单选题 Encouragement and praise can come in many forms, and some ways are better for child development than others. Researchers at the University of Chicago and Stanford University who studied mother-child interactions over the course of several years found that the type of praise children receive affects their attitudes toward challenges later in life. Specifically, praise that came with feedback about their behavior and the choices that toddlers made helped them to cope better with difficult experiences five years later, compared with compliments that focused more on the child himself, like "You're a good boy." The study, which appears in the journal Child Development, is the first major study of praise and childhood development done outside of a lab setting. In the study, researches found that the children who grew up with more process praise (comments such as "You worked really hard" or "You're doing a great job," which emphasize the child's actions.) were more open to challenge, and were able to identify more ways of overcoming difficult problems. They were also more likely to say that they could improve their intelligence with hard work. While person praise (comments like "You're so smart" or "You're so good," which focus on a child's inherent qualities.) didn't seem to have any negative effect on the children, the study suggests that process praise teaches children that their talents and abilities can be developed and improved, while person praise sends the message that their abilities are fixed and therefore not easily altered. "This study is monumental," says Carol Dweck, a co-author of the study and a professor at Stanford University whose earlier research laid the foundation for understanding the role of praise in child development. Another revelation from the study involved how praise affects boys and girls differently. Parents gave boys and girls the same amount of praise, but of the encouragement boys received, 24% was process praise, while girls received only 10% of this type. Previous research suggested this pattern, but Gunderson, an assistant professor of psychology at Temple University, says she was surprised by how great the difference was. The inequality could have consequences for how girls evaluate their abilities as they progress in school and may play a role in aggravating some of the self-esteem issues that become more common among teens and adolescents. The findings send a clear message to parents. "The biggest takeaway is that parent praise matters," Dweck says. "The parents, even when the children are very young, are starting to shape the child's motivation, the children's attitudes toward themselves and their stance to the world." Not all praise, it seems, is equal.
单选题 It can be learned from the first two paragraphs that _____.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:根据题干可直接定位到第一、第二段。第一段①句开门见山,指出鼓励和表扬有多种方式,而且对孩子的发展影响不同。第二段开头的Specifically一词表明第二段是对第一段的具体说明,进一步指出具体某种表扬方式能让孩子日后更好地处理困难情况,故确定B项正确。
单选题 We can infer from Paragraph 3 that _____.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】解析:根据题干可直接定位到第三段。该段详细讲述了研究的结果,对比了process praise“行为表扬”及person praise“个人表扬”的影响。该段前两句提到,受到行为表扬多的孩子,更敢于应对挑战,应对困难的方法也更多,也更有可能认为他们可以通过努力来提升智力,这些是person praise所没有的,故D项的概括正确。
单选题 Carol Dweck's attitude toward the study is _____.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】解析:根据题干中的人名Carol Dweck可定位到第四段。本题考查的是Carol Dweck对前三段提到的研究持什么态度。从该段中的This study is monumental“该研究是意义重大的”可看出Carol Dweck对该研究的态度是积极的,故B项为正确答案。
单选题 According to Paragraph 5, which of the following is true of girls?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】解析:根据题干可直接定位到第五段。该段①句就提到表扬对男孩和女孩的影响存在差异,②句对比了两者受到的process praise数量上的差异,从两个百分比数字(24%和10%)可以看出,女孩受到的行为表扬数量要低于男孩所受到的行为表扬数量,故C项为正确答案。
单选题 By saying "Not all praise, it seems, is equal", the author implies that_____.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】解析:题干中的直接引语为全文的最后一句。统观全文,可知文章主要讲的是不同的表扬类型(本文重点在对比process praise及person praise)对孩子会产生不同的影响,所以作者说“似乎不是所有表扬都是平等的”,结合文章的写作意图,不难看出本文是想表明表扬孩子的方式有差异,存在优劣,故A项为正确答案。