人的方式绕行世界半周再飞回来——但他们不能理性思考。从技术层面来讲,他们缺乏洞察力。他们拥有的能力是来自于他们的遗传基因,是天生的。然而,猴子具有思维能力。他们能很容易记住一个亮着的指示食物存在的门。他们能记得他们要寻找什么食物。一只猴子能够解决如何拿到香蕉的问题。比如香蕉高高悬挂在笼子里,它们可以制定一个拿到香蕉的方案,即使这个过程需要堆放箱子,站上去,然后用棍子敲打一根香蕉。有一个有趣的故事是关于心理学家沃尔夫冈·科布勒的,为了要测试黑猩猩思考出够到挂在空中9英尺处水果的能力,他提供了各种箱子还有其他的设备。黑猩猩看着香蕉,然后就思考解决方案。然后它牵着科布勒的手,将他带到香蕉的正下方,跳到他的肩上,够到了香蕉。
   但是进化,即使它赋予猴子惊人的智慧,但却没有赋予它们一个关键的能力,而这在这个能力上人类拥有一个明显的优势。猴子的头脑无法应付抽象观念。例如,猿猴可以学会从桶里舀一瓶水出来,然后用这瓶水灭火,这样它就可以进入一个盒子中得到食物了。但如果整个装置安装在筏上,这个动物将继续从桶中舀水。它不能理解,采取更方便的方式,也就是,在漂浮的木筏上从池塘里得到更多的水,一样可以将火熄灭。水灭火这种抽象的理念是它们不能理解的。