阅读理解 As college seniors hurtle into the job hunt, little lies on the resume—for example, claiming a degree when they're three credits shy of graduation—seem harmless enough. So new grads ought to read this memo now: those 20-year-old falsehoods on cream-colored, 32-lb. premium paper have ruined so many high-profile executives that you wonder who in the business world hasn't got the message. A resume listing two fabricated degrees led to the resignation of David Edmondson, CEO of RadioShack, in February. Untruthful resume have also hindered the careers of executives at the U.S. Olympic Committee.
The headlines haven't dented job seekers' desire to dissemble even as employers have grown increasingly able to detect deception. InfoLink Screening Services, a background-checking company, estimates that 14% of job applicants in the U.S. lie about their education on their resumes.
Employees who lie to get in the door can cause untold damage on a business, experts say, from staining the reputation and credibility of a firm to upending co-workers and projects to igniting shareholder wrath—and that's if the lie is found out. Even when it isn't, the falsified resume can indicate a deeply rooted inclination toward unethical behavior.
"There's a lot of evidence that those who cheat on job applications also cheat in school and in life," says Richard Griffith, director of the industrial and organizational psychology program at the Florida Institute of Technology. "If someone says they have a degree and they don't, I'd have little faith that person would tell the truth when it came to financial statements and so on."
Employers' fears have sparked a boom in the background-screening industry. But guarding the henhouse does little good if the fox is already nestled inside. To unmask the deceivers among them, some employers are conducting checks upon promotion. Verified Person markets its ability to provide ongoing employee screening through automated criminal checks. With this increased alertness comes a thorny new dilemma; figuring out whether every he is really a fireable offense. Many bosses feel that a worker's track record on the job speaks more strongly than a stretched resume, says John Challenger of the outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. Rather than booting talented workers, Challenger suggests, employers should offer a pardon period "A moratorium would let anyone who needs to come clean," he says. And the culprit could always go back to school and finish that degree—maybe even on company time.
单选题 11.By citing the examples of David Edmondson, the author intends to show that______.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】事实细节题。举例一般是为了说明某一观点/看法,因而要在例子前面找答案。第二句说到许多高管因为简历造假而纷纷下马,可见第三句的例子是为了举例说明第二句的情况。B项为正确答案。
单选题 12.By saying "The headlines haven't dented job seekers' desire to dissemble" (Para. 2), the author means that ______.
【正确答案】 A
【答案解析】句意理解题。题干所引述的句子为第二段第一句,原文中其后的内容对其进行例证。根据第二句提供的数据“在美国,约14%的求职者在简历中谎报受教育经历”,可推断出造假行为并没有因为新闻而消失,故A项正确。
单选题 13.If a lie is found out, one consequence will probably be _____.
【正确答案】 D
【答案解析】推理判断题。根据第三段第一句,作者列举了三种后果“损害公司声誉、影响同事的正常工作和项目的正常进行以及引起股东的愤怒”,可得出D项为正确答案。
单选题 14.Falsehood on resume shows that the job seeker may _____.
【正确答案】 B
【答案解析】观点态度题。根据第三段第二句以及第四段Richard Griffith所说的“如果一个人撒谎说他具有某种学历,我会很难相信他在财务报表等问题上能诚信办事”,可得出B项为正确答案。
单选题 15.According to Challenger, when the bosses screen out deceivers in their companies, they tend to_____.
【正确答案】 C
【答案解析】推理判断题。第七句的Rather than表明老板们并没有开除优秀员工,其后提到的a pardon period就是C项的a period of time to make remedy,可推断出C项为正确答案。