PASSAGE THREE
(1) Reading award-winning literature may boost your ability to read other people, a new study suggests. Researchers at the New School for Social Research, in New York City, found that when they had volunteers read works of acclaimed “literary fiction” it seemed to temporarily improve their ability to interpret other people‘s emotions. The same was not true of nonfiction or “popular” fiction, the mystery, romance and science-fiction books that often dominate bestseller lists.
(2) Experts said the findings, reported online in Science, suggest that literature might help people to be more perceptive and engaged in their lives.
(3) “Reading literary fiction isn‘t just for passing the time. It‘s not just an escape,” said Keith Oatley, a professor emeritus of cognitive psychology at the University of Toronto. “It also enables us to better understand others, and then take that into our daily lives.”
(4) Oatley was not involved in the new research, but worked on some of the first studies to suggest that reading literature can boost people‘s empathy for others. His team has found that those who read a lot of fiction tend to show greater empathy on standard tests, but the same is not true of avid nonfiction fans.
(5) But, the study by Oatley and his team cannot prove that literature boosts empathy—empathetic folks may just be drawn to reading fiction, whereas the new study does offer some “cause-and-effect” evidence, Oatley said. For the study,researchers set up a series of five experiments in which participants read either literary fiction, popular fiction, nonfiction or nothing at all before taking some standard tests. One of the tests is known as “Reading the Mind in the Eyes”. People have to look at photos of actors‘ eyes, and then guess what emotion is being expressed in each. The test is considered a measure of empathy. Overall, study participants fared better on the test after reading literary fiction, versus the other three conditions.
(6) It was a small improvement, according to the principal researcher David Comer Kidd, “It‘s not like taking people from a (grade) ‘C’to an‘A’,” he said. But, Kidd added, the effect was seen after only about 10 minutes‘ reading, and it was a statistically strong finding, meaning it‘s unlikely to have been due to chance.
(7) “Literary” fiction has no hard-and-fast definition. So Kidd and his colleagues chose contemporary works that have won or been finalists for outstanding literary awards. They included “The Round House”, by Louise Erdrich, “Salvage the Bones”, by Jesmyn Ward and the short story “Corrie” by Alice Munro. And “popular” fiction included best-sellers like “Gone Girl” by Gillian Flynn, and Danielle Steel‘s “The Sins of the Mother”.
(8) What‘s so special about literary fiction? “For one, it‘s usually more focused on characters than on plot,” Kidd noted. But beyond that, he said, there is usually no single “authoritative narrator” who takes us through the story. “It demands that the reader almost become a writer and fill in the gaps. You really have to think about the characters,” Kidd said.
(9) Oatley agreed. “Alice Munro doesn‘t tell you what to think,” he said. “You, yourself, have to make inferences about characters. And that‘s often what we‘re doing in our real-life conversations.” Or at least that‘s what people could do.
(10) Reading literary fiction could also offer a way to “practice” your social skills and use them more in real life,according to another researcher not involved in the study. “It‘s like how pilots train in a flight simulator,” said Raymond Mar, an associate professor of psychology at York University, in Toronto, who has collaborated with Oatley. “This is a great study,” Mar said of the new study. But he added that the overall research in this area is “still in its infancy” and one key question is whether literary fiction really is better than other fiction.
(11) Mar and his colleagues recently found that fans of romance novels tended to do best on tests of empathy. Unlike the current study, Mar‘s study did not test people after having them read different types of fiction. So it‘s possible that there is something else about romance-novel readers that makes them more understanding of others.
(12) Still, according to Mar, it‘s too early to tell people to trade in their Danielle Steel for Alice Munro, at least if the goal is boosting empathy.
(13) It‘s also possible that plays, movies or even TV shows could build your empathy muscles, according to Kidd. But reading may be special, he said, because it provides no visuals and you have to engage your imagination more.
(14) Everyone agreed that the findings suggest literature is important beyond entertainment or improving vocabulary.“There‘s a common belief that reading literature is frivolous, or not practical,”Mar said. “But there‘s a growing body of evidence that it‘s important in skills that we need in our lives.”
According to the new study, what kind of books are likely to help people better understand others‘ feelings?
文章第一段第二句提到“... found that when they had volunteers read works of acclaimed “literary fiction” it seemed to temporarily improve their ability to interpret other people‘s emotions”, 研究人员发现, 当志愿者阅读广受好评的文学小说时, 他们解读他人情绪的能力似乎暂时得到了提高。 由此可知, 文学小说有可能帮助人们更好地理解他人感受, 故选 C。
Which of the following statements is CORRECT according to the passage?
文章第七段第二句提到“So Kidd and his colleagues chose contemporary works that have won or been finalists for outstanding literary awards”, 基德和同事们选择了获得或者最终入围优秀文学奖项的当代作品。 由此可知, 基德和他的团队让参与者们阅读是享有盛誉的小说, 故选 C。
Which of the following is NOT a special feature of literary fiction?
