阅读理解

Passage B

Of all the lessons taught by the financial crisis, the most personal one has been that American aren‟t too slick with money. We take out home loans we can‟t afford. We run up sky-high credit-card debt. We don‟t save nearly enough for the retirement.
​​​​​​In response, proponents of financial-literacy education are stumping with renewed zeal. School districts in states such as New Jersey and Illinois are adding money-management courses to their curriculums. The Treasury and Education departments are sending lesson plans to high schools and encouraging students to compete in the National Financial Capability Challenge that begins in March.
Students with top scores on that exam will receive certificates—but chances for long-term benefits are slim. As it turns out, there is little evidence that traditional efforts to boost financial know-how help students make better decisions outside the classroom.Even as the financial- literacy movement has gained steam over the past decade, scores have falling on tests that measure how informed students are about things such as budgeting, credit cards, insurance and investments. A survey of college students conducted for the JumpStart Coalition for Personal Financial Literacy found that students who‟d had a personal-finance or money-management course in high school scored no better than those who hadn‟t.
“We need to figure out how to do this in the right way,” says Lewis Mandell, a professor at the University of Washington who after 15 years of studying financial-literacy programs has come to the conclusion that current methods don‟t work.A growing number of researchers and educators agree that a more radical approach is needed. They advocate starting financial education a lot earlier than high school, putting real money and spending decisions into kids‟ hands and talking openly about the emotions and social influences tied to how we spend.
One promising example of new thinking is found on Chicago‟s South Side. At the Ariel Community Academy, financial education starts in kindergarten with books like A Chair for My Mother (the moral: if you want to buy something, save money first) and quickly becomes hands-on. Each entering class at Ariel is entrusted with a $20,000 investment portfolio, and by seventh grade, kids are deciding what to buy and sell (profits help pay for college). Last year, for the first time, the eighth-grade class graduated with less than the original $20,000. Talk about a teachable moment: stocks don‟t always go up.
Other initiatives are tackling such real-world issues as the commercial and social pressures that affect purchasing decisions. Why exactly do you want those expensive name-brand sneakers so badly? “It takes confidence to take a stand and to think differently,” says Jeroo Millimoria, founder of Aflatoun, a nonprofit whose curriculum, used in more than 30 countries, aims to help kids get a leg up in their financial lives. “This goes beyond money and savings.”
That approach might have helped in the recent housing bubble. Buyers didn‟t just need to know how different sorts of mortgages worked; they also needed the fortitude to choose a 30-year fixed rate when everyone around them was buying a bigger house with a riskier loan.
Amid such a complicated landscape, some experts question whether there could ever be enough education to adequately prepare Americans for financial life. A better solution, these critics contend, is to reform the system. “What works is creating institutions that make it easy to do the right thing,” says David Laibson, a Harvard economics professor who, like Mandell, has decided after years of research that education isn‟t a silver bullet. One idea being discussed in Washington is the automatic IRA. Employers would have to enroll each worker in a personal retirement-savings account unless that worker decided to opt out.
​​​​​​Yet even the skeptics are slow to write off financial education completely. More than anything, they say, we need to rigorously study the financial decisions of alumni of programs like Ariel and Aflatoun and compare them with those of peers who didn‟t get the same sort of education. “Until you have experimental evidence, it‟s all a little speculative,” says Michael Sherraden, a professor at Washington University in St. Louis who is conducting a seven-year, randomized, controlled study on whether giving children bank accounts inculcates the habit of saving—a program already being tried on a large scale in the U. K. Yes, good, solid research like this takes a lot of time and resources. But if what we‟re doing right now isn‟t working, it‟s in our own best interest to figure out what does.

单选题

What are Americans supposed to do personally after the financial crisis?

【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】

根据文章第一段“Of all the lessons taught by the financial crisis, the most personal one has been that American aren‟t too slick with money.”即美国人从金融危机中所学到的教训是, 人们都非常不善于理财。 因此人们应该做好准备提高自己的理财能力, 故B为正确答案。

单选题

What is Lewis Mandell‟s feeling toward the current financial-literacy movement?

【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】

由题干Lewis Mandell定位至文章第四段, 文中说到“Lewis...has come to the conclusion that current methods don‟t work.”即当前的方法是无用的。 对应选项B的ineffective, 故B为正确答案。

单选题

According to the passage, the new kindergarten-entrance financial education is designed to ________.

【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】

题干“the new kindergarten-entrance financial education”在文中第5段提及, 联系上下文这种教育响应了研究学者所提倡的“starting financial education a lot earlier than high school, putting real money and spending decisions into kids‟ hands”即从做开始就培养孩子理财的意识, 故A为正确答案。

单选题

According to some critics, a better way to ensure Americans to prepare for financial life is ________.

【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】

文章倒数第二段提到“A better solution, these critics contend, is to reform the system.”以及下文的“What works is creating institutions...”说明更好的方式是改革当前系统, 建立新的机构, 对应选项D中的set up new institutions, 故D为正确答案。

单选题

Which of the following adjectives best describes the author‟s treatment of the topic?

【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】

作者全文都只是在描述现象或引用学者观点, 并无添加个人感情色彩,可以推断其持客观态度保持中立。 故A为正确答案, neutral中立的。