单选题 When Dr. John W.Gofman, professor of medical physics at the University of California and a leading nuclear critic, speaks of "ecocide" in his adversary view of nuclear technology, he means the following: A large nuclear plant like that in Kalkar, the Netherlands, would produce about 200 pounds of plutonium each year. One pound, released into the atmosphere, could cause 9 billion cases of lung cancer. This waste product must be stored for 500,000 years before it is of no further danger to man. In the anticipated reactor economy, it is estimated that there will be 10,000 tons of this material in Western Europe, of which one table-spoonful of plutonium-239 represents the official maximum permissible body burden for 200,000 people. Rather than being biodegradable, plutonium destroys biological properties.
In 1972 the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration ruled that the asbestos level in the work place should be lowered to 2 fibers per cubic centimeter of air, but the effective date of the ruling has been delayed until now. The International Federation of Chemical and General Workers' Unions report that the 2-fiber standard was based primarily on one study of 290 men at a British asbestos factory. But when the workers at the British factory had been reexamined by another physician, 40--70 percent had X-ray evidence of lung abnormalities. According to present medical information at the factory in question, out of a total of 29 deaths thus far, seven were caused by lung cancer. An average European or American worker comes into contact with six million fibers a day. "We are now, in fact, finding cancer deaths within the family of the asbestos worker," states Dr. Irving Selikoff, of the Mount Sinai Medical School in New York.
It is now also clear that vinyl chloride, a gas from which the most widely used plastics are made, causes a fatal cancer of the blood-vessel cells of the liver. However, the history of the research on vinyl chloride is, in some ways, more disturbing than the "Watergate cover-up." "There has been evidence of potentially serious disease among polyvinyl chloride workers for 25 years that has been incompletely appreciated and inadequately approached by medical scientists and by regulatory authorities," summed up Dr. Selikoff in the New Scientist. At least 17 workers have been killed by vinyl chloride because research over the past 25 years was not followed up. And for over 10 years, workers have been exposed to concentrations of vinyl chloride 10 times the "safe limit" imposed by Dow Chemical Company. (422 words)

Notes: plutonium 钚。asbestos 石棉。polyvinyl chloride 聚氯乙烯。

单选题 By "ecocide" the author most probably means
[A] waste utilization.
[B] ecological balance.
[C] radioactive reaction.
[D] massive bio-destruction.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】[注释] 词汇释义题。本题问:“ecocide”的含义是什么?本题测试根据上下文推测词义的能力。后面写到:荷兰卡尔卡那样的核工厂每年生产约200磅钚,只要一磅钚释放到大气层就可能使90亿人患肺癌。可见,戈夫曼博士在反核技术的观点中谈到的是“巨大的生物毁灭”。此外,从构词上看,eco-意为“生态”,-cide作为后缀,意为“杀灭”。所以,ecocide意为“生态生物灭绝”。故应选[D]。
单选题 According to the text, the author mentions plutonium in paragraph 1 to
[A] estimate the amount of nuclear material in Europe.
[B] exemplify one of the possible causes of lung cancer.
[C] highlight the measures needed to prevent lung cancer.
[D] show the destructive properties of industrial waste materials.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[注释] 逻辑结构题。本题问:根据课文,作者在第一段中提到钚是为了什么?解这类题的思路是从宏观看微观、从主题看细节。本文的主题是讲“先进技术与癌症的因果关系”。第1段中作者讲到“只要一磅钚释放到大气层就可能使90亿人患肺癌”。可见,作者提到钚是要举出造成癌症原因的一个例子。故应选[B]。[A]“估计欧洲核材料的数量”,与全文主题和段落逻辑结构相悖。[C]“强调预防癌症所需要的措施”,段落中没有谈到措施。[D]“表明工业废料的毁灭性能”,钚是核物质,并非一般工业废料。故[A],[C],[D]均不能入选。
单选题 The style of the second paragraph is mainly
[A] factual.
[B] sarcastic.
[C] emotional.
[D] argumentative.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】[注释] 语气判断题。本题问:第2段的文体是什么?通读第2段,可以看出,作者举出许多实例来说明石棉是致癌物质之一。作者只是陈述事实,没有与人争论,也没有感情激动和讥讽。故排除argumentative(议论的),emotional(感情激动的),sarcastic(讥讽的)。
单选题 According to paragraph 3, some workers have been killed by harmful pollutants in that
[A] production could not be halted.
[B] they failed to take safety measures.
[C] research was not pursued to a solution.
[D] safety equipment was not adequately provided.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】[注释] 细节理解题。本题问:根据第3段,为什么有些工人死于有害污染物?第3段倒数第2句写道:“至少17名工人死于氯乙烯,原因是25年来研究工作没有一追到底。”10余年来,工人接触到的氯乙烯浓度是道尔化学公司硬性规定的“安全极限”的10倍。故[C]“研究没有进行到问题解决”与原文相符。
单选题 It can be inferred from the text that the author believes that
[A] nationwide application of anti-pollution devices can finally prevent cancer.
[B] tough legislation is needed to set lower limits of worker exposure to harmful chemicals.
[C] more research is required into the causes of cancer before further progress can be made.
[D] industrialization must be slowed down to prevent further spread of cancer-causing agents.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】[注释] 推理判断题。从本文可以推理,作者同意下面哪一看法?[A]“全国采用反污染装置才能最后防止癌症”过于偏激,实际上做不到。[C]“更多研究癌症的原因才能取得进一步的进展”,只是研究致癌原因而不采取措施,于事无补。[D]“必须使工业化减速以防止致癌物的扩散”属极端做法。[B]“建立更严厉的法律来限制工人接触有害化学物质”可从文中推断出,因为第3段后半段写道:“由于医学科学家和管理当局重视不够,许多工人在高浓度氯乙烯的环境中工作,健康和生命受到威胁。”而现行的各种限制标准比道尔公司规定的“安全极限”都高。所以,可以推理,作者认为,需要更严格的法规来降低工人接触有害化学物质的量。故应选[B]。
注意:the official maximum permissible body burden公认的体内最大承受量。biodegradable不能起生物递降分解作用的。