阅读理解 Passage 1    New Yorkers, albeit many of them grudgingly, are gradually getting used to more pedaling passengers on those blazing blue Citi Bikes. But what about local bike shops? Is Citi Bike rolling up riders at their expense? At Gotham Bikes in Tribeca, a manager who gave his name as “Ben W.”said the shop has seen an increase in its overall sales due to the bike-share program.   “It’s getting more people on the road, more people learning about the sport and getting involved,” he said.   An employee at Danny’s Cycles in Gramercy said Citi Bike is a good option for people to ease into biking in a city famed for its vehicular congestion and aggressive drivers.   “They can try out a bike without committing to buying one,” James Ryan said. “It makes a more comfortable biking environment in the city because there are a lot more bikes, too.”   Business at Danny’s Cycles has increased as well since the advent of bike-share.   “A lot of people come in for bike gear, and we’ve sold a lot of helmets,” he noted.   Rentals are not a big part of the business at either Gotham Bikesor Danny’s Cycles. But for Frank’s Bike Shop, a small business that has been at its current Lower East Side location on Grand St. since1976, the bike-share program has been bad news. Owner Frank Arroyo said that his rental business has decreased by 90 percent since the Citi Bikes were rolled out last month. Arroyo’s main rental customers are European tourists, a demographic that has since been drawn away by Citi Bikes. Initially, a bike-share station was sited a few doors away from Frank’s Bike Shop on the corner of Grand and Henry Sts. But a petition onmoveon.org to relocate the bike station gathered more than 1,000 signatures. The Citi Bike dock was eventually removed — but only temporarily, according to the Citi Bike Twitter account, for utility construction in the street.   “I was grateful, and it was quite an honor to see how many people responded on my behalf,” Arroyo said of the petition effort. “It was really nice to see that people care. But they have flooded the place with them,” he said of the Department of Transportation, which installs the bike racks.   Removing one station does little since the area is overloaded with Citi Bike stations, said Arroyo.   “If you put it in front of a hotel, customers are going to walk of the hotel and use it,” he said.   However, Ben said the bike-share is good for bike sales at his shop.   “People have used the bike-share and realized how great it is to bike in the city, then decide that they want something nicer for themselves,” he noted.   Christian Farrell of Waterfront Bicycle Shop, on West St. just north of Christopher St., said initially he was concerned about bike-share, though, he admitted, “I was happy to see people on bikes.”   Consisting of equal parts tourists and locals, his customers get a better rental deal at his shop because, despite charging only $10for a daily rental, the bike-share program requires cyclists tocheck their bikes in at a bike station every half hour. His store, on the other hand, charges $10 for the first hour, $5 for the second, and $2.50 per hour after that.   “Six hours with Waterfront Bicycle Shop will costa customer $25,” he said. “With Citi Bike, a six-hour rental will cost $126 [if the rider doesn’t re-dock his or her bike at a station every half hour]. Our rentals always include a helmet, a basket and a lock.”  Several dozen rental bikes were lined up on Weehawken St. last Sunday behind the store. Benny, who was watching over them, said another advantage over the Citi Bikes is that Waterfront’s bikes are all in good working order.   Farrell’s early concerns were echoed by Andrew Crooks, owner of NYCVelo, at 64 Second Ave.   “It seemed like a great idea, but one that would be difficult to implement,” Crooks said of Citi Bike. He said he worried about inexperienced riders’ lack of awareness of biking rules and backlash from non-cyclists. However, he said, it’s still too earlyto tell if his business has been impacted.   The actual Citi Bikes themselves have been criticized as “heavy,”“clunky,” even “ugly.” In comparison, Crooks said NYC Velo has bikes that are “lighter, faster and tend to be more comfortable.” Farrell of Waterfront also said his bikes are of “better quality” than the bike-share two-wheelers.   While it’s possible bike-share will cause a drop in business in the long run, Crooks allowed that the idea, as a whole, is good for the city.
单选题 What is the author's chief concern about the increasing use of Citi Bikes in New York?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】关于纽约的Citi Bikes项目的持续实施,作者主要关心的是什么?   文章第一段开头讲 参与Citi Bikes项目的骑行者越来越多,给纽约市民带来的影响,即他们感到越来越习惯。紧接着,作者就提出了问题:那么当地的自行车商店呢?后文也就这个问题进行了阐述。选项中B“当地自行车商店是否受影响”与文意相符,故入选。
单选题 What happened to Gotham Bikes as a result of the bike-share program?
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】这个自行车共享项目给Gotham Bikes 带来的影响是什么?   根据文章第一段第四句,Gotham Bikes的负责人Ben表示自行车共享项目给店铺带来了总体销售额的增加(an increase in its overall sales)。选项C“自行车销售量在增加”与文意相符,故入选。
单选题 Why is the bike-share program bad news for Frank's Bike Shop?
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】为什么对Frank's Bike Shop而言,自行车共享项目是一个坏消息?   文章第二段指出,但是对格兰街上的小企业Frank's Bike Shop而言,自行车分享项目是个坏消息。上个月推出的Citi Bikes项目使他们的租赁业务减少了90%。他们主要的租赁客户是来自欧洲的旅游者。Citi Bikes项目导致了这些客户的流失。选项B与文意相符,故入选。
单选题 Why did Andrew Crooks think that the bike-share program would be difficult to execute?
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】为什么Andrew Crooks认为自行车共享项目很难实施?   文章第四段第二句指出,Crooks 说“这看上去是个好主意,但可能会难以实施。”他担心缺乏经验的骑行者们不了解自行车交通规则,也担心来自于非骑行者们的强烈反对。选项A“缺乏经验的骑行者们可能会违反自行车交通规则”,与文章内容相符,故入选。
单选题 What is the general attitude of the local bike shops towards Citi Bike?
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】当地自行车商铺对于Citi Bike项目的大致态度是什么样的?   文章最后一段指出,对纽约市而言,这个项目迈出了积极的一步。选项D,意为赞成的,故入选。