If sustainable competitive advantage depends on work-force skills, American firms have a problem. Human-resource management is not traditionally seen as central to the competitive survival of the firm in the United States. Skill acquisition is considered an individual responsibility. Labor is simply another factor of production to be hired-rented at the lowest possible cost-much as one buys raw materials or equipment. The lack of importance attached to human-resource management can be seen in the corporate hierarchy. In an American firm the chief financial officer is almost always second in command. The post of head of human-resource management is usually a specialized job, off at the edge of the corporate hierarchy. The executive who holds it is never consulted on major strategic decisions and has no chance to move up to Chief Executive Officer(CEO). By way of contrast, in Japan the head of human-resource management is central-usually the second most important executive, after the CEO, in the firm's hierarchy. While American firms often talk about the vast amounts spent on training their work forces, in fact they invest less in the skills of their employees than do either Japanese or German firms. The money they do invest is also more highly concentrated on professional and managerial employees. And the limited investments that are made in training workers are also much more narrowly focused on the specific skills necessary to do the next job rather than on the basic background skills that make it possible to absorb new technologies. As a result, problems emerge when new breakthrough technologies arrive. If American workers, for example, take much longer to learn how to operate new flexible manufacturing stations than workers in Germany (as they do), the effective cost of those stations is lower in Germany than it is in the United States. More time is required before equipment is up and running at capacity, and the need for extensive retraining generates costs and creates bottlenecks that limit the speed with which new equipment can be employed. The result is a slower pace of technological change. And in the end the skills of the population affect the wages of the top haft. If the bottom half can't effectively staff the processes that have to be operated, the management and professional jobs that go with these processes will disappear.
单选题
Which of the following applies to the management of human-resources in American companies? A. They hire people at the lowest cost regardless of their skills. B. They see the gaining of skills as their employees' own business. C. They attach more importance to workers than equipment. D. They only hire skilled workers because of keen competition.
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】细节判断题。本题问美国公司人力资源管理的情况。根据题干,问题指向第一段第二、三两句话:在美国公司看来,人力资源管理对公司在市场竞争中能否生存并不是非常重要的,学习技术被看成是工人个人的事情,因此选项[B]是正确答案。[B]中gaining of skills对应原文skill acquisition,their employees' own business对应individual responsibility。本段最后一句话说美国公司认为应该以尽可能低的价格雇佣工人,但并没有说可以不考虑工人的技术水平,所以A项错;最后一句话也提到美国公司就像购买原料和设备一样雇佣员工,可见其并不重视工人,所以[C]错;[D]文章没有提到。
单选题
What is the position of the head of human-resource management in an American firm? A. He is one of the most important executives in the firms. B. His post is likely to disappear when new technologies are introduced C. He is directly under the chief financial executive. D. He has no say in making important decisions in the firm.
单选题
The money most American firms put in training mainly goes to______. A. workers who can operate new equipment B. technological and managerial staff C. workers who lack basic background skills D. top executives
单选题
According to the passage, the decisive factor in maintaining a firm's competitive advantage is ______. A. the introduction of new technologies B. the improvement of worker's basic skills C. the rational composition of professional and managerial employees D. the attachment of importance to the bottom half of the employees
单选题
What is the main idea of the passage? A. American firms are different from Japanese and German firms in human-resource management. B. Extensive retraining is indispensable to effective human-resource management. C. The head to human-resource management must be in the central position in a firm's hierarchy. D. The human-resource management strategies of American firms affect their competitive capacity.