单选题 When we worry about who might be spying on our private lives, we usually think about the Federal agents. But the private sector outdoes the government every time. It"s Linda Tripp, not the FBI, who is facing charges under Maryland"s laws against secret telephone taping. It"s our banks, not the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), that pass our private financial data to telemarketing firms.
Consumer activists are pressing Congress for better privacy laws without much result so far. The legislators lean toward letting business people track our financial habits virtually at will. As an example of what"s going on, consider U. S. Bancorp, which was recently sued for deceptive practices by the state of Minnesota. According to the lawsuit, the bank supplied a telemarketer called Member- Works with sensitive customer data such as names, phone numbers, bank-accounts and credit-card numbers, Social Security numbers, account balances and credit limits.
With these customer lists in hand, MemberWorks started dialing for dollars—selling dental plans, videogames, computer software and other products and services. Customers who accepted a "free trial offer" had 50 days to cancel. If the deadline passed, they were Charged automatically through their bank or credit-card accounts. U.S. Bancorp collected a share of the revenues. Customers were doubly deceived, the lawsuit claims. They didn"t know that the bank was giving account numbers to MemberWorks. And if customers asked, they were led to think the answer was no.
The state sued McmberWorks separately for deceptive selling. The company defends that it did anything wrong. For its part, U.S. Baneorp settled without admitting any mistakes. But it agreed to stop exposing its customers to nonfinancial products sold by outside firms. A few top banks decided to de the same. Many other banks will still do business with MemberWorks and similar firms.
And banks will still be mining data from your account in order to sell you financial products, including things of little value, such as credit insurance and credit-card protection plans. You have almost no protection from businesses that use your personal accounts for profit. For example, no federal law shields "transaction and experience" information—mainly the details of your bank and credit-card accounts. Social Security numbers are for sale by private firms. They"ve generally agreed not to sell to the public. But to businesses, the numbers are an open book. Self-regulation doesn"t work. A firm might publish a privacy-protection policy, but who enforces it?
Take U.S. Bancorp again. Customers were told, in writing, that "all personal information you supply to us will be considered confidential." Then it sold your data to MemberWorks. The bank even claims that it doesn"t "sell" your data at all: It merely "shares" it and reaps a profit. Now you know.
单选题 Contrary to popular belief, the author finds that spying on people"s privacy ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 本题是一道细节题,也是一道主旨题。文章的主题是在讲一些私人公司、银行在探索你的个人信息和隐私,这在美国非常的盛行。
A.通过秘密开发的方式来施行的。在原文中压根就找不到依据。
B.在IRS 的帮助下已经得到强制化了。
C.仅仅被FBI 所实施。
D.在商业圈中很流行。与原文的意思一致。
单选题 We know from the passage that ______.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 本题是一道细节题。参看文章第二段的第二句“The legislators lean to- ward letting business people track our financial habits virtually at will”即:立法者倾向于许可私人公司追踪客户的消费习惯。
A.为了保护消费者的私人信息,立法者制定了一部法律。原文没有提到这一事实。
B.大多数的州对私人公司的窥探行动毫无察觉。
C.Minnesota 州正在考虑制定一部法律来保护私人的信息。
D.立法者倾向于许可私人公司追踪客户的消费习惯。与原文的意思一致。
单选题 When the "free trial" deadline is over, you"ll be charged without notice for a product or service if______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 本题是一道细节题。参看文章第三段的第三句“If the deadline passed, they were charged automatically through their bank or credit-card accounts.U.S.Bancorp collected a share of the revenues”即:如果你没有在免费使用期里退掉购买的服务,那么期限已过,你就得付费。
A.在特殊时期里,你不能取消它。与原文的意思一致。
B.你泄露了你的信用卡密码。
C.你发现产品和服务都不能使你满意。在原文找不到任何的依据。
D.你不能够申请延期服务。
单选题 Businesses do not regard information concerning personal bank accounts as private because______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 本题是一道细节题。参看第五段第三句“You have almost no protection from businesses that use your personal accounts for profit.For example,no federal law shields‘transaction and experience’information—mainly the details of your bank and credit-card accounts”由此可知,因为没有法律明文规定来保护你的交易信息,所以私人银行可以从中牟利。
A.因为有通用的保护方针,所以它的泄露不会对消费者造成严重的措施。
B.没有法律明文规定来保护你的交易信息,所以私人银行可以从中牟利
C.一般公众认为这是一个公开的秘密。
D.通过自我控制,它的销售能够实现。
单选题 We can infer from the passage that______.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[解析] 本题是一道推断题。参看文章的句末“Then it sold your data to Member- Works.The bank even claims that it doesn"t“sell”your data at all.It merely“shares”it and reaps a profit.Now you know.”说明这种侵犯消费者的隐私权,从中牟利的现象暂时还不可能被根除。
A.银行不得不改变他们的商业操作方法。在原文中找不到任何的依据。
B.保护私人信息的法律将很快实行。
C.消费者的隐私权仍继续被侵犯。
D.“free trial”将被禁止。