单选题 It was two years ago today that the hunting ban came into force, supposedly ending centuries of tradition. However, the law has been an unmitigated failure-not that either side is shouting about it.
It was a nightmare vision that struck fear and loathing into the hearts of millions. When the hunting ban became law, it was said, 16, 000 people would lose their jobs, thousands of hounds would be put down, rotting carcasses would litter the countryside, hedgerows would disappear, riders would face on-the-spot fines, law-abiding people from doctors to barristers would be dragged from their horses and carted off to prison, while dog owners would be prosecuted if their mutt caught a rabbit.
These were just some of the claims as desperate countryside campaigners battled to save their sport in the lead-up to the hunting ban, which Labour rammed into law using the Parliament Act on November 18, 2004.
For many, the fears were real. Others exaggerated as they fought an increasingly aggressive anti-hunting lobby which had rejected acres of independent evidence affirming that hunting is the most humane way of killing foxes. In the battle to"fight prejudice, fight the ban", every emotive argument was deployed.
For its part, the anti-hunting brigade extravagantly claimed that the ban would put an end to the rich parading in red jackets. A senior Labour MP, Peter Bradley, admitted in this newspaper that it was, as many suspected, about "class war". He lost his seat shortly afterwards. But people in red coats did not disappear.
In fact, none of the forecasts came true. What did happen was something nobody had predicted: the spectacular revival and growth of hunting with hounds. In short, the hunting ban has been a failure.
Today, on the second anniversary of the ban's coming into force on February 18, 2005, new figures show that participation in the sport has never been higher. It is so cheerful that two new packs have been formed, something that has not happened for centuries.
They include the seductively named Private Pack, set up by the financier Roddy Fleming in Gloucestershire. It operates on an invitation-only basis, a sort of hunting private members' club. This can only mean one thing: like it or not, hunting is cool. Young people are taking it up, enticed by the element of rebellion and the mystique of what actually happens as hunts attempt to keep within the law.

单选题 The phase "came into force" underlined in Paragraph 1 is closest in meaning to ______.

单选题 The hunting ban has been a complete failure because ______.

【正确答案】 A

【答案解析】[解析] 根据文中第六段的内容“the spectacular revival and growth of hunting with hounds．In short，the hunting ban has been a failure．”可知，狩猎禁令彻底失败了，壮观的猎狗狩猎又复苏了，所以应该选择A。B项“政府缺少人手去执行该法律”，C项“法律制定者没有看到狩猎是个长期的传统”，D项“禁令的目的只是保护上流社会的利益”，这三项都不符合题意。

单选题 The word "loathing" underlined in Paragraph 2 is closest in meaning to ______.

单选题 Those who break the hunting ban would ______.

【正确答案】 D

【答案解析】[解析] 根据第二段的内容“riders would face on-the-spot fines，law-abiding people from doctors to barristers would be dragged from their horses and carted off to prison，while dog owners would be prosecuted if their mutt caught a rabbit．”可知D项“面临罚款或监禁”符合题意。A项“失去工作”，B项“给朋友带来耻辱”，C项“不得不杀掉他们的马和狗”，这三项明显和第二段内容不符合。

单选题 The word "prosecuted" underlined in Paragraph 4 is closest in meaning to ______.

单选题 The anti-hunting lobby held that ______.

【正确答案】 C

【答案解析】[解析] 根据第四段的内容“Others exaggerated as they fought an increasingly aggressive anti-hunting lobby which had rejected acres of independent evidence affirming that hunting is the most humane way of killing foxes．”可知，狩猎者认为狩猎杀死狐狸是最人道的方式，而反对狩猎者不这么认为，所以C项“人类猎杀不合理”符合题意。A项“猎杀狐狸是偏见的表示”，B项“乡下的活动家是合理的”，D项“狩猎者夸大了狩猎的可怕景象”，这三项明显和文中第四段内容不符合。

单选题 What does the author think of the hunting campaigners' position?

【正确答案】 B

【答案解析】[解析] 根据第四段的内容“In the battle to fight prejudice，fight the ban，every emotive argument was deployed．”可知，抗议者们在“反歧视，反禁令”的斗争中，运用了一切可以动感情的手段，所以B项“充满感情的”符合题意。A项“没被察觉到的偏见”，C项“越来越好战”，D项“当然是很强大的”，这三项明显和文中第四段的内容不符合。

单选题 The word "rebellion" underlined in the last Paragraph refers to ______.

单选题 By saying "people in red coats did not disappear," the author implied that ______.

【正确答案】 C

【答案解析】[解析] 根据第五段的内容“For its part，the anti-hunting brigade extravagantly claimed that the ban would put an end to the rich parading in red jackets．”和“But people in red coats did not disappear”可知，人们继续游行，C项“狩猎禁令没有起作用”符合题意。A项“上流阶层赢得了战争”，B项“布雷得里得到了应得的命运”，D项“禁令不合时宜”，这三项明显和文中第五段的内容不符合。

单选题 As a result of the ban, ______.

【正确答案】 B

【答案解析】[解析] 根据文中最后一段的内容“Young people are taking it up，enticed by the element of rebellion and the mystique of what actually happens as hunts attempt to keep within the law．”可知B项“人们对狩猎变得更好奇了”符合题意。A项“狩猎活动变得越来越偷偷摸摸了”，文中说禁令实施失败，人们狩猎活动应该更趋向于合法化，不应该变得偷偷摸摸；C项“市民被法律搞得更迷惑了”，文中没有提到相关内容；D项“国家的传统被彻底地动摇了”，禁令是动摇了国家传统，但是禁令失败，国家传统活动狩猎并没有动摇，所以这三项明显和文中内容不符合。