单选题
Oil and Economy

Could the bad old days of economic decline be about to return? Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March, the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel, up from less than $10 last December. This near-tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock, when prices quadrupled, and 1979-1980,when they also almost tripled. Both previous shocks resulted in double-digit inflation and global economic decline. So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time?
The oil price was given another push up this week when Iraq suspended oil exports. Strengthening economic growth, at the same time as winter grips the northern hemisphere, could push the price higher still in the short term.
Yet there are good reasons to expect the economic consequences now to be less severe than in the 1970s. In most countries the cost of crude oil now accounts for a smaller share of the price of petrol than it did in the 1970s. In Europe, taxes account for up to four-fifths of the retail price, so even quite big changes in the price of crude oil have a more muted effect on pump prices than in the past.
Rich economies are also less dependent on oil than they were, and so less sensitive to swings in the oil price. Energy conservation, a shift to other fuels and a decline in the importance of heavy, energy-intensive industries have reduced oil consumption. Software, consultancy and mobile telephones use far less oil than steel or car production. For each dollar of GDP (inconstant prices) rich economies now use nearly 50% less oil than in 1973. The OECD estimates in its latest Economic Outlook that, if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year, compared with $13 in 1998, this would increase the oil import bill in rich economies by only 0.25%-0.5% of GDP. That is less than one-quarter of the income loss in 1974 or 1980. On the other hand, oil-importing emerging economies-to which heavy industry has shifted--have become more energy-intensive, and so could be more seriously squeezed.
One more reason not to lose sleep over the rise in oil prices is that, unlike the rises in the 1970s, it has not occurred against the background of general commodity-price inflation and global excess demand. A sizable portion of the world is only just emerging from economic decline. The Economist" s commodity price index is broadly unchanging from a year ago. In 1973 commodity prices jumped by 70%, and in 1979 by almost 30%.
单选题 The main reason for the rise of oil price since March is ______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 由文章第一段的第二句话“Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March,the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel,up from less than $10 last December.”可知,石油输出国决定降低供给量使得油价上升。故选B。
单选题 It can be inferred from the text that the retail price of petrol will go up dramatically in Europe if ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 由文章第三段第三句话可知,在欧洲,税占汽油零售价的五分之四,因此相比以往,原油的价格变化对汽油的影响不会很明显。由此可知,税的增加会导致汽油价格的猛涨,而原油价格的变化带来的影响不会很大。故选D。
单选题 The estimates in Economic Outlook show that in rich countries ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 由文章第四段第五句话“the OECD estimates in its latest Economic outlook that,if oil prices averaged $22 a barrel for a full year,compared with $13 in 1998,this would increase the oir import bill in rich economies by only 0.25%~0.5% of GDP.”可知,油价的上涨对GDP的影响 很小,只有0.25%~0.5%。故选D。
单选题 We can draw a conclusion from the text that ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 文章第三段指出“油价的经济影响不会那么严重”,作者指出其原因是“原油价格占汽油价格的比例不高,发达国家对石油的依赖减弱,此次涨价的背景不一样了”。文章最后一段则讲到“这次油价上涨与20世纪70年代的上涨不同,对各国的影响也基本没有反映出来,连物价都基本没有变动”,也就是说,油价冲击已经不是那么可怕。故选A。
单选题 From the text we can see that the writer seems ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本文作者主要讲的就是这次油价上涨的影响不大。尤其是第三段和最后一段的第一句话,强调人们不必担心此次油价上涨,因为这一次的情况与20世纪70年代的不同。由此可见,作者的态度是乐观的。故选A。