阅读理解
Passage Two
Questions 57 to 62 are based on the following passage.
"Usually when we walk through the rain forest we hear a soft sound from all the moist leaves and organic debris on the forest floor," says ecologist Daniel Nepstad. "Now we increasingly get rustle and crunch. That's the sound of a dying forest."
Predictions of the collapse of the tropical rain forests have been around for years. Yet until recently the worst forecasts were almost exclusively linked to direct human activity, such as clear-cutting and burning for pastures or farms. Left alone, it was assumed, the world's rain forests would not only flourish but might even rescue us from disaster by absorbing the excess carbon dioxide and other planet-warming greenhouse gases. Now it turns out that may be wishful thinking. Some scientists believe that the rise in carbon levels means that the Amazon and other rain forests in Asia and Africa may go from being assets in the battle against rising temperatures to liabilities. Amazon plants, for instance, hold more than 100 billion metric tons of carbon, equal to 15 years of tailpipe and chimney emissions. If the collapse of the rain forests speeds up dramatically, it could eventually release 3.5-5 billion metric tons of carbon into the atmosphere each year - making forests the leading source of greenhouse gases.
Uncommonly severe droughts brought on by global climate changes have led to forest-eating wildfires from Australia to Indonesia, but nowhere more acutely than in the
Amazon. Some experts say that the rain forest is already at the brink of collapse.
Extreme weather and reckless development arc plotting against the rain forest in ways that scientists have never seen. Trees need more water as temperatures rise, but the prolonged droughts have robbed them of moisture, making whole forests easily cleared of trees and turned into farmland. The picture worsens with each round of El Nino, the unusually warm currents in the Pacific Ocean that drive up temperatures and invariably presage (预示) droughts and fires in the rain forest. Runaway fires pour even more carbon into the air, which increases temperatures, starting the whole vicious cycle all over again.
More than paradise lost, a perishing rain forest could trigger a domino effect - sending winds and rains kilometers off course and loading the skies with even greater
levels of greenhouse gases - that will be felt far beyond the Amazon basin. In a sense, we are already getting a glimpse of what's to come. Each burning season in the Amazon, fires deliberately set by frontier settlers and developers hurl up almost half a billion metric tons of carbon a year, placing Brazil among the top five contributors to greenhouse gases in the world.
单选题
We learn from the first paragraph that _______.
【正确答案】
D
【答案解析】[解析] 文章第1段引用的是生物学家Daniel Nepstad的话。他说道,通常森林地面上潮湿的叶子和有机残体会发出轻柔的声音,而现在发出的却是沙沙声和嘎吱声,这是森林垂死的声音。由此可知,森林的声音表明了它的健康状态,故选D项。
第1段没有区分声音的类别,A项“枯叶和树叶残体发出相同的声音”无依据。a soft moan是森林平常时发出的声响,dying时发出的声音是rustle and crunch,排除B项。第1段没有谈到echo the sounds“声音回响”的情况,排除C项“有机残体回响着雨林的声音”。
单选题
In the second paragraph, the author challenges the view that _______.
单选题
The author argues that the rising carbon levels in rain forests may ______.
【正确答案】
A
【答案解析】[解析] 题目询问作者对碳浓度增加的看法。第5句的from to结构表明,碳浓度的上升意味着许多雨林在对抗气温升高的战役中从(from)宝贵资源(being assets)变成了(to)不利因素(liabilities)。该段最后一句更是谈到,如果雨林消亡速度剧增,森林会成为温室气体的主要来源(the leading source of greenhouse gases)。A项与之表述一致,为答案。
文章没有提及weather patterns和wildlife的情况,首先排除B项“改变全球的气候模式”和C项“对野生生物构成威胁”。雨林的作用之一是吸收二氧化碳,碳含量的增加并不会加速雨林的消亡,排除D项。
单选题
What has made it easier to turn some rain forests into farmland?
【正确答案】
C
【答案解析】[解析] 题目询问促使雨林更容易变为农田的原因。C项的lack of rainfall对应原文提到的droughts“干旱”一词,该句提到,气温升高时,树木需要更多的水分,但长期的干旱使水分殆尽,这便使得森林的树木更容易被清除而转为农田。因此C项是原因。
A项“碳含量的快速上升”和B项“不计后果的土地开发”只是出题人胡乱设置的选项,文章并未谈及且与题目不存在因果关系。D项“太平洋异常暖流”即厄尔尼诺现象会使情况变得恶化,但不是使雨林变农田的根本原因。
单选题
What makes Brazil one of the world's top five contributors to greenhouse gases?
【正确答案】
B
【答案解析】[解析] 题目询问让巴西成为排放温室气体的五大国之一的原因,B项的burning forests及settlement and development分别对应最后一句的fires和settlers and developers,可见为了居住和开发,烧毁森林的行为正是巴西成为排放温室气体五大国之一的原因,选B项。
A项“消亡的雨林引起的多米诺骨牌效应”和C项“亚马逊地区的风雨模式的改变”讲的都是多米诺骨牌效应,它针对的是整个亚马逊河流域而并非巴西一个国家,而且这也不是让巴西变成排放温室气体五大国之一的主要原因。该段没有提到工业(industries)的情况,排除D项“无法控制工业产生的碳排放”。