单选题 There is a fashionable new science, behavioral economics, which applies the insights of psychology to how people make economic decisions. It tries to explain, for instance, the herd instinct that led people during the recent bubble to override common sense and believe things about asset values because others did. the " bandwagon effect." Behavioral economics has also brought us notions like "loss aversion", how we hate giving up a dollar we have far more than forgoing a dollar we have not yet got.
But while there is a lot of interest in the psychology and neuroscience of markets, there is much less in the psychology and neuroscience of government. Slavisa Tasic, of the University of Kiev, wrote a paper recently for the Istituto Bruno Leoni in Italy about this omission. He argues that market participants are not the only ones who make mistakes, yet he notes drily that "in the mainstream economic literature there is a near complete absence of concern that regulatory design might suffer from lack of competence." Public servants are human, too.
Mr. Tasic identifies five mistakes that government regulators often make: action bias, motivated reasoning, the focusing illusion, the affect heuristic and illusions of competence. In the last case, psychologists have shown that we systematically overestimate how much we understand about the causes and mechanisms of things we half understand. The Swedish health economist Hans Rosling once gave students a list of five pairs of countries and asked which nation in each pair had the higher infant-mortality rate. The students got 1.8 right out of 5. Mr. Rosling noted that if he gave the test to chimpanzees they would get 2.5 right. So his students" problem was not ignorance, but that they knew with confidence things that were false.
The issue of action bias is better known in England as the "dangerous dogs act," after a previous government, confronted with a couple of cases in which dogs injured or killed people, felt the need to bring in a major piece of clumsy and bureaucratic legislation that worked poorly. Undoubtedly the hasty legislation following the current financial crisis will include some equivalents of dangerous dogs acts. It takes unusual courage for a regulator to stand up and say "something must not be done," lest "something" makes the problem worse.
Motivated reasoning means that we tend to believe what it is convenient for us to believe. The focusing illusion partly stems from the fact that people tend to see the benefits of a policy but not the hidden costs. "Affect heuristic" is a fancy name for a pretty obvious concept, namely that we discount the drawbacks of things we are emotionally in favor of. If lawmakers are to understand how laws get applied in the real world, they need to know and understand the habits of mind of their officials.
单选题 The "bandwagon effect" is one in which people ______
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 英语中经常使用Jump/climb on the bandwagon这个同组,其意思是“跟风,赶时髦”。在第一段中,bandwagon effect和herd instinct都指“从众心理”。在第二句中,that lead...others did这个定语从句就解释了herd instinct的意思。
单选题 What Mr. Tasic says amounts to arguing that ______
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[解析] 第二段提到Tasic的观点,主要是为了说明本段第一句所提到的现象,特别是本句后半句提到的现象,即行为经济学不太研究政府心理学和政府神经科学。Tasic的基本观点是:研究市场心理学和市场神经科学是必要的,但是研究政府官员的行为也是非常重要的,因为他们能力的缺乏也可能会导致监管过程的错误。在下文,作者提到了政府官员常见的五种心理错误。
单选题 The most important finding from Rosling"s experiment is that ______
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 第三段中作者提到。Rosling的实验,为了说明官员身上存在的illusions of competence。第二句对这种现象进行了解释,它主要指的是官员高估自己的理解力。本段最后一句也对这个实验进行了总结:学生的问题不是无知,而是他们满怀信心地知道一些错误的东西,即对于自己的知识和理解力过于自信。
单选题 The inclination to act without adequate information and analysis is a case of ______
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[解析] 第四段对action bias进行了举例说明,提到了英国的dangerous dogs act和legislation following the current financial crisis。从这两个例子来推断,这里都是批评了英国在制定法律时欠考虑,很草率(rash),结果都没有达到预期效果。作者总结说,有时候官员们需要有勇气阻止某个行为,因为它可能使形势变得更糟。最后一段对motivated reasoning和affect heuristic也进行了说明。第三段则对illusions of competence进行了详细的说明。
单选题 The text is mainly about ______
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[解析] 本文第一段总体介绍了行为经济学的研究对象。第二段第一句引出本文要谈到的话题(特别是本句后半句):行为心理学要研究政府的行为。第三段更具体地提到了这些行为包括的主要方面,即政府官员常犯的五种错误或偏见,然后描述了这五种错误的性质和表现。全文最后一句总结说,如果立法者想理解法律的实施方式,他们需要知道the habits of mind of their officials,这里再次强调了研究政府官员心理习惯的重要性。实际上,所谓“五种错误”,也都是属于心理习惯方面的问题。
本文第一段只是在概括地介绍行为经济学研究的内容,尚没有切入本文的主题,因此其他三个选项都不正确。