问答题 {{U}}Bracken fern has been spreading from its woodland strongholds for centuries,{{/U}} but the rate of encroachment into open countryside has lately increased alarmingly throughout northern and western Britain. A tough competitor, bracken {{U}}reduces the value of grazing land{{/U}} by crowding out other vegetation. The fern is itself poisonous to livestock, and also encourages proliferation of sheep ticks, which {{U}}not only attack sheep but also transmit diseases{{/U}}. No less important to some people are bracken's effects on threatened habitats and on the use of uplands for recreational purposes, even though many appreciate its beauty. {{U}}Biological controls may be the only economic solution.{{/U}} One potentially cheap and self-sustaining method of halting the spread of bracken is to introduce natural enemies of the plant. Initially unrestrained by predators of their own, foreign predators are likely to be able to multiply rapidly and overwhelm intended targets. Because bracken occurs throughout the world, there is plenty of scope for this approach. Two candidates, both moths from the Southern Hemisphere, are now being studied. {{U}}Of course, biological control agents can safely be released only if it can be verified that they feed solely on the target weed. The screening tests have so far been fraught with difficulties.{{/U}} The first large shipment of moths succumbed to a disease. Growing enough bracken indoors is difficult, and the moths do not readily exploit cut stems. These are common problems with rearing insects for biological control. {{U}}Other problems can be foreseen. Policymakers need to consider many factors and opinions such as the cost of control compared to existing methods, and the impact of the clearance of bracken on the landscape, wildlife, and vegetation.{{/U}} In fact, scientists already have much of the information needed to assess the impact of biological control of bracken, but it is spread among many individuals, organizations, and government bodies. The potential gains for the environment are likely to outweigh the losses because few plants, insects, mammals, and birds live associated only with bracken, and many would benefit from a return of other vegetation or from a more diverse mosaic of habitats. But legal consequences of attempts at biological control present a potential minefield. For example, many rural tenants still have the right of "estoyers", the right to cut bracken as bedding for livestock and uses. What would happen if they were deprived of these rights? Once a biological control agent is released, it is difficult to control its speed. What consideration is due landowners who do not want to control bracken? According to law, the release of the biological control agents must be authorized by the secretary of state for the environment. But Britain lacks the legal and administrative machinery to assemble evidence for and against release.
【正确答案】欧洲蕨从它的森林地大本营向外扩散蔓延已经有好几个世纪了。但是它们侵占空旷的乡村地区的速度最近在不列颠的整个西北部地区却是令人担心地加快了。作为一个强有力的竞争者,欧洲蕨通过将其他植被挤出而降低牧地的价值。这一类蕨本身对于牲畜就是有毒的,此外还有助于羊虱(一种昆虫)的繁殖,这种昆虫不但袭击羊群,而且还传播疾病。对某些人同样重要的是欧洲蕨对受威胁的栖息地以及对以娱乐为目的的高地使用所产生的影响,尽管许多人欣赏它的美丽。 生物控制法可能是唯一可行的经济的解决方法。一种潜在廉价的以及可自续的阻止欧洲蕨蔓延的方法就是引入这类植物的天敌。外来的捕食者由于最初不会受到它自身的捕食者的限制,很可能急剧地繁殖激增,压倒预定的目标。由于欧洲蕨遍及世界各地,因而这一方法有着广阔的前景。正在研究的两种可选种类都是南半球的飞蛾。 当然,生物控制物只有在如下条件下才被安全地释放出来,即此生物仅仅以目标杂草为食这一情况得到确凿验证。筛选实验至今为止充斥着困难。第一批大规模引入的蛾子都死于疾病。在室内种植足够多的欧洲蕨是很困难的,而蛾子也不易利用采割下来的干茎。这些是为了生物控制而养殖昆虫的普遍问题。 其他问题也可被预见到。决策者必须考虑诸多因素和意见,例如与现有的方法相比生物控制的成本,清除欧洲蕨后对风景、野生生物和植物所产生的影响。事实上,科学家们已经掌握了评估对欧洲蕨进行生物控制所可能产生的影响的大量所需信息,但这些信息散落于许多个人、组织和政府团体中。对环境的潜在益处可能会大于潜在损失,这是因为几乎没有任何植物、昆虫、哺乳动物及鸟类的生存只与欧洲蕨有关,而许多终将受益于其他植物的回归或受益于物种丰富多样的栖息地分布。但是,进行生物控制方法的尝试,其法律后果却是一个潜在的危险区域。例如,许多乡村的居民依然拥有“必需的供应品”这一权利,他们享有割取欧洲蕨为牲畜作睡铺或其他用途的权利。如果他们被剥夺这些权利,将发生怎样的后果呢?一旦一只生物控制物被释放,就很难控制它的传播速度了。对于那些并不想控制欧洲蕨的土地所有者来说,他们是怎样考虑的呢?根据法律,生物控制物的释放必须由州环境国务大臣批准,但是,英国却缺乏法律的和行政的机制来收集允许释放和反对释放控制物的证据。
【答案解析】