单选题 Forget about the spurious benefits of eating shark fin soup, a traditional Asian delicacy that is said to be responsible for the needless destruction of some 73 million sharks a year. In Palau, the first country in the world to proclaim a shark sanctuary, the sharks that frequent the Pacific island country's reefs generate enormous financial benefits. A single reef shark can contribute almost US $ 2 million in its lifetime to the economy of Palau.
The analysis quantified the economic benefits of the shark-diving industry to the Pacific island nation and found that its value far exceeded that of shark fishing. A research focused on hundreds of reef sharks that frequent the five major dive sites in Palau. The study did not take into account the sharks in Palau waters that do not regularly visit the dive sites. Because of their low rates of reproduction and late maturity, shark populations have been driven into a global decline due to fishing. Yet the study shows that these animals on top of the ecosystem can contribute far more as a tourism resource than as a catch target.
Findings from the study, which looked at the reef sharks observed at Palau's major dive sites, include:
The estimated annual value to the tourism industry of an individual reef shark that frequents these sites was US $179, 000, or US $1.9 million over its lifetime.
Shark diving brings approximately US $18 million annually to the Palauan economy, approximately eight percent of the country's gross domestic product.
The annual income in salaries paid by the shark-diving industry was an estimated US $1.2 million; and the annual tax income to Palau generated by shark diving was approximately 14 percent of the country's business tax revenue.
Globally, up to 73 million sharks are killed every year primarily for their fins, which are used in the Asian delicacy shark fin soup. The Pacific Island States have been among the first to recognize the danger of this unsustainable rate of consumption. In 2009, Palan President Johnson Toribiong declared Palauan waters to be a shark sanctuary in his address to the United Nations General Assembly. Since then, the US state of Hawaii, the territories of Guam and the Northern Marianas, and the Republic of the Marshall Islands all banned the possession, sale or distribution of shark fins.
Shark tourism can be a viable economic engine. Overfishing of sharks can have disastrous effects on ocean ecosystems, but this study provides a compelling case that can convince more countries to embrace these animals for their benefit to the ocean and their value to a country's financial well-being.

单选题 By comparison, ______ can generate more economic benefits.
A. shark fishing B. shark eating
C. shark diving D. shark killing
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】细节题。第二段第一句的The analysis quantified the economic benefits of the shark-diving industry to the Pacific island nation and found that its value far exceeded that of shark fishing证实C正确。
单选题 The message the writer attempts to convey throughout the passage is that______
A. eating shark fin soup is hazardous
B. overfishing of sharks can have disastrous effects on ocean ecosystems
C. more countries should declare their waters to be a shark sanctuary
D. a balanced ecosystem is a win-win situation
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】推断题。A在第一段提及,但并非作者的主要意图,况且hazardous指的是dangerous, especially to people's health,喝鱼翅汤不会对身体不好,故A错误。B在最末段提到,不是作者主要想表达的意思。在倒数第二段提到许多国家推出了保护鲨鱼的政策法规,即使作者希望更多的国家效仿,但也不是作者在文中想要表达的主要意思。从全文内容可以推断,作者将鲨鱼的经济效益在捕猎和鲨鱼旅游业之间作了对比,突出了保护海洋生态系统对人类经济的贡献,说明了双赢的局面,所以D才是作者想通过文章表达的主旨。
单选题 In Palau, shark fishing is______
A. forbidden by the government
B. a traditional practice in fishing industry
C. not a catch target
D. favoured by fishermen
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】推断题。A、B和D全文都没有提及,但从文章内容可以推断帕劳群岛宣布了保护鲨鱼的政策,开发了关于鲨鱼的旅游业,并从中获得巨大经济效益,由此可见鲨鱼在帕劳群岛并非是捕猎的对象,C为最合适答案。
单选题 According to the passage, which of the following statements is NOT true?
A. The research studied the reef sharks in Palau waters.
B. About 73 million sharks are killed every year.
C. Shark fins are Asians' favourite delicacy.
D. The study's finding is convincing.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】细节题。从原文第二段的focused on hundreds of reef sharks that frequent the five major dive sites in Palau. The study did not take into account the sharks in Palau waters that do not regularly visit the dive sites可以判断研究并不是将所有帕劳群岛的鲨鱼作为研究对象,仅仅在主要潜水区域的鲨鱼是研究对象,故A错误。B在第一段第一句提及。从第一段和倒数第二段可以推断鱼翅是亚洲的上等菜肴,故C成立。文章列举了研究的结果和各项数据以及比较结果,很有说服力,D成立。