单选题
{{B}}Passage One{{/B}}
Who to believe? Nokia or Ericsson? IBM or Sun Microsystems? Microsoft or Siebel? Rarely have the fortunes of technology companies appeared to differ so widely. Nokia, the world's largest maker of mobile phones, this week reported better-than-expected sales for the latest quarter, holding out the prospect that its market share would soon reach new highs. By contrast, Ericsson, a rival, was full of gloom.' Reporting bigger losses than expected, the company said that sales of its mobile phones were likely to tumble by 20%this year.
Motorola, another maker of mobile phones, is in a similar boat. On October 15th, the company reported a return to profit in its most recent period after a run of losses, but lowered its forecasts for the rest of the year and for 2003.Demand in wireless, broadband and semiconductors continued to slow, said the company. Unimpressed, investors marked down Motorola's shares to a ten-year low.
The pattern of haves and have-nots is repeated in software too. While Microsoft was in chipper mood this week—revelling in a 26%crease in sales and a doubling of its profits after tax for the quarter to the end of September—Siebel Systems and PeopleSoft, two of America's leading suppliers of business software, were down in the dumps. While PeopleSoft managed a modest profit, Siebel reported a loss for the last quarter and said it expected the present quarter to be equally tough. Despite (or because of) their contrasting fortunes, Microsoft and Siebel announced a joint marketing deal on October 21st: Microsoft is to sell Siebel's customer management software through. NET, its web-services product.
Why are some companies doing better than others? One reason is that, now more than ever, those that are competitive seem to be punishing those that are not. Nokia has stretched its lead over Ericsson which, in addition to lower sales of mobile phones, has suffered from the severe fall in demand for telecoms infrastructure, its biggest business. There was, however, some good news for Ericsson's shares on October 18th , when the company said that the infrastructure unit came close to breaking even in the most recent quarter.
Cost-cutting has also helped SAP, Europe's largest developer of business software, has reduced its expenses by 8%. As a result, its margins have improved a lot compared with those of its competitors. Microsoft has employed different tactics. It has capitalized on customers' fears that the cost of upgrading their software, such as the company's Windows XP operating system, could climb.Many have rushed to buy now in case prices rise. In tune with the times, Microsoft is also keen to demonstrate how its products can save its customers money. Understandably, this is winning its sales.
单选题 By saying "Motorola is in a similar boat", the author means
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】句子+上下文理解题。本文在第一段后半部分讲到爱立信公司处境困难,公司亏损,且移动电话销售额今年可能会降低20%。接着第二段说,摩托罗拉公司也是处于相同的船上,也就是说,摩托罗拉公司与爱守信公司境况相同。故选B。
单选题 The pattern of haves and have-nots in software industry refers to the fact that
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】细节题。haves and have-nots的本意是“富人和穷人”,在本文中指“盈利的富公司和亏损的穷公司”。第三段谈到了软件行业的贫富格局,也就是微软盈利而财富巨大,而西伯尔和人软则是亏损而财富拮据。故A是正确选项。其他三个选项均不符合原文。
单选题 One factor that contributes to some companies' greater profits is their______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】细节题。文章最后两段分析了公司业绩出现悬殊差距的原因。一是与公司的竞争力有关,二是与公司降低成本有关。在第二个原因中,较低的成本会有助于提高利润率。所以D是正确答案。A“产品较新”,B“股价较高”,C“产品价格较低”在文章中都没有提及,所以都不对。
单选题 The phrase "capitalize on" (Line 3, Par.5) most probably means______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】词汇题。最后一段讲到微软取得的业绩是采用了某种策略。从上下文可知,顾客担心软件升级会增加成本,因此许多人现在前来购买唯恐价格上涨。由此可知,微软是利用了顾客的这种担心的心理,热心地向顾客展示自己的产品如何帮助他们省钱,使销售额增加了。所以C的take advantage of(充分利用)符合这个意思。capitalize本身有“字母大写;资本化”等意思,在这里capitalize on是“利用”的意思。
单选题 What is the best title for the passage?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】主旨题。文章开头就提出全文的主题:科技公司的财富在以前似乎很少会产生这么大的差距。文章中给出多个例子说明现在科技公司有的在盈利,而有的在亏损,其财富产生悬殊差距,并以haves and have-nots(富人和穷人)来形容这两种公司。然后又分析了其中的部分原因。由此可见C“信息技术业内的一个新差距”符合这个意思,适合做文章标题。A是片面的,因为文章中不只是讲处于困境的公司,还涉及许多发达盈利的公司;B“世界IT市场”不是本文的中心内容,因为本文不是讲IT市场的情况,而是讲IT公司的状况;D“科技公司”这个标题太笼统,故也不合适。