单选题     A. abolish
    B. accelerate
    C. ambiguity
    D. bring
    E. dispense
    F. evidence
    G. expenditure
    H. inquiry
    I. irrational
    J. lead
    K. outpace
    L. shift
    M. simply
    N. striking
    O. unanimously
    For the past four decades that basic tension between artificial intelligence and intelligence augmentation (增加)—A.I. versus I.A. —has been at the heart of progress in computing science as the field has produced a series of ever more powerful technologies.
    Now, as the pace of technological change continues to     42    , it has become increasingly possible to design computing systems that enhance the human experience, or now—in a growing number of cases—completely     43    with it.
    Watson is an effort by IBM researchers to advance a set of techniques used to process human language. It provides     44    evidence that computing systems will no longer be limited to responding to simple commands. Machines will increasingly be able to pick out jargon (行话) and even riddles. In attacking the problem of the     45    of human language, computer science is now closing in on what researchers refer to as the 'Paris Hilton problem' —the ability, for example, to determine whether an     46    is being made by someone who is trying to reserve a hotel in France, or     47    to pass time surfing the Internet.
    Traditionally, economists have argued that while new forms of automation may displace jobs in the short run, over longer periods of time economic growth and job creation have continued to     48    any job-killing technology. Over the past century and a half the     49    from being a largely agrarian (农业的) society to one in which less than 1 percent of the United States labor force is in agriculture is frequently cited as     50    of the economy's ability to reinvent itself.
    Rapid progress in natural language processing is beginning to     51    to a new wave of automation that promises to transform areas of the economy that have until now been untouched by technological change.
问答题    
 
【正确答案】B
【答案解析】空格前为continues to,空格后为逗号,故空格处应填入动词原形,且该动词能以the pace为逻辑主语。 由首段可知,人工智能这一领域已经生产出了一系列极有影响力的科技产品;本空格后面部分提到,现在人类越来越有可能设计出计算机系统。结合上述内容和备选动词可知,accelerate“加速,加快”符合题意。
问答题    
 
【正确答案】E
【答案解析】分析句子结构可知,句末的代词it指代前面的the human experience,句中的or提示空格所填词应与前面的动词enhance并列,所以空格处应填入动词,且能与空格后的介词with相搭配。 本句指出,计算机系统增强人类体验,或现在则完全______人类体验。结合备选动词可知,答案为dispense (with)“不用,摒弃”。
问答题    
 
【正确答案】N
【答案解析】空格前为动词provides,空格后为名词evidence,因此空格处应填入形容词。 上一句提到,IBM的研究人员推出一套用来处理人类语言的技术;本句及下一句提到,计算机系统将不再限于对简单指令作出回应,而将能识别行话甚至谜语。结合上述内容及备选形容词可以推断,striking“惊人的,显著的”符合题意。
问答题    
 
【正确答案】C
【答案解析】空格前为定冠词the,空格后为介词短语of human language,因此空格处应填入名词。 空格后面部分提到Paris Hilton problem的例子,指出Paris Hilton既可指法国巴黎的希尔顿酒店,也可指美国社交名媛帕丽斯·希尔顿,这个例子说明了语言的模糊性,故本题选ambiguity“模棱两可,不明确”。
问答题    
 
【正确答案】H
【答案解析】空格前为不定冠词an,空格后为be动词is,因此空格处应填入名词。 根据后面的reserve a hotel可推断,空格处应填入inquiry“询问”,与后面的made搭配,表示“进行查询”。
问答题    
 
【正确答案】M
【答案解析】or前后连接了两个并列的不定式结构,故空格处应填入副词作状语。 根据句意,某人在电脑中查询Paris Hilton,既可能是想预订法国巴黎的希尔顿酒店,也可能是想上网看看美国社交名媛来打发时间。因此,备选副词中,simply“仅仅,只是”符合题意。
问答题    
 
【正确答案】K
【答案解析】空格前为不定式符号to,空格后为名词短语any job-killing technology,因此空格处应填入动词原形。 结合句中while表示的转折之意、in the short run和over longer periods of time的对比以及备选动词可知,outpace“超过,比……快”符合题意。
问答题    
 
【正确答案】L
【答案解析】本句结构较复杂,介词短语Over the past century and a half为句子的时间状语,the ______ from...to...in agriculture为句子的主语,主语部分缺少中心词,故空格处应填入名词。 结合空格后面的内容“美国从基本是农耕社会到农业劳动人口占总劳动人口不足1%的社会”及备选名词可知,shift“改变,转变”符合题意,the shift from...to...意为“从……到……的转变”。
问答题    
 
【正确答案】F
【答案解析】空格前为is frequently cited as,空格后为介词of,故空格处应填入名词。 本句指出,美国从基本是农耕社会到农业劳动人口占总劳动人口不足1%的社会的这种转变常被引用为经济有自我改良功能的______。结合空格前的cited as可知,备选名词中,evidence“证据,证明”符合题意。
问答题    
 
【正确答案】J
【答案解析】空格前为不定式符号to,空格后为介词to,因此空格处应填入动词原形。 根据Rapid progress in natural language processing与a new wave of automation之间的关系可知,备选动词中,lead“导致”符合题意。