单选题
Lacking a cure for AIDS, society must offer
education, not only by public pronouncement but in classrooms. Those with AIDS
or those at high risk of AIDS suffer prejudice; they are feared by some people
who find living itself unsafe, while others conduct themselves with a "bravado"
that could be fatal. AIDS has {{U}}afflicted{{/U}} a society already short on
humanism, open-handedness and optimism. Attempts to strike it out with the
offending microbe are not abetted by pre-existing social ills. Such concerns
impelled me to offer the first university level undergraduate AIDS course, with
its two important aims. To address the fact the AIDS is caused
by a virus, not by moral failure of societal collapse. The proper response to
AIDS is compassion coupled with an understanding of the disease itself. We
wanted to foster (help the growth of) the idea of a humane society.
To describe how {{U}}AIDS tests institutions upon which our society
rests{{/U}}. The economy, the political sys- tem, science, the legal
establishment, the media and our moral ethical-philosophical attitudes must
respond to the disease. Those responses, whispered, or shrieked, easily accepted
or highly controversial, must be put in order if the nation is to manage AIDS.
Scholars have suggested that how a society deals with the threat of AIDS
describes the extent to which that society has the right to call itself
civilized. AIDS, then, is woven into the tapestry of modem society; in the
course of explaining that tapestry, a teacher realizes that AIDS may bring about
changes of historic proportions. Democracy obliges its educational system to
prepare students to become informed citizens, to join their voices to the public
debate inspired by AIDS. Who shall direct just what resources of manpower and
money to the problem of AIDS? Even more basic, who shall formulate a national
policy on AIDS? The educational challenge, then, is to enlighten the individual
and the societal, or public responses to AIDS.