文章第八段第三句提到“... there is usually no single “authoritative narrator” who takes us through the story”,文学小说通常并不存在一个“权威叙述者” 带领读者看完整个故事。 B 选项表述与原文不符, 故选 B。
【全文翻译】
(1) 一项新研究表明, 阅读获奖文学作品可能会让你把人心看得更加透彻。 纽约新社会研究学院的研究人员发现, 当志愿者阅读广受好评的“文学小说” 时, 他们解读他人情绪的能力似乎暂时得到了提高。 但当志愿者阅读纪实作品或“通俗” 小说时, 也就是经常占据畅销榜首的悬疑小说、 言情小说和科幻小说, 情况就不是这样了。
(2) 专家表示, 这一发表在《科学》 杂志网络版上的研究结果表明, 阅读文学作品可能会使人们更有洞察力, 更加投入生活。
(3)“阅读文学作品不仅仅是为了打发时间, 也不仅仅是一种逃避, ” 多伦多大学认知心理学荣誉退休教授基思· 奥特利说道, “阅读这些作品还能帮助我们能够更好地理解他人, 并将其融入日常生活。”
(4) 奥特利教授没有参与这项新研究, 但他参与了一些早期的研究, 这些研究表明读小说能激发人们的同情心。 他的团队发现, 爱读小说的人在测试中通常表现出更强的同情心, 而爱读纪实作品的人却并非如此。
(5) 但是, 奥特利教授说道, 他们之前的研究无法证明文学作品一定能增强同情心——可能只是有同情心的人恰好被小说吸引, 然而这项新研究却提供了一些证据。 研究人员为这项研究设置了五项实验, 在实验过程中参与者接受标准测试之前, 要么读文学小说, 要么读通俗小说, 要么读纪实作品, 要么什么都不读。 其中一项测试被称为“读心术”。 人们照片上演员的眼睛, 猜测其中表达的情绪。 人们认为这项测试是一种估测同情心的方式。 总体而言, 与其他三种情况相比, 阅读文学小说之后再接受测试的参与者表现得更好。
(6) 根据首席研究员大卫· 科默· 基德所说, 这只是一个小小的进步, 不像把人们的成绩从 C 提高到 A 那样。 但基德教授补充道, 这种效果在短短十分钟左右就能看到了, 这个发现是有着有力的数据统计支撑的, 并不是偶然的。
(7)“文学小说没有明确的区分。 所以基德和其他研究人员们选择了获得或者入围优秀文学奖项的当代作品,包括路易丝· 厄德里奇的《圆屋》、 杰丝米妮· 瓦德的《拾骨》 和爱丽丝· 门罗的短篇小说《科里》, 通俗小说包括吉莉安· 弗林的《消失的爱人》 和丹妮尔· 斯蒂尔的《母亲的罪恶》 等畅销书。
(8) 文学小说有什么特别之处? 基德指出,“一方面, 文学小说通常更注重人物本身, 而不是情节; 另一方面, 文学小说中一般并不存在一个“权威叙述者” 带领读者看完整个故事。 这要求读者把自己想象成作者, 填补空白。 你必须要思考的是小说中的人物。”
(9) 奥特利教授表示赞同。“爱丽丝·门罗不会告诉你该怎么想, ”教授说道,“你自己必须对人物进行思考。而这也是我们在现实生活中经常做的, 或者这至少是人们可以做的。
(10) 根据另一位没有参与这项研究的研究人员, 阅读文学小说还可以锻炼社交技巧, 并将其更多地运用到现实生活中去。 与奥特利教授合作的多伦多约克大学心理学副教授雷蒙德· 马尔说道, “这就像飞行员在模拟飞行器中训练一样。” 他在谈到这项新研究时表示, 这是一项伟大的研究。 但他也补充说, 这一领域的研究整体上仍然处于起步阶段, 并且还有一个关键问题, 那就是文学小说是否真的比其他小说更好。
(11)最近马尔和他的同事们发现, 爱情小说的书迷在同情心测试中通常表现最好。 与目前的研究不同的是,在马尔的研究中, 他没有让人们阅读不同类型的小说。因此, 可能还有别的原因让言情小说的读者更加理解他人。
(12) 不过马尔还是说, 现在就告诉人们不读丹妮尔· 斯蒂尔的小说, 而去读爱丽丝· 门罗的小说还为时过早, 至少如果目标是增强人们的同情心的话是这样。
(13) 根据基德所说, 戏剧、 电影, 甚至电视节目都有可能培养人们的同情心, 但是阅读可能很特殊, 因为书不会提供任何视觉效果, 你必须更多地依靠自己的想象力。
(14) 对于文学作品的重要性不仅仅在于娱乐或提高词汇量这个研究结果, 每个人都同意。“人们普遍认为,阅读文学作品是无聊的, 或者不实用的, ” 马尔说道,“但越来越多的证据表明, 文学作品对我们日常生活中所需要的技能是非常重要的。”