单选题
Is the literary critic like the poet, responding creatively, intuitively, subjectively to the written word as the poet responds to human experience? Or is the critic more like a scientist, following a series of demonstrable, verifiable steps, using an objective method of analysis? For the woman who is a practitioner of feminist literary criticism, the subjectivity versus objectivity, or critic-as-artist-or-scientist, debate has special significance; for her, the question is not only academic, but political as well, and her definition will provoke special risks whichever side of the issue it favors. If she defines feminist criticism as objective and scientific--a valid, verifiable, intellectual method that anyone, whether man or woman, can perform--the definition not only makes the critic-as-artist approach impossible, but may also hinder accomplishment of the utilitarian political objectives of those who seek to change the academic establishment and its thinking, especially about sex roles. If she defines feminist criticism as creative and intuitive, privileged as art, then her work becomes vulnerable to the prejudices of stereotypic ideas about the ways in which women think, and will be dismissed by much of the academic establishment. Because of these prejudices, women who use an intuitive approach in their criticism may find themselves charged with inability to be analytical, to be objective, or to think critically. Whereas men may be free to claim the role of critic-as-artist, women run different professional risks when they choose intuition and private experience as critical method and defense. These questions are political in the sense that the debate over them will inevitably be less an exploration of abstract matters in a spirit of disinterested inquiry than an academic power struggle, in which the careers and professional fortunes of many women scholars only now entering the academic profession in substantial numbers will be at stake, and with them the chances for a distinctive contribution to humanistic understanding, a contribution that might be an important influence against sexism in our society. As long as the academic establishment continues to regard objective analysis as "masculine" and an intuitive approach as "feminine," the theoretician must steer a delicate philosophical course between the two. If she wishes to construct a theory of feminist criticism, she would be well advised to place it within the framework of a general theory of the critical process that is neither purely objective nor purely intuitive. Her theory is then more likely to be compared and contrasted with other theories of criticism with some degree of dispassionate distance. (418 words)
单选题
Which of the following titles best summarizes the content of the text?
单选题
The author specifically mentions all of the following as difficulties that particularly affect women who are theoreticians of feminist literary criticism EXCEPT the
【正确答案】
D
【答案解析】[注释] 细节辨认题。本题问:作者认为下面哪一点并不是影响妇女文学评论的困难?解这类题的关键是对所找信息进行段落定位。本题所涉及的作为女权文学评论家的妇女所遇到的困难主要在第2段中加以阐述。[A]“男子占统治地位的学术机构有形成对妇女先入为主的倾向”,可参阅第2段倒数第2句:“由于这些偏见,采用直觉方法进行评论的女子可能被认为缺乏分析能力、缺乏客观性或批判性思考的能力”。这些都是对妇女有先入为主的成见。[B]“把评论定义为客观的和科学的时所受到的限制”,参阅第2段第2、3句。[C]“主张艺术特殊性的女理论家的作品可能被某些学者带偏见地加以考虑”,参阅第2段第3句。[D]中写有... treat all forms of feminist theory with hostility,文中未提及。
单选题
It can be inferred that the author would define as "political" (Line 1, Para.3) the questions that