Passage Four
For a quarter of a century, surveys of reading habits by the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), a federally-funded body, have been favorite material for anyone who thinks America is dumbing down. Susan Jacoby, author of“The Age of American Unreason”,for example, cites the 2007 NEA report that “the proportion of 17-year-olds who read nothing (unless required to do so for school) more than doubled between 1984 and 2004.”
So it is a surprise that this bellwether seems to have taken a turn for the better. This week the NEA reported that, for the first time since 1982 when its survey began, the number of adults who said they had read a novel, short story, poem or play in the past 12 months had gone up, rising from 47% of the population in 2002 to over 50% in 2008.
The increase, modest as it is, has thrown educationalists into a tizzy. “It's just a blip,” one professor told The New York Times. It is certainly a snapshot. But it is not statistically insignificant. As the NEAs research director, Sunil Iyengar, points out, almost every demographic and ethnic group seems to be reading more.
The increase has been most marked in groups whose reading had declined most in the past 25 years, African-Americans and Hispanics (up by 15% and 20% respectively since 2002). It has also been larger among people at lower levels of education: reading among college graduates was flat, but among those who dropped out of high school it rose from under a quarter to over a third.
Most remarkable of all has been the rebound among young men. The numbers of men aged 18-24 who say they are reading books (not just online) rose 24% in 2002-08. Teachers sometimes despair of young men, whose educational performance has lagged behind that of young women almost across the board. But the reading gap at least may be narrowing. Dana Gioia, the NEAs outgoing chairman, thinks the reason for the turnaround is the public reaction to earlier reports which had sounded the alarm. “There has been a measurable change in society's commitment to literacy,” he says. “Reading has become a higher priority.”
It may also be benefiting from the growing popularity of serious-minded leisure pursuits of many kinds. Museums, literary festivals and live opera transmissions into cinemas are all reporting larger audiences. Mr. Iyengar thinks the division between those who read a lot and those who don't is eroding. What has not changed, though, is America's “functional illiteracy” rate. Fully 21% of adult Americans did not read a book last year because they couldn't one of the worst rates in the rich world.
What does the author mean by “dumbing down” in Paragraph 1?
根据第一段后半部分可知,美国1 7岁的青少年没有读书的比例在1984年到2004年间增长了两倍多,从这可以推断出该词的意思最有可能是“文盲的,不识字的”。
According to Paragraph 2, the trend seems to have taken a turn for the better in that________.
从第二段 “the number of adults who said they had read a novel …over 50% in 2008” 可以得知,美国的成年人读者比例在2002年到2008年间上升了 8%左右。所以答案为D 项。
Sunil Iyengar, the NEAs research director points out that________.
通过第三段最后一句的描述, Simil lyengar认为几乎美国的每一个种族群体相比以前都更爱读书了,B 项符合原文,故选B 项。
The underlined sentence in Paragraph 5 denotes that young men have________.
由整个第五段可知,年轻男性正在逐渐缩小和年轻女性在读书上的差距,因此正确答案为A 项。B、C、 D 三项文章均未提到。
Which of the following statements is true according to the last two paragraphs?
最后一段最后两句说到,在美国,半文盲比例高的情况始终没有改变,所以D 项正确。